Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorЧевтаев, Аркадий
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-27T12:29:38Z
dc.date.available2021-12-27T12:29:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-23
dc.identifier.issn1427-9681
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/40349
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses the poetics of a little-known poem, “Neslyshnyi, melkyi padal dozhd’…” [‘It was quiet and drizzling…’] (1907), in terms of the formation of the motif of the double as a key parameter of Nikolai Gumilyov’s artistic world. This text was not published during the poet’s lifetime and is known from an autograph in a letter to Valery Bryusov. Gumilyov’s refraining from publishing this poem could have had various causes, but the author of the paper attributes it to two factors. The first one is that it would have been difficult to embed this text in the conceptual logic of the cross-cutting “plots” of either Romanticheskiye tsvety [‘Romantic Flowers’] (1908) or Zhemchuga [‘Pearls’] (1910), i. e. poetic books the creation of which is chronologically close to the time of writing this poem. The second is the fact that “Neslyshnyi, melkyi padal dozhd’…” explicitly affirms the demonic principle in the human “self ” as an axiological constant, explicating the adherence to the “diabolical” poetics of early Russian symbolism, which Gumilyov had been trying to creatively rethink since 1907. However, despite the author’s neglect, the poem merits close attention, since it shows fundamentally important aspects of Gumilyov’s artistic conception. This poetic text is based on a narrative representation of the meeting between the lyrical subject and the character of a killer, who appears as his double, an alter ego of “the self ”. The analysis of the poem shows that recognizing the value of the painful existence of the demonic stranger is an act of comprehending the ontological nature of evil, which in the consciousness of the lyrical “I” acquires the status of something equivalent to the good of the existential constant. In the structure of this text the motif of the double, which goes back to the poetic practice of the romanticism and of the Russian symbolism, is realised on the story-plot level by dividing the human soul into two hypostases, the “light” and the “dark” one, the meeting of which becomes for the lyrical subject an initiation into the essence of another world. The author formulates the conclusion that getting to know the infernal side of the universe, here through the actualisation of the motif of the double, was in Gumilyov’s writing conceived as a necessary process of gaining spiritual experience that would synthesise the “light” (positive) and the “dark” (negative) aspects of being. Accordingly, the lyrical “I”’s encounter with his criminal- -demonic double presented in the discussed poem reveals the principles of formation of Gumilyov’s occasional mythopoetics based on the convergence of ontological antinomies.en
dc.description.abstractВ статье рассматривается поэтика малоизвестного стихотворения Н. Гумилева «Неслышный, мелкий падал дождь…» (1907) в аспекте становления мотива двойничества как ключевого параметра гумилевского художественного мира. В основе данного поэтиче- ского текста находится нарративная репрезентация встречи лирического героя с персонажем- убийцей, предстающим в качестве двойнической ипостаси субъектного «я». Анализ стихот- ворения показывает, что ценностное узнавание страдальческого бытия демонического пришельца оказывается актом постижения онтологической природы зла, которое в созна- нии лирического героя обретает статус равновесной добру бытийной константы. Формули- руется вывод о том, что познание инфернальной стороны универсума посредством актуали- зации мотива двойничества в гумилевском творчестве мыслится необходимым процессом обретения духовного опыта, синтезирующего «светлые» (положительные) и «темные» (от- рицательные) аспекта бытия. Соответственно, представленное в данном тексте соприкос- новение лирического «я» с преступно-демоническим двойником демонстрирует принципы формирования окказиональной мифопоэтики Н. Гумилева, основанной на конвергенции онтологических антиномий.ru
