Show simple item record

Word-final /ɔ̃/ in Greater Poland Polish: A Cumulative Context Effect?

dc.contributor.authorKaźmierski, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorSzlandrowicz, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T15:34:21Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T15:34:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/38355
dc.description.abstractAn empirical corpus-based study of the likelihood of realizing the Polish nasal vowel /ɔ̃/ word-finally as [ɔm] (i.e. of 'nasal stopping') is presented. The goal was to verify whether the phenomenon exhibits a cumulative context effect, with words typically occurring in an environment favoring a particular phonetic variant showing higher rates of that variant regardless of environment. The results show that nasal stopping is more likely before stop-initial words than before words beginning in other sounds, if there is no intervening pause. Results with regard to the hypothesis that words typically followed by stops will show higher likelihood of nasal stopping, however, remain inconclusive.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;4en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectPolishen
dc.subjectnasal vowelsen
dc.subjectcumulative context effecten
dc.subjectcorpus phonologyen
dc.titleWord-final /ɔ̃/ in Greater Poland Polish: A Cumulative Context Effect?en
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number381-394
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKaźmierski, Kamil - Adam Mickiewicz Universityen
dc.referencesBaayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.en
dc.referencesBaranowska, K. (2018). Nasal vowels in English and Polish. A comparative analysis and a sociolinguistic study (Master’s thesis). Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.en
dc.referencesBaranowska, K., & Kaźmierski, K. (2020). Polish word-final nasal vowels: Variation and, potentially, change. Sociolinguistic Studies.en
dc.referencesBates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01en
dc.referencesBaumann, A., & Ritt, N. (2017). On the replicator dynamics of lexical stress: Accounting for stress-pattern diversity in terms of evolutionary game theory. Phonology, 34(03), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675717000240en
dc.referencesBiedrzycki, L. (1978). Fonologia angielskich i polskich rezonantów. Porównanie samogłosek oraz spółgłosek rezonantowych. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en
dc.referencesBoersma, D., Paul & Weenink. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.41, retrieved 15 Aug 2018 from http://www.praat.org/en
dc.referencesBybee, J. (2017). Grammatical and lexical factors in sound change: A usage-based approach. Language Variation and Change, 29(03), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394517000199en
dc.referencesChomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.en
dc.referencesDubisz, S., Karaś, H., & Kolis, N. (1995). Dialekty i gwary polskie. Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna.en
dc.referencesDukiewicz, L. (1967). Polskie głoski nosowe. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en
dc.referencesDukiewicz, L., & Sawicka, I. (1995). Fonetyka i fonologia. Cracow: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN.en
dc.referencesDunaj, B. (2006). Zasady poprawnej wymowy polskiej. Język Polski, 3, 161–172.en
dc.referencesEddington, D., & Channer, C. (2010). American English has goʔ a loʔ of glottal stops: Social diffusion and linguistic motivation. American Speech, 85(3), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-019en
dc.referencesForrest, J. (2017). The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING). Language Variation and Change, 29(02), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394517000072en
dc.referencesFromont, R., & Hay, J. (2012). LaBB-CAT: An Annotation store. In Proceedings of the australasian language technology association workshop (pp. 113–117). Dunedin, New Zealand.en
dc.referencesGahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035en
dc.referencesGruchmanowa, M. (2006). Językoznawcze wędrówki nie tylko po Poznaniu. Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk.en
dc.referencesGussmann, E. (2007). The phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesJarosz, G., Calamaro, S., & Zentz, J. (2016). Input frequency and the acquisition of syllable structure in polish. Language Acquisition, 24(4), 361–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1179743en
dc.referencesJarosz, G., & Johnson, J. A. (2013). The richness of distributional cues to word boundaries in speech to young children. Language Learning and Development, 9(2), 175–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.641904en
dc.referencesKaźmierski, K., Kul, M., & Zydorowicz, P. (2019). Educated Poznań speech 30 years later. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 136(4), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.19.021.11314en
dc.referencesKul, M., Zydorowicz, P., & Kaźmierski, K. (2020). The Greater Poland Spoken Corpus: Data collection, structure and application. In M. Wrembel, A. Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, & P. Gąsiorowski (Eds.), Approaches to the study of sound structure and speech. Interdisciplinary work in honour of katarzyna dziubalska-kołaczyk (pp. 198–212). New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesLevelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99001776en
dc.referencesMadejowa, M. (1987). Współczesna polska norma językowa w zakresie wymowy samogłosek nosowych. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia, 1, 31–56.en
dc.referencesMadelska, L. (2005). Słownik wariantywności fonetycznej współczesnej polszczyzny. Cracow: Collegium Columbinum.en
dc.referencesMandera, P., Keuleers, E., Wodniecka, Z., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 471–483.en
dc.referencesOstaszewska, D., & Tambor, J. (1990). Fonetyka i fonologia współczesnego języka polskiego. Warsaw: PWN.en
dc.referencesPrince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. ROA-537.en
dc.referencesRaymond, W. D., Brown, E. L., & Healy, A. F. (2016). Cumulative context effects and variant lexical representations: Word use and English final t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change, 28(02), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394516000041en
dc.referencesR Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/en
dc.referencesSeyfarth, S. (2014). Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition, 133(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013en
dc.referencesStrycharczuk, P., & Scobbie, J. M. (2016). Gradual or abrupt? The phonetic path to morphologisation. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.003en
dc.referencesTanner, J., Sonderegger, M., & Wagner, M. (2017). Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.96en
dc.referencesWiśniewski, M. (2000). Zarys fonetyki i fonologii współczesnego języka polskiego. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.en
dc.referencesWitaszek-Samborska, M. (1985). Regionalizmy fonetyczne w mowie inteligencji poznańskiej. Slavia Occidentalis, 17, 91–104.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailKaźmierski, Kamil - kkazmierski@wa.amu.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailSzlandrowicz, Marta - m.szlandrowicz@wp.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.18.4.02
dc.relation.volume18


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10236-Article_Text-26663-1-10- ...
Size:
409.3Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0