Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNowicka-Franczak, Magdalena
dc.description.abstractPost-Foucauldian discourse and dispositif analysis, a methodological approach inspired by the work of Michel Foucault and developed in Western Europe, over the last decade has gained an increasing amount of attention from Eastern European researchers. Yet, this interest has not been accompanied by sufficient reflection on the post-Foucauldian perspective’s adequacy for studying power, governance, and subjectification in post-socialist societies. In particular, there is little criticism that would take into account the current discussion on Foucault’s ambivalent attitude towards neoliberalism. The goal of this article is to examine this line of criticism of Foucault’s late works and to point to its importance for dispositif analysis carried out in Eastern and Central European societies (e.g., Poland) in comparison to analyses carried out in Western Europe (e.g., Germany). I propose a number of methodological recommendations that aim at adapting post-Foucauldian research instruments to facilitate analyzing power relations in the post-socialist context; these include: an interdisciplinary combination of discourse analysis and an analysis of macroeconomic and macrosocial factors; an analysis of the practices of normalization in post-socialist societies with reference to the Center-Periphery relationship; introducing elements of semiology, anthropology of the contemporary and cultural identity analysis to dispositif analysis.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;1en
dc.subjectDiscourse Analysisen
dc.subjectDispositif Analysisen
dc.subjectMichel Foucaulten
dc.subjectCentral and Eastern Europeen
dc.titlePost-Foucauldian Discourse and Dispositif Analysis in the Post-Socialist Field of Research: Methodological Remarksen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Polanden
dc.referencesAhmad, Aijaz. 1992. In Theory. London: Verso.en
dc.referencesAngermüller, Johannes. 2010. “Widerspenstiger Sinn. Skizze eines diskursanalytischen Forschungsprogramms nach dem Strukturalismus [Unruly Sense. Sketch of a Discourse-Analytical Research Program after Structuralism].” Pp. 71-100 in Diskursanalyse meets Gouvernementalitätsforschung. Perspektiven auf das Verhältnis von Subjekt, Sprache, Macht und Wissen [Discourse Analysis Meets Governmentality Research. Perspectives on the Relationship between Subject, Language, Power, and Knowledge], edited by J. Angermüller and S. van Dyk. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus.en
dc.referencesAngermüller, Johannes and Silke van Dyk, eds. 2010. Diskursanalyse meets Gouvermentalitätsforschung. Perspektiven auf das Verhältnis von Subjekt, Sprache, Macht und Wissen [Discourse Analysis Meets Governmentality Research. Perspectives on the Relationship between Subject, Language, Power, and Knowledge]. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus.en
dc.referencesAugustyniak, Piotr. 2015. Homo polacus: Eseje o polskiej duszy [Homo Polacus: Essays on the Polish Soul]. Cracow: Znak.en
dc.referencesAugustyniak, Piotr. 2019. Wyspiański: Burzenie polskiego kościoła. Studium o “Wyzwoleniu” [Wyspiański: Demolishing the Polish Church. A Study of “Liberation”]. Cracow: Znak.en
dc.referencesBall, Stephen J. 2017. Foucault as Educator. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesBarthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.en
dc.referencesBecker, Gary S., François Ewald, and Bernard E. Harcourt. 2012. “‘Becker on Ewald on Foucault on Becker’: American Neoliberalism and Michel Foucault’s 1979 ‘Birth of Biopolitics’ Lectures.” University of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 614; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 4 01. Retrieved January 03, 2021
dc.referencesBehrent, Michael C. 2009. “Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free Market Creed 1976-1979.” Modern Intellectual History 6(3):539-568.en
dc.referencesBehrent, Michael C. 2016. “Conclusion: The Strange Failure (and Peculiar Success) of Foucault’s Project.” Pp. 176-186 in Foucault and Neoliberalism, edited by. D. Zamora and M. C. Behrent. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesBielska, Beata and Michał Wróblewski. 2017. “Central-Eastern Europe as Postcolonially Involved (Sub)Peripheries.” Eastern European Countryside 23:209-220.en
