Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanaszczyk, Małgorzata
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-12T10:25:40Z
dc.date.available2014-05-12T10:25:40Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1427-969X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/4454
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to show that interpretation of observed objects depends on the context (in this case context was the advertisement) in which they are seen. The second goal was to show the equivalence of two methods used to investigate similarity between objects – affinity index and comparison in pairs. The group of 180 people aged 19–32 participated in the study. They valuated similarity between three identical objects but advertised in three different ways. Using multidimensional scaling method the perception maps of the three products were created. Data unequivocally proved that they were seen as dissimilar. The Pindis procedure revealed that both methods used to investigate similarity are methodologically equivalent. They can be used interchangeably.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.subjectperception in advertisingpl_PL
dc.subjectsimilaritypl_PL
dc.titlePercepcja produktu w kontekście przekazu reklamowego – analiza na podstawie dwu metod badania podobieństwapl_PL
dc.title.alternativeProduct perception in the advertisement context -analysis based on two methods of investigating similaritypl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number175-188pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record