Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaźmierska, Kaja
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-07T08:31:18Z
dc.date.available2025-05-07T08:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/55547
dc.description.abstractThe article presents the analysis of two cases of women reconstructed based on autobiographical narrative interviews. They are mothers of many children and are active online, having accounts on Instagram and creating content. Most research focused on the activities of online creators is based on an analysis of their web content. Due to the type of research data, autobiographical narratives and the interpretations of one’s biographical experiences and actions are the main frame of this analysis. Both narrators represent contemporary modern women, combining opposing patterns of tradition and modernity, which are often presented in public discourses as contradictory or mutually excluding. Internet activity seems to remedy the accompanying experience of tension and supports women’s biographical work. What stands out is the identity work undertaken by the two narrators, whose frame of reference is the tension between the planned and voluntary entry into traditionally understood motherhood and the plan for one’s development inscribed in the identity of an educated modern woman socialized in a culture of individualism. In this respect, their online activity appears to have a compensatory function in their biographies.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMotherhooden
dc.subjectLarge Familyen
dc.subjectOnline Creatoren
dc.subjectAutobiographical Narrativeen
dc.titleThe Biographical Experience of Being a Stay-at-Home Mother of a Large Family Versus Online Activity. A Case Studyen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number34-55
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodzen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesArcher, Catherine. 2019. “How Influencer ‘Mumpreneur’ Bloggers and ‘Everyday’ Mums Frame Presenting Their Children Online.” Media International Australia 170(1):47-56.en
dc.referencesBadinter, Elisabeth. 1982. The Myth of Motherhood: An Historical View of the Maternal Instinct. London: Souvenir Press.en
dc.referencesBańczyk, Emilia. 2021. “Internetowa madka jako wariant stereotypu współczesnej matki [Internet Mudda as a Variant of the Stereotype of a Modern Mother].” Język Polski 101:71-86.en
dc.referencesBlum-Ross, Alicia and Sonia Livingstone. 2017. “Sharenting: Parent Blogging and the Boundaries of the Digital Self.” Popular Communication 15(2):110-125.en
dc.referencesBoguszewski, Rafał. 2019. Rodzina – jej znaczenie i rozumienie [Family—Its Meaning and Understanding]. CBOS. Retrieved January 12, 2025, https://cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2019/K_022_19.PDF.en
dc.referencesBrosch, Anna. 2016. “When the Child is Born in the Internet: Sharenting as a Growing Trend among Parents on Facebook.” The New Educational Review 43(1):225-235.en
dc.referencesCampbell, Colin and Pamela E. Grimm. 2019. “The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 38(1):110-123.en
dc.referencesChrostowska, Bożena. 2018. “Sharenting – skala i wielowymiarowość zjawiska (nierozważnego) ujawniania przez rodziców informacji o dzieciach w mediach społecznościowych [Sharenting—The Scale and Multidimensionality of the Phenomenon of the Parents (Inconsiderately) Disclosing the Information about Their Children in the Social Media].” Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji 43(4):58-68.en
dc.referencesDemir, Melek and Meryem Vural Batik. 2024. “Wendy Syndrome as ‘Super Mother’: A Scale Development.” HAYEF: Journal of Education 21:139-145.en
dc.referencesGe, Jing and Urlike Gretzel. 2018. “Emoji Rhetoric: A Social Media Influencer Perspective.” Journal of Marketing Management 34(15-16):1272-1295.en
dc.referencesGolczyńska-Grondas, Agnieszka and Katarzyna Waniek. 2020. “Transforming Opportunity Structures: Biographical Chances, Hopes, Illusions, and Dead-Ends.” Pp. 281-296 in Telling the Great Change. The Process of the Systemic Transformation in Poland in Biographical Perspective, edited by K. Kaźmierska and K. Waniek. Lodz: WUŁ.en
dc.referencesGotwald, Beata, Bogdan Gregod, and Marlena Kowalczyk. 2024. “Parental Perspectives on Sharenting: Attitudes, Privacy Concerns, and Children’s Digital Footprint.” European Research Studies Journal 27:759-767.en
dc.referencesGromkowska-Melosik, Agnieszka. 2011. Edukacja i (nie)równość społeczna kobiet. Studium dynamiki dostępu [Education and (In) Equality of Women. A Study of the Dynamics of Access]. Cracow: Impuls.en
