Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLipiński, Artur
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T07:03:13Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T07:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2300-1690
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42315
dc.description.abstractMimo że wielu autorów od dawna podkreśla znaczenie mediów jako ważnej zmiennej wyjaśniającej różne aspekty zjawiska populizmu, badania dotyczące relacji pomiędzy populizmem a mediami zintensyfikowano dopiero w ciągu ostatnich kilku lat, a ich liczba jest stosunkowo niewielka. Co zrozumiałe, jeszcze mniej jest badań, które odnosiłyby się do wykorzystania mediów społecznościowych przez aktorów populistycznych. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza wzajemnych związków pomiędzy populizmem a serwisami społecznościowymi traktowanymi jako struktury medialnych możliwości. Drugim z zadań jest krytyczna analiza obecnego w wielu tekstach założenia o prostej, funkcjonalnej relacji pomiędzy mediami społecznościowymi a populizmem. Służyć temu będzie rekonstrukcja pola badań nad wykorzystaniem nowych mediów przez aktorów populistycznych, prezentacja głównych nurtów oraz rezultatów tych badań. Podkreślić należy, że artykuł koncentruje się na aktorach politycznych, a nie posługujących się strategiami populistycznymi społecznych użytkownikach nowych mediów.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipArtykuł powstał w ramach projektu DEMOS „Democratic Efficacy and the Varieties of Populism in Europe” finansowanego przez program Unii Europejskiej w zakresie badań naukowych i innowacji, Horyzont 2020, Numer grantu: 822590.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherKatedra Socjologii Polityki i Moralności, Wydział Ekonomiczno-Socjologicznypl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWładza Sądzenia;19
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectpopulizmpl_PL
dc.subjectkomunikowanie politycznepl_PL
dc.subjectsfera publicznapl_PL
dc.subjectnowe mediapl_PL
dc.subjectFacebookpl_PL
dc.subjectTwitterpl_PL
dc.titlePopulizm a medialne struktury możliwości. Przypadek nowych mediówpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number74-95pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationZakład Teorii Polityki, Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Dziennikarstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniupl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteArtur Lipiński – politolog, profesor UAM w Zakładzie Teorii Polityki na Wydziale Nauk Politycznych i Dziennikarstwa Uniwersytetu im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. Obecnie jest kierownikiem polskiego zespołu w ramach konsorcjum Horyzont 2020 DEMOS „Democratic Efficacy and the Varieties of Populism in Europe” (https://demos-h2020.eu). Jego zainteresowania naukowe koncentrują się na zjawisku populizmu, polskiej polityce partyjnej, dyskursywnych mechanizmach konstruowania tożsamości, a także wybranych problemach konstruowania pamięci zbiorowej. Autor monografii dotyczącej prawicy na polskiej scenie politycznej oraz artykułów publikowanych na łamach polskich i międzynarodowych czasopism, m.in. „Problems of Post-Communism”, „Journalism Studies” „Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne”, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, „Studia Polityczne”.pl_PL
dc.referencesAbts, K., Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus Democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9248.2007.00657.xpl_PL
dc.referencesAlbertazzi, D., McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The Sceptre and the Spectre. W: D. Albertazzi, D. McDonnell (red.), Twenty-First century populism: The spectre of Western European Democracy (s. 1–11). London: Palgrave Macmillanpl_PL
dc.referencesAslanidis, P. (2016). Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88–104. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467–9248.12224pl_PL
dc.referencesBaldwin-Philippi, J. (2019). The technological performance of populism. New Media & Society, 21(2), 376–397. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444818797591pl_PL
dc.referencesBennett, S. (2019). Standing up for ‘real people’: UKIP, the Brexit, and discursive strategies on Twitter. W: J. Zienkowski, R. Breeze (red.), Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum (s. 230–256). Amsterdam: John Benjaminspl_PL
dc.referencesBennett, W. L., Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqx017pl_PL
dc.referencesBimber, B., Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980pl_PL
dc.referencesBlumler, J. G. (2018). The Crisis of Public Communication, 1995–2017. Javnost – The Public, 25(1–2), 83–92. DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2018.1418799pl_PL
dc.referencesBlumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M. (1995). The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesBonikowski, B., Gidron, N. (2016). Multiple Traditions in Populism Research: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter, 26(12), 7–14pl_PL
