Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPinder, Morgan
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-27T12:46:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-27T12:46:54Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-27
dc.identifier.issn2391-8551
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/52247
dc.description.abstractAs we sit at the precipice of this planet’s sixth mass extinction event, we need to use every tool at our disposal to advocate for our ecologies. Human self-interest and anthropocentric thinking act as barriers to communicating ecocrisis. Cozy video games can create safe spaces to explore the ecological effects of human actions with the aim of prompting reflection and action on environmental issues. Drawing on ecocritical video game scholarship, the aim of this article is to explore the ways in which environments are represented and interacted with in selected cozy video games. Through an examination of the extractivist colonial processes and narratives of Animal Crossing: New Horizons, in contrast with the complex ecocritical coziness of Terra Nil, this article posits that cozy games have the potential to achieve effective environmental communication. Both Animal Crossing: New Horizons and Terra Nil successfully empower the player to shape their environment but only Terra Nil affords ecological empowerment. By creating a safe space to engage with environments and even ecocrisis, cozy games allow players the agency to construct their own econarratives and may challenge or perpetuate anthropocentric ideas about the environment.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReplay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectcozy gamesen
dc.subjectecocriticismen
dc.subjectextractivismen
dc.subject'Animal Crossing: New Horizons'en
dc.subject'Terra Nil'en
dc.titleNegotiating Anthropocentrism and Ecologies in Cozy Gamesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number125-136
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDeakin Universityen
dc.identifier.eissn2449-8394
dc.referencesAcosta, A. (2013). Extractivism and Neoextractivism: Two Sides of the Same Curse. In: M. Lang & D. Mokrani (Eds.), Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America (pp. 61–86). Transnational Institute and Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.en
dc.referencesBogost, I. (2008). The Rhetoric of Video Games. In: K.S. Tekinbaş (Ed.), The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning (pp. 117–140). MIT Press.en
dc.referencesBohunicky, K.M. (2014). Ecocomposition: Writing Ecologies in Digital Games. Green Letters, 18(3): 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2014.964283en
dc.referencesChang, A.Y. (2019). Playing Nature: Ecology in Video Games. University of Minnesota Press.en
dc.referencesCoffey, Y., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Islam, M.S., & Usher, K. (2021). Understanding Eco-Anxiety: A Systematic Scoping Review of Current Literature and Identified Knowledge Gaps. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100047en
dc.referencesCondis, M. (2020). Sorry, Wrong Apocalypse: Horizon Zero Dawn, Heaven’s Vault, and the Ecocritical Videogame. Game Studies, 20(3).en
dc.referencesCoroller, S. & Flinois, C. (2023). Video Games as a Tool for Ecological Learning: The Case of Animal Crossing. Ecosphere, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4463en
dc.referencesCrowley, S. (2023). Playing Farmer: At the Intersections of Neo-Liberal Capitalism and Ecocriticism in Stardew Valley. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 15(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00069_1en
dc.referencesHeise, U.K. (2006). The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Ecocriticism. PMLA, 121(2), 503–516.en
dc.referencesHeise, U.K. (2019). Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesHo, M.-T., Nguyen, T.-H.T., Nguyen, M.-H., La, V.-P., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2022). Good Ethics Cannot Stop Me from Exploiting: The Good and Bad of Anthropocentric Attitudes in a Game Environment. Ambio, 51(11), 2294–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01742-yen
dc.referencesHuggan, G. & Tiffin, H. (2015). Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. Routledge.en
dc.referencesMoser, S.C. (2010). Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11en
dc.referencesNavarro-Remesal, V. (2019). Pixelated Nature: Ecocriticism, Animals, Moral Consideration, and Degrowth in Videogames. Logos, 26(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.12957/logos.2019.46108en
dc.referencesNixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesShort, T.X., Ordon, A., Hurd, D., Howe, C., Forbes, J., Eiserloh, S., Diaz, J., Cook, D., & Meiners, R. (2018, January 24). Cozy Games. Lostgarden. Online: https://lostgarden.home.blog/2018/01/24/cozy-games/ (accessed on March 3, 2024).en
dc.referencesVan Ooijen, E. (2018). The Killability of Fish in The Sims 3: Pets and Stardew Valley. The Computer Games Journal, 7(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-018-0055-xen
dc.referencesWaszkiewicz, A. & Bakun, M. (2020). Towards the Aesthetics of Cozy Video Games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 12(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00017_1en
dc.referencesConcerned Ape. (2016). Stardew Valley. Concerned Ape.en
dc.referencesDU&I. (2020). Casts Organized Neatly. DU&I.en
dc.referencesFree Lives. (2023). Terra Nil. Devolver Digital.en
dc.referencesNintendo. (2020). Animal Crossing: New Horizons. Nintendo.en
dc.referencesWitch Beam. (2021). Unpacking. Humble Bundle.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailmkpinder@deakin.edu.au
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2391-8551.11.09
dc.relation.volume11


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0