dc.referencesGromkowska-Melosik, Agnieszka. 2017. “Rekonstrukcje tożsamości współczesnych kobiet. Paradoksy emancypacji [Reconstruction of the Contemporary Woman’s Identity. Paradoxes of Emancipation].” Pedagogika Społeczna 2(64):95-116.en
dc.referencesHansen Shaevitz, Marjorie. 2000. The Confident Woman: Learn the Rules of the Game. New York: Three Rivers Press.en
dc.referencesHays, Sharon. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en
dc.referencesHryciuk, Renata E. and Elżbieta Korolczuk, eds. 2012. Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? Dyskursy, praktyki i reprezentacje macierzyństwa we współczesnej Polsce [Farewell to Mother the Pole? Discourses, Practices, and Representations of Motherhood in Contemporary Poland]. Warsaw: WUW.en
dc.referencesImbierowicz, Agnieszka. 2012. “Matka Polka w defensywie? Przemiany mitu i jego wpływ na macierzyństwo polskich kobiet [The Demise of the Myth of the Polish Mother? The Myth’s Evolution and Its Impact on the Situation of Women in the Polish Society].” Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk 2:430-442.en
dc.referencesJacyno, Małgorzata. 2007. Kultura indywidualizmu [The Culture of Individualism]. Warsaw: PWN.en
dc.referencesJorge, Ana et al. 2022. “Mummy Influencers and Professional Sharenting.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 25(1):166-182.en
dc.referencesKeith, Bahareh E. and Stacey Steinberg. 2017. “Parental Sharing on the Internet. Child Privacy in the Age of Social Media and the Pediatrician’s Role.” JAMA Pediatrics 171(5):413-414.en
dc.referencesKierzkowska, Małgorzata. 2022. “Sharenting – pomiędzy prawem rodzica do wyrażania siebie w mediach społecznościowych a ochroną prywatności dziecka [Sharenting—Between a Parent’s Right to Express Themselves on Social Media and the Protection of a Child’s Privacy].” Kultura i Wychowanie 22:41-55.en
dc.referencesKozinets, Robert V., Ulrike Gretzel, and Rossella Gambetti. 2023. Influencers and Creators: Business, Culture and Practice. London: Sage.en
dc.referencesKrause, Ewa. 2020. “Współczesna kobieta w kontekście macierzyństwa i roli matki [Contemporary Woman in the Context of Motherhood and the Role of a Mother].” Wychowanie w Rodzinie 12(1):31-56.en
dc.referencesKusio, Urszula. 2004. “Współczesna kobieta wobec macierzyństwa [The Modern Woman and Motherhood].” Kultura i Edukacja 4:40-47.en
dc.referencesLatipah, Eva et al. 2020. “Elaborating Motive and Psychological Impact of Sharenting in Millennial Parents.”Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(10):4807-4817.en
dc.referencesLeszczyńska, Katarzyna and Łukasz Zych. 2011. “Wzory kobiecości w dyskursie Kościoła Rzymsko-Katolickiego w Polsce [Patterns of Femininity in the Discourse of the Roman Catholic Church in Poland].” Pp. 201-216 in Kalejdoskop genderowy: w drodze do poznania płci społeczno-kulturowej w Polsce [Gender Kaleidoscope: On the Road to Understanding Gender in Poland], edited by K. Slany, B. Kowalska, and M. Ślusarczyk. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.en
dc.referencesLevinson, Paul. 2013. New New Media. New York: Pearson Press.en
dc.referencesLou, Chen and Shupei Yuan. 2019. “Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19(1):58-73.en
dc.referencesMatthews, Dona. 2022. Imperfect Parenting: How to Build a Relationship with Your Child to Weather any Storm. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Life Tools.en
dc.referencesO’Reilly, Andrea. 2019. “Matricentric Feminism: A Feminism for Mothers.” Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement 10(1/2):13-26.en
dc.referencesPariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.en
dc.referencesPękala, Urszula. 2012. “Ewolucja roli kobiety w kościele katolickim w XX wieku – wnioski i kontrowersje [The Evolution of the Woman’s Role in the Catholic Church in the 20th Century— Conclusions and Controversies].” Aequalitas 1:1-17.en
dc.referencesRadzik, Zuzanna. 2020. Kościół kobiet [Women’s Church]. Cracow: WAM.en
dc.referencesReckwitz, Andreas. 2020. “The Society of Singularities.” Pp. 141-154 in Futures of the Study of Culture. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Global Challenges, edited by D. Bachmann-Medick, J. Kugele, and A. Nünning. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.en
dc.referencesRich, Adrienne. 1995. Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.en
dc.referencesRothman, Barbara Katz. 1989. “Recreating Motherhood.” Retrieved January 20, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265183038_Recreating_Motherhood.en