dc.referencesBoulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., Bimber, B. (2020). Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in Media & Society, 22(4), 683–699. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444819893983Western democracies. Newpl_PL
dc.referencesBracciale, R., Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: the case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522pl_PL
dc.referencesBreeze, R. (2020). Angry tweets: A corpus-assisted study of anger in populist political discourse. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 8(1), 118–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00033.brepl_PL
dc.referencesBrubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory & Society, 46, 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11186–017–9301–7pl_PL
dc.referencesBucy, E. P., Foley, J. M., Lukito, J., Doroshenko, L., Shah, D. V., Pevehouse, J. C., Wells, C. (2020). Performing populism: Trump’s transgressive debate style and the dynamics of Twitter response. New Media & Society, 22(4), 634–658. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444819893984pl_PL
dc.referencesCanovan, M. (2007). Polityka dla ludzi. Populizm jako ideologia demokracji. W: Y. Mény, Y. Surel (red.), Demokracja w obliczu populizmu (s. 57–82). Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.pl_PL
dc.referencesCasero-Ripollés, A., Sintes-Olivella, M., Franch, P. (2017). The Populist Political Communication Style in Action: Podemos’s Issues and Functions on Twitter During the 2016 Spanish General Election. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(9), 986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217707624pl_PL
dc.referencesCastells, M. (2013). Sieci oburzenia i nadziei. Ruchy społeczne w erze Internetu (O. Siara, tłum.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWNpl_PL
dc.referencesChadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDe Vreese, C., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: a new perspective. The International Journal of Press/ Politics, 23(4), 423–438.pl_PL
dc.referencesDiamond, L. (2010). Liberation Technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 69–83. DOI: 10.1353/jod.0.0190pl_PL
dc.referencesEllinas, A. A. (2010). The media and the far right in western Europe: Playing the nationalist card. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesEngesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697pl_PL
dc.referencesEngesser, S., Fawzi, N., Larsson, A. (2017). Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525pl_PL
dc.referencesEnli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi. org/10.1177/0267323116682802pl_PL
dc.referencesEnli, G. S., Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized Campaigns In Party-Centred Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330pl_PL
dc.referencesErnst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333pl_PL
dc.referencesErnst, N., Engesser, S., Esser, F. (2017). Bipolar Populism? The Use of Anti-Elitism and PeopleCentrism by Swiss Parties on Social Media. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(3), 253–261. doi:10.1111/spsr.12264pl_PL
dc.referencesErnst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 165–188. https://doi. org/10.1177/1940161218819430pl_PL
dc.referencesEsser, F., Stępińska, A., Hopmann, N. (2017). Populism and the media. Cross-national findings and perspectiveCommunication in Europe (s. 365–380). New YorkLondon: Routledge.s. W: T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. H. de Vreese (red.), Populist Politicalpl_PL
dc.referencesFieschi, C. (2019). Populocracy: The tyranny of authenticity and rise of populism. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlew, T., Iosifidis, P. (2020). Populism, globalisation and social media. International Communication Gazette, 82(1), 7–25. https://doi. org/10.1177/1748048519880721pl_PL
dc.referencesFreeden, M. (2013). The Morphological Analysis of Ideology. W: M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, M. Stears (red.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (s. 115–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGil de Zúñiga, H., Koc-Michalska, K., & Römmele, A. (2020). Populism in the era of Twitter: How social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society, 22(4), 585– 594. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893978pl_PL
dc.referencesGonawela, A., Pal, J., Thawani, U., van der Vlugt, E., Out, W., Chandra, P. (2018). Speaking their Mind: Populist Style and Antagonistic Messaging in the Tweets of Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Nigel Farage, and Geert Wilders. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 27, 293–326. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10606–018–9316–2pl_PL
dc.referencesGrill, C. (2016). How Anti-European, Populist Parties Campaigned in the 2014 EP Election. W: C. Holtz-Bacha (red.) Europawahlkampf 2014 (s. 75–96). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978–3–658–11020–8_5pl_PL