dc.referencesBlanchet, Thomas, Lucas Chancel, and Amory Gethin. 2019. “How Unequal Is Europe? Evidence from Distributional National Accounts, 1980-2017.” WORKING PAPER No. 2019/06. Retrieved June 14, 2019
dc.referencesBogołębski, Tomasz. 2014. “Coaching w optyce rządomyślności. Próba krytycznej analizy zjawiska [Coaching in the Context of Governmentality. An Attempt at a Critical Analysis].” Pp.173-196 in Dyskurs elit symbolicznych. Próba diagnozy [Discourse of Symbolic Elites. An Attempt at a Diagnosis], edited by M. Czyżewski et al. Warsaw: Sedno.en
dc.referencesBosančić, Saša. 2018. “Die Forschungsperspektive der Interpretativen Subjektivierungsanalyse [The Research Perspective of the Interpretative Subjectification Analysis].” Pp. 43-64 in Subjekt und Subjektivierung, Empirische und theoretische Perspektiven auf Subjektivierungsprozesse [Subject and Subjectification, Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Subjectification Processes], edited by A. Geimer, S. Amlingand, and S. Bosančić. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesBosančić, Saša and Reiner Keller, eds. 2016. Perspektiven wissenssoziologischer Diskursforschung [Perspectives of the Sociology of Knowledge on Discourse Research]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesBosančić Saša, Lisa Pfahl, and Boris Traue. 2019. “Empirische Subjektivierungsanalyse: Entwicklung des Forschungsfeldes und methodische Maximen der Subjektivierungsforschung [Empirical Analysis of Subjectification: Development of the Research Field and Methodological Maxims of Subjectification Research].” Pp. 135-150 in Diskursive Konstruktionen, Theorie und Praxis der Diskursforschung [Discursive Constructions, Theory, and Practice of Discourse Research], edited by S. Bosančić and R. Keller. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesBrown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.en
dc.referencesBröckling, Ulrich. 2007. Das unternehmerische Selbst. Soziologie einer Subjektivierungsform [The Entrepreneurial Self. Sociology of a Form of Subjectivation]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.en
dc.referencesBröckling, Ulrich, Susanne Krasmann, and Thomas Lemke, eds. 2010. Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesBührmann, Andrea D. 2005. “Das Auftauchen des unternehmerischen Selbst und seine gegenwärtige Hegemonialität. Einige grundlegende Anmerkungen zur Analyse des (Trans-) Formierungsgeschehens moderner Subjektivierungsweisen [The Emerging of the Entrepreneurial Self and Its Current Hegemony. Some Basic Reflections on How to Analyze the Formation and Transformation of Modern Forms of Subjectivity].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(1): Art. 1. Retrieved August 07, 2019
dc.referencesBührmann, Andrea D. and Werner Schneider. 2008. Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv: Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse [From Discourse to Dispositive: An Introduction to Dispositive Analysis]. Bielefeld: Transcript.en
dc.referencesCaborn, Joannah. 2007. “On the Methodology of Dispositive Analyses.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1:112-123.en
dc.referencesChutorański, Maksymilian. 2013a. “Krajowe Ramy Wysokiego Performansu? [The National Framework for High Performance].” Studia Pedagogiczne 66:63-76.en
dc.referencesChutorański, Maksymilian. 2013b. “Urządzanie uniwersytetu [The Governmentality of the University].” Pp. 57-78 in Fabryki dyplomów czy universitas? [Diploma Mills or Universitas?], edited by M. Czerepaniak-Walczak. Cracow: Impuls.en
dc.referencesCzyżewski, Marek. 2012. “Wiedza specjalistyczna i praktyka społeczna – przemiany i pułapki [Specialist Knowledge and Social Practice—Traps and Transformations].” Pp. 71-93 in Kontrowersje dyskursywne. Między wiedzą specjalistyczną a praktyką społeczną [Discursive Controversies. Between Specialist Knowledge and Social Practice], edited by A. Jabłoński, J. Szymczyk, and M. Zemło. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.en
dc.referencesDean, Mitchell. 2018. “Foucault and the Neoliberalism Controversy.” Pp. 40-53 in The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism, edited by D. Cahill et al. London: SAGE Publications.en