dc.referencesSchütze, Fritz. 2008a. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews—Part One.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1-2:153-242.en
dc.referencesSchütze, Fritz. 2008b. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobi ographical Narrative Interviews—Part Two.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 3-4:5-77.en
dc.referencesSennett, Richard. 2009. Upadek człowieka publicznego [The Fall of Public Man]. Warsaw: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza.en
dc.referencesSikorska, Małgorzata, ed. 2012. Raport: Ciemna strona macierzyństwa: o niepokojach współczesnych matek [Report: The Dark Side of Motherhood: On the Anxieties of Modern Mothers]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo AXA.en
dc.referencesSmithson, Janet and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2005. “Discourses of Work-Life Balance: Negotiating ‘Genderblind’ Terms in Organizations.” Gender, Work & Organization 12:147-168.en
dc.referencesSzerszunowicz, Joanna. 2013. “Lakunarność jednostki Matka Polka a jej dwujęzyczny opis słownikowy [Lacunarity of the Unit Matka Polka and Its Bilingual Lexicographic Description].” Prace Językoznawcze 2:69-82.en
dc.referencesSzerszunowicz, Joanna. 2023. “Madka z bąbelkami, czyli o leksykalnych nośnikach lakunarności [Madka with Bombelki. On the Lexical Carries of Lacunarity].” Białostockie Archiwum Językowe 23:237-256.en
dc.referencesSzpunar, Magdalena. 2018. “Koncepcja bańki filtrującej a hipernarcyzm nowych mediów [The Filter Bubble Concept and New Media Hyper-Narcissism].” Zeszyty Prasoznawcze 61(2):191-200.en
dc.referencesŚliwowska, Weronika. 2022. Dyskurs medialny związany z macierzyństwem po wprowadzeniu przez partię Prawo i Sprawiedliwość polityki prorodzinnej – analiza na przykładzie figury „madki” [Media Discourse Related to Motherhood after the Introduction of Pro-Family Policies by the Law and Justice Party—An Analysis on the Example of the ‘Madka’ Figure]. Bachelor thesis, University of Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved February 05, 2025 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362080317_Dyskurs_medialny_zwiazany_z_macierzynstwem_po_wprowadzeniu_przez_partie_Prawo_i_Sprawiedliwosc_polityki_prorodzinnej__analiza_na_przykladzie_figury_madki/link/62d5ba4bbf4b985322321602/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19).en
dc.referencesTaylor, Tiffany. 2011. “Re-Examining Cultural Contradictions: Mothering Ideology and the Intersections of Class, Gender, and Race.” Sociology Compass 5(10):898-907.en
dc.referencesTitkow, Anna. 2012. “Figura Matki Polki: próba demitologizacji [The Figure of Mother the Pole: An Attempt at Demythologization].” Pp. 27-48 in Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? Dyskursy, praktyki i reprezentacje macierzyństwa we współczesnej Polsce [Farewell to the Polish Mother? Discourses, Practices, and Representations of Motherhood in Contemporary Poland], edited by R. E. Hryciuk and E. Korolczuk. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo UW.en
dc.referencesTofil, Gabriela and Dominika Jagielska. 2024. “Children of Polish Parents Online: Dimensions and Sharenting Risks.” Studia z Teorii Wychowania 15(1):85-99.en
dc.referencesUrbańska, Sylwia. 2015. Matka Polka na odległość. Z doświadczeń migracyjnych robotnic 1989–2010 [Polish Mother from a Distance. From the Migration Experiences of Female Workers 1989-2010]. Torun: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.en
dc.referencesWalczewska, Sławomira. 1999. Damy, rycerze, feministki. Kobiecy dyskurs emancypacyjny w Polsce [Women, Knights, Feminists. Women’s Emancipation Discourse in Poland]. Cracow: eFKa.en
dc.referencesWallsten, Kevin. 2005. “Political Blogs: Is the Political Blogosphere an Echo Chamber?” American Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting 1-4.en
dc.referencesWaniek, Katarzyna. 2023. “Kilka uwag o dobrym życiu w biograficznym doświadczeniu i jego nadmiernej terapeutyzacji [Some Notes on the Good Life in Biographical Experience and Its Over-Therapeutization].” Studia Socjologiczne 1(248):31-58.en
dc.referencesWileczek, Anna and Piotr Raczyński. 2021. “Madka i madkizm. O stereotypizacji w ‘antymadkowych’ społecznościach internetowych [Madka (Welfare Mother) and Madkizm (Being a Welfare Mother). On Stereotyping within ‘Antymadkowych’ (Anti-Welfare Mother) Online Communities].” Prace Językoznawcze 23(1):151-167.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailkaja.kazmierska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.21.2.03
dc.relation.volume21


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/