dc.referencesHaller, A., Holt, K. (2019). Paradoxical populism: how PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1665–1680. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449882pl_PL
dc.referencesHameleers, M. (2018). Augmenting polarization via social media? A comparative analysis of Trump’s and Wilders’ online populist communication and the electorate’s interpretations surrounding the elections. Acta Politica, 55(3), 331–350. doi:10.1057/s41269–018–0119–8pl_PL
dc.referencesHeiss, R., Matthes, J. (2020). Stuck in a Nativist Spiral: Content, Selection, and Effects of RightWing Populists’ Communication on Facebook. Political Communication, 37(3), 303–328. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2019.1661890pl_PL
dc.referencesHerkman, J. (2018). Old patterns on new clothes? Populism and political scandals in the Nordic countries. Acta Sociologica, 61(4), 341–355. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0001699317737816pl_PL
dc.referencesJacobs, K., Sandberg, L., Spierings, N. (2020). Twitter and Facebook: Populists’ double-barreled gun? New Media & Society, 22(4), 611–633. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444819893991pl_PL
dc.referencesJacobs, K., Spierings, N. (2019). A populist paradise? Examining populists’ Twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1681–1696. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883pl_PL
dc.referencesJakubowski, J. (2017). Populizm i social media. Małżeństwo z rozsądku? E-politikon, 24, 30–58.pl_PL
dc.referencesJungherr, A., Schroeder, R., Stier, S. (2019). Digital Media and the Surge of Political Outsiders: Explaining the Success of Political Challengers in the United States, Germany, and China. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1–12. doi:10.1177/2056305119875439pl_PL
dc.referencesKissas, A. (2020). Performative and ideological populism: The case of charismatic leaders on Twitter. Discourse & Society, 31(3), 268–284. https://doi. org/10.1177/0957926519889127pl_PL
dc.referencesKlinger, U., Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444814522952pl_PL
dc.referencesKrämer, B. (2014). Media Populism: A Conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on its Effects. Communication Theory, 24(1), 42–60. https://doi. org/10.1111/comt.12029pl_PL
dc.referencesKrämer, B. (2017). Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1293–1309. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520pl_PL
dc.referencesKrämer, B. (2018). Populism, Media, and the Form of Society. Communication Theory, 28(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty017pl_PL
dc.referencesKriesi, H. (2018). Revisiting the populist challenge. Czech Journal of Political Science, 25, 5–27.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrzyżanowski, M., Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the web. Populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krzpl_PL
dc.referencesLipiński, A., Stępińska, A. (2019). Polish RightWing Populism in the Era of Social Media. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(1), 71–82. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2018.1484667pl_PL
dc.referencesMatuszewski, P. (2018). Cyberplemiona. Analiza zachowań użytkowników Facebooka w trakcie kampanii parlamentarnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWNpl_PL
dc.referencesMazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the Media. W: D. Albertazzi, D. McDonnell (red.), Twenty-First Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy (s. 49–64). London: Palgrave Macmillanpl_PL
dc.referencesMazzoleni, G. (2014). Mediatization and political populism. W: F. Esser, J. Stromback (red.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies (s. 42–56). London: Palgrave Macmillanpl_PL
dc.referencesMazzoleni, G., Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially mediated populism: the communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/ s41599–018–0104-xpl_PL
dc.referencesMoffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism. Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford: Stanford University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesMoffitt, B. (2019). Populism 2.0 Social Media and the False Allure of “Unmediated” Representation. W: G. Fitzi, J. Mackert, B. S. Turner (red.), Populism and the Crisis of Democracy: Politics, Social Movements and Extremism, Vol. 2 (s. 30–46). London: Routledgepl_PL
dc.referencesMoffitt, B. (2020). Populism. Cambridge: Polity.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style.Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467–9248.12032pl_PL
dc.referencesMudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1477–7053.2004.00135.xpl_PL
dc.referencesMudde, C., Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesOtt, B. L. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686pl_PL
