dc.contributor.author | Bezkowska, Grażyna | |
dc.contributor.editor | Stasiak, Andrzej | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-17T15:44:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-17T15:44:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bezkowska, G. (2005). Znaczenie estetyki krajobrazu w określaniu walorów turystycznych. Turystyka i Hotelarstwo, 8, 43-59. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.issn | 1644-8871 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/46736 | |
dc.description.abstract | In disciplines dealing with landscape researchers increasingly tend to consider landscape as a geographico-psychological reality. The flow of information coming out from the landscape to the observer generates sensations that determine the observer’s reactions. The reception of information depends on personal characteristics: sex, age, sensitivity, psychological conditions, and frame of mind. Of great importance here are person’s education, knowledge, experiences, and culture. Researches on perception of the geographical environment laid the basis for the perceptual geography and demonstrated the importance of landscape physiognomy as an asset for tourism and recreation.
Visual quality of landscape is assessed from the point of view of esthetic emotions felt by tourists and recreationists. The beauty of landscape is taken into consideration as a factor in valorizing the natural environment for purposes of tourism and recreation and in arranging recreational areas. Sight is the main sense responsible for landscape perception. Therefore to examine visual attractiveness of landscapes and landscape preferences researchers often use pictures as a basis of questionnaire surveys.
This paper is based on surveys conducted among 117 geography of tourism graduates. The respondents have been shown pictures representing 14 different types of visual landscapes found in central Poland. The landscape types varied as to the number of picture planes, degree of anthropization, arrangement of elements, intensity of light. The respondents were asked about their personal feelings, reactions toward particular pictures and preferred recreation environment. When asked to classify landscapes into the category ‘nice’ the respondents most often indicated open or semi-open landscape with colourful foreground (24.3%) or natural bright landscape with water (20.8%). Devastated landscapes, grey or with built-up horizon were most often classified as ‘ugly’. These types of landscapes, according to the respondents, evoke negative feelings such as sadness and depression.
Natural landscapes with abundant and colourful vegetation and bodies of water were indicated as preferred type of recreation environment. On the other hand, open void landscapes as well as closed forest landscapes, particularly with dark coniferous forests, were considered unsuitable for recreation and tourist activities. The same refers to disordered landscapes with visible anthropogenic destruction. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Turystyki i Hotelarstwa w Łodzi | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Turystyka i Hotelarstwo; | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Znaczenie estetyki krajobrazu w określaniu walorów turystycznych | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Significance of the esthetic quality of natural landscape as a tourist asset | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 43-59 | pl_PL |
dc.references | Antrop M., 1982, The natural way visual image interpretation for land classification and landscapeplanning, Act. du Symp. Inst. de la Comm., Soc. Inter. de Photogrametrie et Teledetection, vol. 1, Toulose. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bartkowski 1983, O pojęciu krajobrazu. Materiały z konferencji: „Dyskusja nad pojęciem ekologii krajobrazu”, Poznań. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bezkowska G., 2003a, Problemy oceny walorów przyrodniczych dla turystyki i rekreacji na obszarze Nizin Środkowopolskich, Turystyka i Hotelarstwo, 4. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bezkowska G., 2003b, Atrakcyjność środowiska przyrodniczego doliny Odry dla turystyki i rekreacji, [w:] Liszewski S. (red.), Możliwości i kierunki rozwoju turystyki w dolinie Odry, ŁTN, Łódź. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bogdanowski J., Łuczyńska M., Novak Z., 1981, Architektura krajobrazu, PWN, Warszawa–Kraków. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Kowalczyk A., 1992, Badanie spostrzegania krajobrazu multisensorycznego – podstawą kształtowania obszarów rekreacyjnych, Wyd. Uczelniane WSP, Bydgoszcz. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Krzymowska-Kostrowicka A., 1997, Geoekologia turystyki i wypoczynku, Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Pietrzak M. 1998, Syntezy krajobrazowe, Założenia, problemy, zastosowania, Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Richling A., Solon J., 1994, Ekologia krajobrazu, Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Staszczuk J., 1990, Las w wyobrażeniach środowiskowych wypoczywających, [w:] Rekreacyjne użytkowanie lasów, Wyd. AWF, Warszawa. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Styperek J., 2002, Linearne systemy penetracji rekreacyjnej, Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wojciechowski K., 1986, Problemy percepcji i oceny estetycznej krajobrazu, Rozprawy Habilitacyjne UMCS, nr 27, Lublin. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wojciechowski K., 1993, Atrakcyjność wizualna krajobrazów jako składnik walorów rekreacyjnych, [w:] Ekologia krajobrazu w badaniach terytorialnych systemów rekreacyjnych, Poznań. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wyrzykowski J., 1986, Geograficzne uwarunkowania rozwoju turystyki urlopowej w Polsce, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, nr 935, Wrocław. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 8 | pl_PL |
dc.discipline | geografia społeczno-ekonomiczna i gospodarka przestrzenna | pl_PL |