Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBełdyga, Natalia
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-09T06:49:08Z
dc.date.available2025-06-09T06:49:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-31
dc.identifier.issn3071-7779
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/55681
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to explore the role of community resilience in response to the refugee crisis caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 by specifically studying two core dimensions of community resilience, namely agency and human values, to see if they helped to build and enhance community resilience to crisis and uncertainty. In this respect, two cases of responses to the refugee crisis made by two Polish border communities in two corners of Poland, one in the northeast, in Suwałki, in the borderland area often referred to as Suwałki Gap, and the second one in the southeast, in Biecz, known as ‘Little Kraków,’ have been analysed by conducting qualitative interviews with research participants in three interview groups of volunteers, community members, and municipality who privately or professionally provided help for Ukrainian refugees arriving to Poland. Qualitative results of the analysis reveal that deep awareness of members of both Polish border communities about who the aggressor is and who the defender is in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine was the main motivation to activate distinct values of, among others, compassion or mutuality that influenced the response to the arrival of Ukrainian citizens fleeing their invaded homeland and seeking safety and security in Poland – which was mainly a demonstration of sympathy and solidarity with Ukrainian refugees. The findings also reveal that one of the core community resilience dimensions – agency – was exercised collectively and individually, both bottom-up and top-down. Although the decisions were mostly spontaneously dictated by the needs of the heart, the decisions to act were made purposefully. In light of the current refugee crisis, of which the Italian island of Lampedusa is the centre, and with which EU countries have been attempting to cope, it is crucial to continue further research about the cases of responses to such crises, specifically the reactions of the most affected responders. The results of the empirical research on the analysed cases of responses to the refugee crisis and uncertainty caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 made by Polish border communities may contribute to the existing research and discourse on the role and impact of citizens’ and communities’ resilience potential in disaster response and preparedness.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFaces of War;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectresponse to crises and uncertaintyen
dc.subjectrefugee and humanitarian crisisen
dc.subjectcommunity resilienceen
dc.subjecthuman valuesen
dc.subjectagencyen
dc.titleCommunity Resilience Dimensions of Agency and Human Values in the Response of Polish Border Communities to the Refugee Crisis Caused by the Russian Invasion of Ukraine in 2022en
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number109-120
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKaunas University of Technologyen
dc.identifier.eissn3071-8597
dc.referencesB_INF1–3. Author’s private archive. Interviews with individuals assisting Ukrainian refugees in Biecz.en
dc.referencesS_INF1–3. Author’s private archive. Interviews with individuals assisting Ukrainian refugees in Suwałki.en
dc.referencesAttinà F. 2016. Migration Drivers, the EU External Migration Policy and Crisis Management Romanian. “Journal of European Affairs”. 16(4), 15–31.en
dc.referencesBaban F., Rygiel K. 2017. Living with Others: Fostering Radical Cosmopolitanism Through Citizenship Politics in Berlin. “Ethics & Global Politics” 10(1), 98–116.en
dc.referencesBarber N. 2007. Evolutionary Explanations for Societal Differences and Historical Change in Violent Crime and Single Parenthood. “Cross-Cultural Research” 41(2), 123–148.en
dc.referencesBellamy A. 2015. The Responsibility to Protect Turns Ten. “Ethics & International Affairs” 29(2), 161–185.en
dc.referencesBełdyga N. 2023. The Role of Community Resilience Dimensions of Agency and Resources in Community Resilience to Crises and Uncertainty in Polish Border Communities. “European Integration Studies” 17, 71–82.en
dc.referencesBoersma K., Kraiukhina A., Larruina R., Lehota Z., Nury E.O. 2018. A Port in a Storm: Spontaneous Volunteering and Grassroots Movements in Amsterdam. A Resilient Approach to The (European) Refugee Crisis. “Social Policy & Administration” 53(4), 728–742.en
dc.referencesBoin A., Comfort L.K., Demchak C. 2010. The Rise of Resilience. In: Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. (eds), L.K. Comfort, A. Boin, C. Demchak. Pittsburgh, 1–12.en
dc.referencesBousiou A. 2024. Solidarity and Contestation: Local Refugee Reception Practices At the South-Eastern EU Border Islands. “Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies” 22(1) 84–97.en
dc.referencesBoyd R., Richardson P.J. 2005. How Microevolutionary Processes Give Rise to History. In: The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. (eds), R. Boyd, P.J. Richardson. New York, 287–309.en
dc.referencesDunbar R., Knight C., Power C. 1999. An Evolutionary Approach to Human Culture. In: The Evolution of Culture. (eds), R. Dunbar, C. Knight, C. Power. New Brunswick, 1–14.en
dc.referencesFeischmidt M., Zakarias I. 2019. Politics of Care and Compassion: Civic Help for Refugees and Its Political Implications in Hungary – A Mixed-Methods Approach. In: Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe. (eds), M. Feischmidt, L. Pries, C. Cantat. Cham, 59–99.en
dc.referencesFolke C., Carpenter S.R., Walker B., Scheffer M., Chapin T., