Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorCantero-Galiano, Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T08:19:37Z
dc.date.available2022-12-19T08:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-23
dc.identifier.issn2391-6478
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/44725
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article/hypothesis: The aim of this work is to delve into the significance of trust in the phenomenon of tax compliance. Specifically, the relationship between taxpayers’ trust in the Government, administrations and institutions and their reported disposition towards tax compliance is explored based on the case of Spain and at regional level (NUTS2). Methodology: Using 2017 data collected by the European Values Study (EVS) and the Quality of Government Institute at the University of Gothenburg (QoG), a multilevel linear model is proposed where we assess the impact of citizen support for the Government and institutions on the disposition towards tax compliance. This model allows to simultaneously capture the relationships at taxpayer level and the effects of regional factors in the same equation. Results of the research: The results of the multilevel estimation allow the authors to reject the null hypothesis and accept, at least provisionally, the existence of a direct effect of trust in the institutions on tax compliance at regional level. Additionally, the low significance observed in the regional level variables suggests that citizens have non-decentralized perception of tax obligations. Furthermore, given that the effects are measured in terms of the quality of the institutions and government, the implications for regional policy and the actions of regional governments are of significant interest for the study of tax behavior and compliance.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFinanse i Prawo Finansowepl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjecttax complianceen
dc.subjecttrusten
dc.subjecttax behavioren
dc.subjectslippery slope frameworken
dc.subjectmultilevel analysisen
dc.titleTrust in Institutions and Tax Compliance. A Multilevel Analysis of the Regions of Spainen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number81-97
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economic and Business Sciences, University of Castilla-La Manchaen
dc.identifier.eissn2353-5601
dc.referencesAllingham, M.G. and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Taxation: critical perspectives on the world economy, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2en
dc.referencesAlm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272en
dc.referencesAlm, J., Kirchler, E. and Muehlbacher, S. (2012). Combining psychology and economics in the analysis of compliance: From enforcement to cooperation. Economic analysis and Policy, 42(2).en
dc.referencesAlm, J., Sanchez, I. and Juan, A. (1995). Economic and noneconomic factors in tax compliance. Kyklos, 48(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1995.tb02312.xen
dc.referencesBecker, G.S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 76(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259394en
dc.referencesBraithwaite, V. (2002). A new approach to tax compliance. In: V. Braithwaite, ed. Taxing democracy. Hants: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315241746-6en
dc.referencesBrezina, P., Eberhartinger, E. and Zieser, M. (2021). The Future of Tax Audits? The Acceptance of Online-Based, Automated Tax Audits and their Effects on Trust and Power (January 1, 2021). WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, 2021-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3769337en
dc.referencesCharron, N., Lapuente, V. and Annoni, P. (2019). Measuring quality of government in EU regions across space and time. Papers in Regional Science, 98(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12437en
dc.referencesde Widt, D. (2017). Dutch horizontal monitoring: The handicap of a head start. Umeå universitet.en
dc.referencesEberhartinger, E. and Zieser, M. (2021). The Effects of Cooperative Compliance on Firms’ Tax Risk, Tax Risk Management and Compliance Costs. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 73(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-021-00108-6en
dc.referencesEVS (2020). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7500, Data file Version 4.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13560en
dc.referencesFeld, L.P. and Frey, B.S. (2002). Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers are Treated. Economics of Governance, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101010100032en
dc.referencesFord, C. and Condon, M. (2011). Introduction to 'New Governance and the Business Organization’. Law & Policy, 33(4).en
dc.referencesFrank, R.H. (1991). Microeconomics and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.en
dc.referencesFrey, B.S. (2003). Deterrence and tax morale in the European Union. European Review, 11(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1062798703000346en
dc.referencesGaisbauer, H.P., Schweiger, G. and Sedmak, C. (2015). Outlining the field of tax justice. In Philosophical explorations of justice and taxation. Cham: Springer.en
dc.referencesHox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.en
dc.referencesIEF (2021). Opiniones y actitudes fiscales de los españoles en 2020. Documentos de Trabajo del IEF, 5.en
dc.referencesKirchler, E., Hoelzl, E. and Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic psychology, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004en
dc.referencesLago-Peñas, I. and Lago-Peñas, S. (2008). The determinants of tax morale in comparative perspective: Evidence from a multilevel analysis. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales Working Paper, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1321437en
dc.referencesLong, S.B. and Swingen, J.A. (1991). Taxpayer compliance: Setting new agendas for research. Law and Society Review, 25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053731en
dc.referencesLuke, D.A. (2004). Multilevel modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en
dc.referencesOECD (2008). Study into the role of tax intermediaries. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264041813-enen
dc.referencesOECD (2010). Understanding and Influencing Taxpayers’ Compliance Behaviour. Paris: OECD Publishing.en
dc.referencesOECD (2013). Co-operative Compliance: A Framework from Enhanced Relationship to Co-operative Compliance. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264200852-enen
dc.referencesOECD (2014a). Measures of Tax Compliance Outcomes: A Practical Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264223233-enen
dc.referencesOECD (2014b). International tax terms, https://www.oecd.org/ctp/33967016.pdf [Accessed 2.11.2021].en
dc.referencesOECD (2014c). Tax Compliance by Design: Achieving Improved SME Tax Compliance by Adopting a System Perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264223219-enen
dc.referencesPardo, A., Ruiz, M.A. and San Martín, R. (2007). Cómo ajustar e interpretar modelos multinivel con SPSS. Psicothema, 19(2), https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72719220 [Accessed 25.04.2022].en
dc.referencesPrest, A.R. (1983). Fiscal Policy. In: P. Coffey, ed., Main Economic Policy Areas of the EEC. Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2130-1_3en
dc.referencesPrinz, A., Muehlbacher, S. and Kirchler, E. (2014). The slippery slope framework on tax compliance: An attempt to formalization. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.04.004en
dc.referencesRandlane, K. (2016). Tax Compliance as a System: Mapping the Field. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1028636en
dc.referencesRaudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F. and Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.en
dc.referencesRaudenbush, S.W. and Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Advanced quantitative technique. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.en
dc.referencesSchmölders, G. (2006). The psychology of money and public finance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230625112en
dc.referencesSrinivasan, T.N. (1973). Tax evasion: A model. Journal of Publics Economics, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(73)90024-8en
dc.references(www1) https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government/qog-data/data-downloads/eu-regional-dataseten
dc.references(www2) https://qog.pol.gu.se/data/datadownloads/qog-eqi-dataen
dc.contributor.authorEmailjesus.cgaliano@uclm.es
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2391-6478.S.2022.06


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0