dc.referencesDean, Mitchell and Daniel Zamora. 2018. “Did Foucault Reinvent His History of Sexuality through the Prism of Neoliberalism?” Los Angeles Review of Books, 18th April. Retrieved December 28, 2018
dc.referencesDiaz-Bone, Rainer and Ronald Hartz, eds. 2017. Dispositiv und Ökonomie. Diskurs- und dispositiv analytische Perspektiven auf Märkte und Organisationen [Dispositive and Economy. Discourse and Dispositive Analytical Perspectives on Markets and Organizations]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesDiaz-Bone, Rainer et al. 2007. “The Field of Foucauldian Discourse Analysis: Structures, Developments and Perspectives.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8(2): Art. 30. Retrieved August 07, 2019
dc.referencesElden, Stuart. 2016a. Foucault’s Last Decade: An Interview with Stuart Elden. Critical Theory. Retrieved December 27, 2018
dc.referencesElden, Stuart. 2016b. Foucault’s Last Decade. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesEribon, Didier. 1991. Michel Foucault. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesFisch, Michael. 2011. Werke und Freuden. Michel Foucault – eine Biographie [Works and Joys. Michel Foucault—A Biography]. Bielefeld: Transcript.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1976. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1980. “The Confession of the Flesh.” Pp. 194-228 in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-1977 by Michel Foucault, edited by C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1981. “The Order of Discourse.” Pp. 51-78 in Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, edited by R. Young. Boston, London, Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1991. “Politics and Ethics: An Interview.” Pp. 373-380 in The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow. New York: Pantheon.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2001a. “Question à Michel Foucault sur la géographie [Question to Michel Foucault on Geography].” Pp. 28-40 in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 [Words and Writings II. 1976-1988]. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2001b. “Michel Foucault: crimes et châtiments en U.R.S.S. et ailleurs… [Michel Foucault: Crimes and Punishments in USSR and Elsewhere…].” Pp. 63-74 in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 [Words and Writings II. 1976- 1988]. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2001c. “Pouvoir et savoir [Power and Knowledge].” Pp. 399-414 in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 [Words and Writings II. 1976-1988]. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2001d. “Michel Foucault: «Il n’y a pas de neutralité possible» [Michel Foucault: ‘No Neutrality Is Possible’].” Pp. 1157-1159 in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 [Words and Writings II. 1976-1988]. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2001e. “Foucault étudie la raison d’État [Foucault Studies Political Reason].” Pp. 801-805 in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 [Words and Writings II. 1976-1988]. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2001f. “Le premier pas de la colonisation de l’Occident [The First Step in the Colonization of the West].” Pp. 1080-1088 in M. Foucault, Dits et écrits II. 1976-1988 [Words and Writings II. 1976-1988]. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended. London: Allen Lane.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2006. History of Madness. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979. London: Palgrave.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel and Paul Rabinow. 1984. “Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations: An Interview with Michel Foucault.” Pp. 381-390 in The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow. New York: Pantheon.en
dc.referencesGdula, Maciej. 2018. Nowy autorytaryzm [New Authoritarianism]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.en
dc.referencesGomułka, Stanisław. 2016. “Poland’s Economic and Social Transformation 1989-2014 and Contemporary Challenges.” Central Bank Review 16(1):19-23.en
