Biografia w liczbach: historiometryczne studium przypadku

Lebuda, Izabela

dc.contributor.author	Lebuda, Izabela
dc.contributor.editor	Modrzejewska-Świgulska, Monika
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-21T11:36:32Z
dc.date.available	2022-06-21T11:36:32Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.citation	Lebuda I., Biografia w liczbach: historiometryczne studium przypadku, [w:] Biograficzne badania nad twórczością. Teoria i empiria, „Twórczość i Edukacja”, t. 3, Modrzejewska-Świgulska M. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, s. 51-58, https://doi.org/10.18778/8088-224-9.04	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8088-224-9
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/42195
dc.description.abstract	In the historiometric case study described in the chapter, a nomothetic and idiographic approach was described, thus creating a unique possibilities of research into outstanding creativity. Previously, pedagogy and psychology noted few publications that would apply this not so common technique. Thus, an attempt was made to describe the main historiometric assumptions, a case study which would indicate its differences to other research solutions, what are the opportunities it presents, challenges and threats.	pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorship	Udostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00. Praca naukowa finansowana w ramach programu Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego pod nazwą „Iuventus Plus” w latach 2015–2016 nr projektu 0252/IP3/2015/73.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Modrzejewska-Świgulska M. (red.), Biograficzne badania nad twórczością. Teoria i empiria, „Twórczość i Edukacja”, t. 3, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016;
dc.relation.ispartofseries	„Twórczość i Edukacja”;3
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.subject	quantitative analysis	pl_PL
dc.subject	historiometry	pl_PL
dc.subject	case study	pl_PL
dc.subject	outstanding work	pl_PL
dc.title	Biografia w liczbach: historiometryczne studium przypadku	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	Biography in numbers: a historiometric case study	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.rights.holder	© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016	pl_PL
dc.page.number	51-58	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8088-225-6
dc.references	Cox C., 1926, Earlymentaltraitsifthreehundredgeniuses, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.	pl_PL
dc.references	Csikszentmihalyi M., 1997, Creativity. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, Harper Collins, New York.	pl_PL
dc.references	Denzin N.K., 1978, The Researchact: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method, McGraw-Hill, New York.	pl_PL
dc.references	Egghe L., 2005, Relations between the continuous and the discrete Lotka power function, „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, no. 56, s. 664–668.	pl_PL
dc.references	Glăveanu V., 2013, Rewriting the language of creativity: The five as framework, „Review of General Psychology”, no. 17, s. 69–81.	pl_PL
dc.references	Karwowski M., Lebuda I., 2013, Extending climato-economic theory: When, how, and why itexplains differences in nations’ creativity, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, no. 36, s. 29–31.	pl_PL
dc.references	Karwowski M., Lebuda I., 2014, Digit ratio predict seminence of Polish actors, „Personality and Individual Differences”, no. 64, s. 30–34.	pl_PL
dc.references	Karwowski M., Lebuda I., 2016, Written on the Writer’s Face: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio among Nominees and Laureates of the Nobel Prize in Literature, „Creativity Research Journal”, no. 2. doi: 0.1080/10400419.2016.1162572.	pl_PL
dc.references	Kaufman J.C & Beghetto R.A., 2009, Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity, „Review of General Psychology”, no. 13, s. 1–12.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lebuda I., 2014, Big-C Research – The Big Challenge? Reflections from research intoeminent creativity in the light of the investment theory of creativity, „Creativity: Theories-Research-Application”, no. 1, s. 33–45.	pl_PL
dc.references	Lebuda I., Oleś P., 2015, Analiza przypadku – studium psychobiograficzne umysłów niepospolitych, [w:] M. Filipiak, W. J. Paluchowski, B. Zalewski, M. Tarsińska (red.), Profesjonalnie o diagnozie: kompetencje i standardy, Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych, Warszawa, s. 271–292.	pl_PL
dc.references	Mróz B., 2008, Osobowość wybitnych aktorów polskich. Studium różnic międzygeneracyjnych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.	pl_PL
dc.references	Patton M.Q., 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Sage Publications, London–New Delhi.	pl_PL
dc.references	Runyan W.M., 1992, Historie życia a psychobiografia, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1984a, Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and with ingenerations, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, no. 6, s. 1273–1286.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1984b, Genius, creativity, and leadership: historiometric inquiries, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1986, Popularity, content, and context in 37 Shakespeare plays, „Poetics”, no. 15, s. 493–510.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1987, Musical aesthetics and creativity in Beethoven: A computer analysis of 105 compositions, „Empirical Studies of the Arts”, no. 5, s. 87–104.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1989, Shakespeare’s sonnets: a case of and for single-case historiometry, „Journal of Personality”, no. 3, s. 695–721.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1990, Lexical choices and aesthetic success: a computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets, „Computers and the Humanities”, no. 24, s. 251–264.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1998, Mad King George: the impact of personal and political stress on mental and physical health, „Journal of Personality”, no. 66, s. 443–466.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 1999, Origins of genius. Darwinian perspectives on creativity, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 2003, Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data, „Annual Review of Psychology”, no. 54, s. 617–640.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 2004/2008, Creativity in Science. Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgest, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 2009, Varieties of (scientific) creativity: a hierarchical model of domain-specificsis position, development, anachievement, „Perspectives on Psychological Science”, no. 4, s. 441–452.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 2010a, Creativity in highlyeminent individuals, [w:] J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 174–188.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 2010b, Geniusz, Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej, Warszawa.	pl_PL
dc.references	Simonton D.K., 2015, Thomas Edison’s creative career: the multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs, „Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, no. 1, s. 2–14.	pl_PL
dc.references	Urquhart C., 2013, Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research. A practical guide, SAGE Publication, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC.	pl_PL
dc.references	Vessey W.B., Barrett J.D., Mumford M.D, Johnson G., Litwiller B., 2014, Leadership of highly creative people in highly creative fields: A historiometric study of scientific leaders, „The Leadership Quarterly”, no. 25, s. 672–691.	pl_PL
dc.references	Weiser R.W., 1994, Genius and madness? A quasi-experimental test of the hypothesis that manic-depression increases creativity, „Psychological Science”, no. 5, s. 361–367.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8088-224-9.04
dc.discipline	literaturoznawstwo	pl_PL
dc.discipline	pedagogika	pl_PL
dc.discipline	psychologia	pl_PL