Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorAftowicz, Agata
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T07:08:40Z
dc.date.available2025-04-09T07:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-31
dc.identifier.issn2391-6478
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/55314
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article. The purpose of the article is to systematize knowledge in the field of green bond standards as well as examine the differences between the most popular of them. The aim is to question whether the requirements of individual standards actually reduce information asymmetry on the part of investors in the market.Methodology. The texts of the 5 most popular green bond standards in the world were analyzed and were compared with each other, outlining the 5 most important categories in the context of information asymmetry, according to the author. The work contains the comparison of the standards and identifies the differences between them.Results of the research. The results of the research can be summarized as follows. The conducted research allowed for the identification of differences between individual standards and the assessment of whether these differences have a significant impact on the asymmetry of information in the green bond market. The study results show that green bond standards are not an ideal way to reduce the negative effects of information asymmetry in the market. The study shows the need to standardize the requirements for issuers who want to have a certificate that is an actual confirmation of high-quality green bonds in order to eliminate information asymmetry in the market.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Finance and Financial Law;45en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectgreen bondsen
dc.subjectgreen bond marketen
dc.subjectsustainable financeen
dc.subjectgreen bond standardsen
dc.subjectinformation asymmetryen
dc.titleGreen bond standards as a way to reduce information asymmetryen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number35-49
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSGH Warsaw School of Economics, The SGH Doctoral Schoolen
dc.identifier.eissn2353-5601
dc.referencesAndenas, M., & Heidemann, M. (2023). From "Green Bond Principles" to "Green Bond Clauses": Mitigating greenwashing through contract law. In Quo Vadis Commercial Contract? (pp. 151–171). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14105-8_6en
dc.referencesASEAN Green Bond Standards. (2019). ACMF. https://www.theacmf.org/initiatives/sustainable-finance/asean-green-bond-standardsen
dc.referencesASEAN Social Bond Standards. (2019). ACMF. https://www.theacmf.org/initiatives/sustainable-finance/asean-social-bond-standardsen
dc.referencesASEAN Sustainability Bond Standards. (2019). ACMF. https://www.theacmf.org/initiatives/sustainable-finance/asean-sustainability-bond-standardsen
dc.referencesASEAN Sustainability-Linked Bond Standards. (2022). ACMF. https://www.theacmf.org/sustainable-finance/publications/asean-sustainability-linked-bond-standardsen
dc.referencesBachelet, M., Becchetti, L., & Manfredonia, S. (2019). The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The role of issuer characteristics and third-party verification. Sustainability, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041098en
dc.referencesBjorkholm, L., & Lehner, O. (2021). Nordic green bond issuers’ view on the upcoming EU Green Bond Standard. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 10, 222–279. https://doi.org/10.35944/jofrp.2021.10.1.012en
dc.referencesClimate Bond Standard. (2023). https://www.climatebonds.net/climate-bonds-standard-v4en
dc.referencesCortellini, G., & Panetta, I. (2021). Green Bond: A systematic literature review for future research agendas. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120589en
dc.referencesFlammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142, 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010en
dc.referencesGreen Bond Endorsed Projects Catalogue. (2021). http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/4342400/2021091617180089879.pdfen
dc.referencesGreen Bond Principles. (2021). ICMA. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2022-updates/Green-Bond-Principles-June-2022-060623.pdfen
dc.referencesGyura, G. (2020). Green Bonds and Green Bond Funds: The quest for the real impact. Journal of Alternative Investments, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2020.1.098en
dc.referencesICMA. (2021). Sustainability Bond Principles. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2021-updates/Sustainability-Bond-Guidelines-June-2021-140621.pdfen
dc.referencesICMA. (2024). Sustainability-linked Bond Principles. https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Sustainable-finance/2024-updates/Sustainability-Linked-Bond-Principles-June-2024.pdfen