dc.referencesHamann, Julian et al. 2019. “The Academic Dispositif: Towards a Context-Centred Discourse Analysis.” Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists, Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, edited by R. Scholz. Retrieved January 03, 2021
dc.referencesHansen, Magnus Paulsen. 2015. “Foucault’s Flirt? Neoliberalism, the Left and the Welfare State: A Commentary on La dernière leçon de Michel Foucault and Critiquer Foucault.” Foucault Studies 20:291-306.en
dc.referencesHoffarth, Britta. 2013. “Schmutzige Witze. Erkundung eines Bildungsereignisses im Geschlechter-Dispositiv [Dirty Jokes. Exploration of an Educational Event in the Gender Dispositive].” Pp. 91-110 in Verortungen des Dispositiv-Begriffs. Analytische Einsätze zu Raum, Bildung, Politik [Locations of the Dispositive Concept. Analytical Assignments to Space, Education, Politics], edited by J. Caborn Wengler, B. Hoffarth, and Ł. Kumięga. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesHugo-Bader, Jacek. 2016. Skucha [Remorse]. Warsaw: Agora.en
dc.referencesJäger, Siegfried. 2001. “Discourse and Knowledge: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of a Critical Discourse and Dispositive Analysis.” Pp. 32-62 in Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer. London: Sage.en
dc.referencesJeanpierre, Laurent. 2006. “Une sociologie foucaldienne du néolibéralisme est-elle possible? [Is Foucauldian Sociology of Neoliberalism Possible?].” Sociologie et sociétés 38(2):87-111.en
dc.referencesKeller, Rainer. 2011. Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse: Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms [The Sociology of Knowledge Discourse Analysis: Laying the Foundations for a Research Program]. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.en
dc.referencesKeller, Rainer, Werner Schneider, and Willy Viehöver, eds. 2012. Diskurs–Macht–Subjekt: Theorie und Empirie von Subjektivierung in der Diskursforschung [Discourse—Power—Subject: Theory and Empiricism of Subjectification in Discourse Research]. Wiesbaden: VS.en
dc.referencesKovacs, János Mátyás. 1992. Reform and Transformation: Eastern European Economics on the Threshold of Change. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesKubala, Konrad. 2019. Racjonalność w dyskursach o pracy w Polsce (po)transformacyjnej [Rationality in Discourses about Work in (Post) Transformation Poland]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.en
dc.referencesLaczó, Ferenc and Joanna Wawrzyniak. 2017. “Memories of 1989 in Europe: Between Hope, Dismay, and Neglect.” East European Politics, Societies and Cultures 31(3):431-438.en
dc.referencesLagasnerie, Geoffroy de. 2012. La dernière leçon de Michel Foucault [The Last Lesson from Michel Foucault]. Paris: Fayard.en
dc.referencesLarner, Wendy. 2000. “Neoliberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality.” Studies in Political Economy 63:5-25.en
dc.referencesLaval, Christian. 2018. Foucault, Bourdieu et la question néolibérale [Foucault, Bourdieu and the Neoliberal Question]. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.en
dc.referencesLeder, Andrzej. 2014. Prześniona rewolucja: Ćwiczenia z logiki historycznej [Sleepwalking through a Revolution. Exercises in Historical Logic]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.en
dc.referencesLemke, Thomas. 2001. “The Birth of Bio-Politics—Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality.” Economy & Society 30(2):190-207.en
dc.referencesLewicki, Mikołaj. 2018. Przyszłość nie może się zacząć: Polski dyskurs transformacyjny w perspektywie teorii modernizacji i teorii czasu [The Future Cannot Begin: Polish Transformation Discourse in the Context of the Modernization Theory and Time Theory]. Warsaw: Scholar.en
dc.referencesLink, Jürgen. 2006. “Dispositiv und Interdiskurs. Mit Überlegungen zum Dreieck Foucault – Bourdieu – Luhmann [Dispositive and Interdiscourse. With Reflections on the Foucault— Bourdieu—Luhmann Triangle].” Pp. 219-238 in Foucault in den Kulturwissenschaften. Eine Bestandsaufnahme [Foucault in Cultural Studies. An Inventory], edited by C. Kammler and R. Parr. Heidelberg: Synchron.en
dc.referencesŁuczeczko, Paweł. 2006. Zrozumieć własną kulturę: Antropologia współczesności w Polsce [Understanding One’s Culture: Anthropology of Modern Times in Poland]. Cracow: Nomos.en
dc.referencesMacey, David. 1993. The Lives of Michel Foucault. New York: Vintage.en