dc.referencesPain, P., Masullo Chen, G. (2019). The President Is in: Public Opinion and the Presidential Use of Twitter. Social Media + Society, 5(2), 1–12. https://doi. org/10.1177/2056305119855143pl_PL
dc.referencesRoemmele, A., Gibson, R. (2020). Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigning. New Media & Society, 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444819893979pl_PL
dc.referencesSalgado, S. (2019). Where’s populism? Online media and the diffusion of populist discourses and styles in Portugal. European Political Science, 18(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304–017–0137–4pl_PL
dc.referencesSalmela, M., von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi. org/10.1177/0539018417734419pl_PL
dc.referencesSaurette, P., Gunster, S. (2011). Ears wide shut: Epistemological populism, argutainment and Canadian conservative talk radio. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 195–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423910001095pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmidt, F. (2020). Party Populism and Media Access: The News Value of Populist Communication and How It Is Handled by the Mass Media. International Journal of Communication, 14(23), 2360–2382. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/ view/11882pl_PL
dc.referenceschmuck, D., Hameleers, M. (2020). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1531–1548. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909pl_PL
dc.referencesSchroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet: Media, technology and globalization. London: UCL Presspl_PL
dc.referencesSorensen, L. (2018). Populist communication in the new media environment: a cross-regional comparative perspective. Palgrave Communications, 4(48), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599–018–0101–0pl_PL
dc.referencesStanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110. DOI: 10.1080/13569310701822289pl_PL
dc.referencesStanyer, J., Salgado, S., Strömbäck, J. (2016). Populist Actors as Communicators or Political Actors as Populist Communicators: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives. W: T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, C. de Vreese (red.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (s. 353–364). New York: Routledge.pl_PL
dc.referencesStier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728pl_PL
dc.referencesSuiter, J., Culloty, E., Greene, D., Siapera, E. (2018). Hybrid media and populist currents in Ireland’s 2016 General Election. European Journal of Communication, 33(4), 396–412. https://doi. org/10.1177/0267323118775297pl_PL
dc.referencesŠori, I., Ivanova, V. (2018). Right-wing populist convergences and spillovers in hybrid media systems. W: M. Pajnik, B. Sauer (red.), Populism and the Web: Communicative Practices of Parties and Movements in Europe (s. 55–71). London-New York: Routledgepl_PL
dc.referencesUrbinati, N. (2019). Me the people: How populism transforms democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesVan Kessel, S., Castelein, R. (2016). Shifting the blame. Populist politicians’ use of Twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(2), 594–614pl_PL
dc.referencesWahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Media coverage of shifting emotional regimes: Donald Trump’s angry populism. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772190pl_PL
dc.referencesWaisbord, S. (2018). Why Populism is Troubling for Democratic Communication. Communication. Culture and Critique , 11(1), 21–34. https://doi. org/10.1093/ccc/tcx005.pl_PL
dc.referencesWaisbord, S., Amado, A. (2017). Populist com - munication by digital means: presiden - tial Twitter in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1330–1346. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521pl_PL
dc.referencesWettstein, M., Esser, F., Schulz, A., Wirz, D. S., Wirth, W. (2018). News Media as Gatekeepers, Critics, and Initiators of Populist Communication: How Journalists in Ten Countries Deal with the Populist Challenge. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 23(4), 476–495. https://doi. org/10.1177/1940161218785979pl_PL
dc.referencesWeyland, K. (2017). Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach, W: C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, P. Ostiguy (red.), Oxford Handbook of Populism (s. 48–72). Oxford: Oxford University Presspl_PL
dc.referencesWeyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics , 34(1), 1–22. doi:10.2307/422412pl_PL
dc.referencesWodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear. What right wing populist discourses mean? London: Sagepl_PL
dc.referencesZulianello, M., Albertini, A., Ceccobelli, D. (2018). A Populist Zeitgeist? The Communication Strategies of Western and Latin American Political Leaders on Facebook. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 439–457. https://doi. org/10.1177/1940161218783836pl_PL
dc.disciplinenauki socjologicznepl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe