dc.contributor.author | Trillò, Tommaso | |
dc.contributor.editor | Desperak, Iza | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-25T10:21:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-25T10:21:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2300-1690 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/39879 | |
dc.description.abstract | In mid-March, 2017, Italian public television channel RAI Uno
aired the last episode of a popular show called Parliamone… Sabato. The episode discussed the
romantic preferences of Italian men, and – particularly – why Italian men allegedly fantasize
about Eastern European women as their ideal partners. Following the episode, a portion of the
public rose in outrage for thesexist and racist content of the show. The protest obtained the
cancellation of the show and a public apology by the RAI network soon thereafter. One of the
key sites for the protest was the official Twitter hashtag of the show (#ParliamoneSabato). This
paper offers a discourse-centered online ethnography of a corpus of tweets gathered from
#ParliamoneSabato during the two weeks following the announcement that the show would be
put off the air. Text circulated via Twitter was analyzed in light of its broader context thanks to online observation and limited ethnographic engagement in the analog realm. The protest tweeted
at #ParliamoneSabato was analyzed through the lenses of Bennett and Sageberg’s ‘logic of connective action’ and Kelsey and Bennett’s ‘synoptic resistance’, as well as through the work of others
involved in the study of the relationship between social media and social movements. This paper
concludes that, despite its spontaneous character and its focus on singling out the misconducts
of ‘the few’ running the Parliamone… Sabato, the overall features of the public involved in the protest (especiallythe narrowness of the user based) make it hard to characterize it as a self-organized
protest of ‘the many’. In particular, it is crucial to notice that the protest might have originated
somewhat spontaneously and mostly online, but almost immediately traveled into the analog
world thanks to the brokerage of the Italian feminist movement “Non una di meno”. A closer look
at the language used in the context of the protest highlights that much of the conversation betrays some level of anxiety on behalf of the Italian public because of a (real or imagined) growth in
diversity within the country and its intertwining with gender issues and gender-related politics. | pl_PL |
dc.description.sponsorship | This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie
Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 675378. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Katedra Socjologii Polityki i Moralności, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologiczny | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Władza Sądzenia;14 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | social media | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Parliamone Sabato | pl_PL |
dc.subject | twitter politics | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Non una di meno | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Italy | pl_PL |
dc.title | Performing Feminist Resistance on Twitter: The case of #ParliamoneSabato in the Italian Twittersphere | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 74-91 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Lodz | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Tommaso Trillò is a Marie Skłodowska Curie Early Stage Researcher and PhD candidate
at the University of Lodz, Poland, in the context of GRACE - Gender and Cultures of Equality in Europe
(675378 – GRACE – H2020-MSCA-ITN- 2015/H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015). His main research focus
is on the production of cultures of gender equality on social media platforms. His main research project aims at exploring how key institutions at the EU supranational level and at the Italian national
level contribute to the construction of ‘gender equality’ as a core European value through a comparative analysis of the narratives they advance on Twitter. Trillò holds an MSc in Migration Studies
from the University of Oxford and a BA in Political Sciences from John Cabot University, Rome, Italy. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography, Language@ internet, 5(8). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Androutsopoulos, J. (2013). Online data collection, In: C. Mallinson, B. Childs & G. Van Herk (eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications (pp. 236–250). New York: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), pp. 1493–1512. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bauman, Z., Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bennett, W.L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 739–768 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fuchs, C. (2011). Foundations of critical media and information studies. New York: Routledge. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fuchs, C. (2013). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Gerbaudo P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Jensen, J.L. (2007). The internet omnopticon: Surveillance or counter-insurgency. In: H. Bang, A. Esmark (eds.), New Publics with/out Democracy (pp. 351–380). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kelsey, D. and Bennett, L. (2014). Discipline and resistance on social media: Discourse, power and context in the Paul Chambers “Twitter Joke Trial”’, Discourse, Context & Media, 3, pp. 37–45. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Predelli, L.N. and Halsaa, B. (eds.). (2012). Majorityminority relations in contemporary women’s movements: strategic sisterhood. London: Palgrave Macmillan. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Meraz, S. & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt, International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), pp. 138–166. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication, Discourse & Communication, 1(1), pp. 91–112. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. New York: Springer | pl_PL |
dc.references | Zacconi, J. (2017). Paola Perego assente: calano gli ascolti senza Parliamone Sabato, La nostra TV, 26 March [online]. Available at: http://www.lanostratv.it/2017/03/paola-perego-assente-calanogli-ascolti-senza-parliamone-sabato/ | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | nauki socjologiczne | pl_PL |