dc.referencesMiller, James. 1993. The Passion of Michel Foucault. New York: HarperCollins.en
dc.referencesMikołajewska-Zając, Karolina and Joanna Wawrzyniak. 2016. “Nostalgia jako narzędzie krytyki transformacji: Mit dobrego właściciela w opowieściach pracowników fabrycznych [Nostalgia as a Tool for Criticizing the Transformation: The Myth of a Good Owner in the Stories of Factory Workers].” Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 12(2):36-54.en
dc.referencesMoore, David Choni. 2001. “Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique.” PLMA 116(1):111-128.en
dc.referencesNapiórkowski, Marcin. 2018. Mitologia współczesności [Contemporary Mythology]. Warsaw: PWN.en
dc.referencesNichols, Robert. 2010. “Postcolonial Studies and the Discourse of Foucault: Survey of a Field of Problematization.” Foucault Studies 9:111-144.en
dc.referencesNowicka-Franczak, Magdalena. 2017. Niechciana debata. Spór o książki Jana Tomasza Grossa [An Unwanted Debate. The Dispute over Jan Tomasz Gross’s Books]. Warsaw: Sedno.en
dc.referencesOstrowicka, Helena. 2012. Urządzanie młodzieży: Studium analityczno-krytyczne [Governmentalizing the Youth: A Critical Analytical Study]. Cracow: Impuls.en
dc.referencesOstrowicka, Helena. 2015. Przemyśleć z Michelem Foucaultem edukacyjne dyskursy o młodzieży: Dyspozytyw i urządzanie [Rethinking Educational Discourses about the Youth with Michel Foucault: The Dispositif and Governmentality]. Cracow: Impuls.en
dc.referencesOstrowicka, Helena and Justyna Spychalska-Stasiak. 2017. “‘Uodpowiedzialnianie’ akademii – formacje wiedzy i władza parametryzacji w dyskursie akademickim [‘Responsibilitizing’ Academia—Knowledge Formations and the Power of Parametrization in Academic Discourse].” Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe 49(1):105-131.en
dc.referencesPaulus, Stefan. 2015. “Methodologische Überlegungen und methodisches Vorgehen bei einer intersektionalen Dispositivanalyse [Methodological Considerations and Methodological Approach in an Intersectional Dispositive Analysis].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 16(1): Art. 21. Retrieved August 07, 2019
dc.referencesPfahl, Lisa, Lena Schürmann, and Boris Traue. 2015. “Das Fleisch der Diskurse. Zur Verbindung von Biographie- und Diskursforschung in der wissenssoziologischen Subjektivierungsanalyse am Beispiel der Behindertenpädagogik [The Flesh of the Discourse. On the Connection of Biography and Discourse Research in the Sociology of Knowledge Analysis of Subjectivation Using the Example of the Education of People with Disabilities].” Pp. 89-106 in Erziehungswissenschaftliche Diskursforschung. Empirische Analysen zu Bildungs- und Erziehungsverhältnissen [Educational Discourse Research. Empirical Analyzes of Educational and Upbringing Relationships], edited by S. Fegter et al. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesPorter-Szücs, Brian. 2014. Poland in the Modern World: Beyond Martyrdom. Chichester: Wiley.en
dc.referencesRabinow, Paul and Anthony Stavrianakis. 2013. Demands of the Day: On the Logic of Anthropological Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesRaffnsøe, Sverre, Marius Gudmand-Høyer, and Morten S. Thaning. 2016. “Foucault’s Dispositive: The Perspicacity of Dispositive Analytics in Organizational Research.” Organization 23(2):272-298.en
dc.referencesRehmann, Jan. 2016. “The Unfulfilled Promises of the Late Foucault and Foucauldian Governmentality Studies.” Pp. 134-158 in Foucault and Neoliberalism, edited by D. Zamora and M. C. Behrent. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesRicken, Norbert. 2006. Die Ordnung der Bildung: Beiträge zu einer Genealogie der Bildung [Order of Education: Contributions to a Genealogy of Education]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.en
dc.referencesRicken, Norbert. 2015. “Bildung als Dispositiv: Bemerkungen zur (Macht-)Logik eines Subjektivierungsmusters [Education as a Dispositive: Comments on the (Power-) Logic of a Subjectification Pattern].” Pp. 41-58 in Medien – Bildung – Dispositive: Beiträge zu einer interdisziplinären Medienbildungsforschung [Media—Education—Dis-positive: Contributions to Interdisciplinary Media Education Research], edited by J. Othmer and A. Weich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesRicken, Norbert. 2019. “Bildung und Subjektivierung: Bemerkungen zum Verhältniszweier Theorieperspektiven [Education and Subjectification: Remarks on the Relationship between Two Theoretical Perspectives].” Pp. 95-118 in Subjektivierung: Erziehungswissenschaftliche Perspektiven [Subjectification: Educational Perspectives], edited by N. Ricken, R. Casale, and Ch. Thompson. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa Verlag.en