dc.referencesKeitel, S., & Öner, M. (2023). Green Bonds and the current challenge of greenwashing. In C. Catak & M. Öner (Eds.), Sustainable Finance (pp. 113–128). https://doi.org/10.3726/b21415en
dc.referencesKovacevic, V., Jankovic, I., Vasic, V., & Ljumovic, I. (2023). Does transparency pay off for green bonds’ issuers? Evidence from EU state agencies’ green bonds. Ekonomika Poloprovreda - Economics of Agriculture, 70(4). https://doi.org/10.59267/ekoPolj2304997Ken
dc.referencesKultys-Grabowska, A. (2023). Europejskie zielone obligacje – ich specyfika na tle dotychczasowych instrumentów. Czasopisma PAN. https://publikacje.pan.pl/chapter/127146/2023-kultys-grabowska-aleksandra-zielone-finanse-europejskie-zielone-obligacje-ich-specyfika-na-tle-dotychczasowych-instrumentow-br?language=enen
dc.referencesLaskowska, A. (2017). The green bond as a prospective instrument of the global debt market. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2017.023en
dc.referencesLin, L., & Hong, Y. (2022). Developing a Green Bonds Market: Lessons from China. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00231-1en
dc.referencesLoffler, K., Petreski, A., & Stephan, A. (2021). Drivers of green bond issuance and new evidence on the "greenium". Eurasian Economic Review, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-020-00165-yen
dc.referencesLu, C., Chen, T., & Liao, H. (2010). Information uncertainty, information asymmetry and corporate bond yield spreads. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.02.013en
dc.referencesMalecki, C. (2023). The EU proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities on 13 June 2023: The missing piece of sustainable finance regulation. Law and Financial Markets Review, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2024.2347061en
dc.referencesMaltais, A., & Nykvist, B. (2020). Understanding the role of green bonds in advancing sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20430795.2020.1724864en
dc.referencesMarket analytics – ICMA. (2024). https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/sustainable-bonds-database/en
dc.referencesMarket Data – CBI. (2024). https://www.climatebonds.net/market/data/en
dc.referencesOECD. (2017). Mobilising bond markets for a low-carbon transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264272323-enen
dc.referencesOkafor, A., Adusei, M., & Edo, O. (2024). Effects of the utilization of green bonds proceeds on green bond premium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143131en
dc.referencesPham, L. (2016). Is it risky to go green? A volatility analysis of the green bond market. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1237244en
dc.referencesPohl, C., Schuler, G., & Schiereck, D. (2023). Borrower- and lender-specific determinants in the pricing of sustainability-linked loans. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135652en
dc.referencesProkop, J., & Muller, R. (2023). Green Bond Financing and Corporate Environmental Performance. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 10(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10061en
dc.referencesPyka, M. (2023). The EU Green Bond Standard: A plausible response to the deficiencies of the EU Green Bond Market? European Business Organization Law Review, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-023-00278-2en
dc.referencesRegulation (EU) 2023/2631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 September 2023 on Sustainable Finance. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32023R2631en
dc.referencesSamgiorgi, I., & Schopohl, L. (2021). Why do institutional investors buy green bonds: Evidence from a survey of European asset managers. International Review of Financial Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101738en
dc.referencesŚlażyńska-Kluczek, D. (2022). Zielone obligacje jako metoda finansowania projektów inwestycyjnych. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 1(2022). https://doi.org/10.33119/KNoP.2022.63.1.3en
dc.referencesSobik, B. (2023). Green bonds – financial innovation for sustainability financing: The case of the Polish green bond market and their development barriers. Central European Economic Journal, 10(57). https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2023-0017en
dc.referencesWang, J., Tang, J., & Guo, K. (2022). Green Bond Index Prediction Based on CEEMDAN-LSTM. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.793413en
dc.referencesWang, S., & Wang, D. (2022). Exploring the relationship between ESG performance and green bond issuance. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.897577en
dc.referencesZioło, M., Spoz, A., & Julińska-Sadłocha, E. (2021). Zrównoważone rynki finansowe. Perspektywa krajowa i międzynarodowa. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailaa116875@doktorant.sgh.waw.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2391-6478.1.45.02
dc.relation.volume1


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/