dc.language.isoru
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Rossica;14en
dc.subjectNikolai Gumilyoven
dc.subjectthe doubleen
dc.subjectdichotomy of good and evilen
dc.subjectlyrical subjecten
dc.subjectlyrical narrativeen
dc.subjectsymbolismen
dc.subjectН. Гумилев, двойничествоru
dc.subjectдихотомия добра и злаru
dc.subjectлирический геройru
dc.subjectлирический нарративru
dc.subjectсимволизмru
dc.titleСтихотворение Николая Гумилева «Неслышный, мелкий падал дождь…»: мотив двойничества и постижение природы злаru
dc.title.alternativeThe Poem “Neslyshnyi, Melkyi Padal Dozhd’…” by Nikolai Gumilyov: The Motive of the Double and the Quest to Understand the Nature of Evilen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number81-95
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationРоссийский государственный гидрометеорологический университет Кафедра русского языка и литературы 192007 Санкт-Петербург Рижский проспект, 11ru
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4834
dc.referencesBasker, Maikl. Rannii Gumilev: Put k akmeizmu. Sankt-Peterburg: Russkii Khristianskii Gumanitarnyi Institut, 2000.ru
dc.referencesBriusov Valerii Ya. Sobranie sochinenii: v 7 t. Vol. 1. Stikhotvoreniya. Poemy. 1892–1909. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1973.ru
dc.referencesBroitman, Samson N. Russkaya lirika XIX – nachala XX veka v svete istoricheskoi poetiki: Subiektnoobraznaya struktura. Moskva: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, 1997.ru
dc.referencesGumilev, Nikolai S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. Vol. 1. Stikhotvoreniya. Poemy (1902–1910). Moskva: Voskresene, 1998.ru
dc.referencesKhanzen-Leve, Age. Russkii simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Mifopoeticheskii simvolizm. Kosmicheskaya simvolika. Sankt-Peterburg: Akademicheskii proekt, 2003.ru
dc.referencesKhanzen-Leve, Age. Russkii simvolizm. Sistema poeticheskikh motivov. Rannii simvolizm. Sankt-Peterburg: Akademicheskii proekt, 1999.ru
dc.referencesKholl, Menli P. Entsiklopedicheskoe izlozhenie masonskoi, germeticheskoi, kabbalisticheskoi i rozenkreytserovskoi simvolicheskoi filosofii, transl. V. V. Tselishchev. Moskva: AST, Astrel, 2005.ru
dc.referencesKuper, Dzhordzh. Entsiklopediya simvolov. Moskva: Zolotoi vek, 1995.ru
dc.referencesMagomedova, Dina M. Ballada. In: Teoriya literaturnykh zhanrov, ed. N. D. Tamarchenko. Moskva: Akademiya, 2011: 125–128.ru
dc.referencesMaksimov, Dmitrii E. Ob odnom stikhotvorenii (Dvoynik). In: Maksimov, Dmitrii E. Poeziya i proza Aleksandra Bloka. Leningrad: Sovetskii pisatel, 1981: 152–182.ru
dc.referencesMann, Yurii V. Russkaya literatura XIX veka. Epokha romantizma. Moskva: Rossiyskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, 2007.ru
dc.referencesMeletinskii, Eleazar M. O literaturnykh arkhetipakh. Moskva: Rossiyskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, 1994.ru
dc.referencesMinskii N., Dobroliubov A., Stikhotvoreniya i poemy. Sankt-Peterburg: Akademicheskii proekt, 2005.ru
dc.referencesSlobodniuk, Sergei L. Nikolai Gumilev: model mira (K voprosu o poetike obraza). In: Nikolai Gumilev. Issledovaniya i materialy. Bibliografiya, ed. M. D. Elzon and N. A. Groznova. Sankt-Peterburg, Moskva: Nauka, 1994: 143–164.ru
dc.referencesSmelova, Marina V. Ontologicheskie problemy v tvorchestve N. S. Gumileva. Tver: Tverskoi gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2004.ru
dc.referencesTishunina, Nataliya V. Zapadnoevropeyskii simvolizm i russkaya literatura poslednei treti XIX – nachala XX veka (Drama, poeziya, proza). Sankt-Peterburg: Leningradskii oblastnoi institute usovershenstvovaniya uchitelei, 1994.ru
dc.referencesTiupa, Valerii I. Diskurs / Zhanr. Moskva: Intrada, 2013.ru
dc.referencesValerii Briusov i ego korrespondenty. Vol. 2, ed. N. A. Trifonov. Moskva: Nauka, 1994.ru
dc.contributor.authorEmailachevtaev@yandex.ru
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1427-9681.14.08


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record