Show simple item record

Types of Rationality in Discourses on Work in (Post)Transformation Poland

dc.contributor.authorKubala, Konrad
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-05T12:48:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-05T12:48:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/42689
dc.description.abstractRationality is the key concept for understanding the reproduction of social life in the era of reflexive modernization. A fusion of lessons learned from the constructivist view of the world and analysis of the hermeneutic category of pre-understanding has become the basis of my belief that rationality is nowadays the basic modal concept, and the forms of its existence shape the order of social life. In my research practice, rationality has become a link between my interest in work and the theory of social order development. In this paper, I briefly present the relations between the notion of rationality and the theory of reflexive modernization. Then, I present my research path and the tools used in the analyses. The most important part is devoted to the effects of the conducted research. I classify and describe the types of rationality present in discourses on work in Poland. The discourses of politicians, experts, and the so-called “ordinary people” were analyzed.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;3en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectRationalityen
dc.subjectType of Rationalityen
dc.subjectWorken
dc.subjectReflexive Modernizationen
dc.subjectPolanden
dc.titleTypes of Rationality in Discourses on Work in (Post)Transformation Polanden
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number70-85
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesBeck, Ulrich. 1998. “Politics of Risk Society.” Pp. 9-22 in The Politics of Risk Society, edited by J. Franklin. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesBeck, Ulrich. 2005. Władza i przeciwwładza w epoce globalnej. Nowa ekonomia polityki światowej [Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.en
dc.referencesBeck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens, and Scott Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesBourdieu, Pierre and Loïc Wacquant, eds. 2008. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesBurszta, Wojciech et al. 2017. “Dyskusja: Modernizacja, praca, przedsiębiorczość w polskich dyskursach (post)transformacyjnych [Discussion: Modernization, Work, Entrepreneurship in Polish (Post)Transformational Discourses].” Władza Sądzenia 11:12-31.en
dc.referencesChouliaraki, Lilie and Norman Fairclough. 2002. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.en
dc.referencesCzyżewski, Marek, Kinga Dunin, and Andrzej Piotrowski, eds. 2010. Cudze problemy: o ważności tego, co nieważne: analiza dyskursu publicznego w Polsce [Somebody Else’s Problems: On the Importance of What Is Unimportant: Analysis of Public Discourse in Poland]. 2nd ed. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.en
dc.referencesCzyżewski, Marek, Sergiusz Kowalski, and Andrzej Piotrowski. 2010. Rytualny chaos. Studium dyskursu publicznego [Ritual Chaos. Study of Public Discourse]. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.en
dc.referencesDijk, Teun Adrianus van. 2001. Dyskurs jako struktura i proces: praca zbiorowa [Discourse as Structure and Process]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Naukowe PWN.en
dc.referencesDuszak, Anna and Norman Fairclough. 2008. Krytyczna analiza dyskursu: interdyscyplinarne podejście do komunikacji społecznej [Critical Discourse Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Social Communication]. Cracow: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych Universitas.en
dc.referencesFairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London, New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1988. “Politics and Reason.” Pp. 57-85 in Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984, edited by L. D. Kritzman. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2010. Bezpieczeństwo, terytorium, populacja [Security, Territory, Population]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en
dc.referencesGarfinkel, Harold. 1984. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesGiddens, Anthony. 1997. The Consequences of Modernity. 6th ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesGrice, Paul. 1980. “Logika i konwersacja [Logic and Conversation].” Pp. 91-114 w Język w świetle nauki [Language in the Light of Science], edited by B. Stanosz. Warsaw: Czytelnik.en
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen. 2007a. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.en
dc.referencesHabermas, Jürgen. 2007b. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.en
dc.referencesKamberelis, George and Greg Dimitriadis. 2014. “Wywiady zogniskowane. Strategiczne artykulacje pedagogiki, polityki i badań [Focus Interviews. Strategic Articulations of Pedagogy, Politics, and Research].” Pp. 351-390 in Metody badań jakościowych [Qualitative Research Methods], vol. 2, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en
dc.referencesKubala, Konrad. 2019. Racjonalność w dyskursach o pracy w Polsce (po) transformacyjnej [Rationality in Discourses on Work in (Post)Transformational Poland]. Lodz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.en
dc.referencesLakoff, George. 2014. The All-New Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.en
dc.referencesLuhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesMills, C. Wright. 2000. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesParsons, Talcott. 1991. The Social System. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 1982. Collected Papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.en
dc.referencesSchütz, Alfred. 2008. O wielości światów. Szkice z socjologii fenomenologicznej [On Multiple Realities]. Cracow: Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.en
dc.referencesWeber, Max. 2002. Gospodarka i społeczeństwo: zarys socjologii rozumiejącej [Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en
dc.referencesWeber, Max. 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesWoroniecka, Grażyna. 2003. Interakcja symboliczna a hermeneutyczna kategoria przed-rozumienia [Symbolic Interaction and the Hermeneutic Category of Pre-Understanding]. Warsaw: Oficyna Naukowa.en
dc.referencesWynne, Brian. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.” Pp. 44-83 in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailkonrad.kubala@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.18.3.03
dc.relation.volume18


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
70-85_Kubala.pdf
Size:
986.8Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0