dc.referencesRyziński, Remigiusz. 2017. Foucault w Warszawie [Foucault in Warsaw]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Dowody na Istnienie.en
dc.referencesSaid, Edward W. 1983. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesSarasin, Philipp. 2005. Michel Foucault zur Einführung [Michel Foucault as an Introduction]. Hamburg: Junius Verlag.en
dc.referencesSchneider, Werner. 2015. “Dispositive überall und nirgendwo? Anmerkungen zur Theorie und methodischen Praxis der Dispositivforschung [Dispositive Everywhere and Nowhere? Comments on the Theory and Methodological Practice of Dispositive Research].” Pp. 21-40 in Medien–Bildung–Dispositive: Beiträge zu einer interdisziplinären Medienbildungsforschung [Media—Education—Dispositive: Contributions to Interdisciplinary Media Education Research], edited by J. Othmer and A. Weich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.en
dc.referencesSowa, Jan. 2015. Inna Rzeczpospolita jest możliwa! Widma przeszłości, wizje przyszłości [A Different Republic Is Possible! Spectres of the Past and Visions of the Future]. Warsaw: W.A.B.en
dc.referencesSpecter, Matthew. 2015. “Introduction.” History and Theory: Forum: Foucault and Neoliberalism 54:367-371.en
dc.referencesSpivak, Gayatri. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Pp. 271-313 in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.en
dc.referencesSulima, Roch. 2000. Antropologia codzienności [An Anthropology of Commonplace]. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.en
dc.referencesSzczegóła, Lech and Mariusz Kwiatkowski. 2017. “Alternacja systemowa. Dobra zmiana w perspektywie socjologii sfery publicznej [“Systemic Alternation. The Good Change Viewed from the Per-spective of the Sociology the Public Sphere].” Studia Socjologiczne 227(4):49-71.en
dc.referencesSztompka, Piotr. 2001. The Ambivalence of Social Change: Triumph or Trauma? Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung GmbH.en
dc.referencesTuider, Elisabeth. 2007. “Diskursanalyse und Biographieforschung. Zum Wie und Warum von Subjektpositionierungen [Discourse Analysis and Biographical Research. On the How and Why of Subject Positioning].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8(2): Art. 6. Retrieved: September 07, 2019
dc.referencesVeyne, Paul. 2010. Foucault: His Thought, His Character. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesWarczok, Tomasz and Tomasz Zarycki. 2014. “Bourdieu Recontextualized: Redefinitions of Western Critical Thought in the Periphery.”Current Sociology 62(3):334-351.en
dc.referencesWarczok, Tomasz and Tomasz Zarycki. 2016. Gra peryferyjna: Polska politologia w globalnym polu nauk społecznych [A Peripheral Game: Polish Political Science and Its Place in Global Social Sciences]. Warsaw: Scholar.en
dc.referencesWasilewski, Jacek. 2012. Opowieści o Polsce: Retoryka narracji [Stories about Poland. The Rhetoric of Narration]. Warsaw: Headmade.en
dc.referencesZamora, Daniel. 2014. “Can We Criticize Foucault?” Jacobin Magazine 12. Retrieved August 12, 2019
dc.referencesZamora, Daniel and Michael C. Behrent, eds. 2016. Foucault and Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesZarycki, Tomasz. 2014. Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe. London, New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesZawieyski, Jerzy. 2011. Dzienniki. Tom I: Wybór z lat 1955–1959 [Journals. Volume 1: Selected Writings, 1955-1959]. Warsaw: Ośrodek Karta.en
dc.referencesZiółkowski, Marek. 2015. Teoria socjologiczna a transformacja społeczeństwa polskiego [Sociological Theory and the Transformation of the Polish Society]. Warsaw: Scholar.en
dc.referencesZysiak, Agata. 2019. “Hysteresis, Academic Biography, and Political Field in the People’s Republic of Poland.” Theory and Society 48(3):483-508.en

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as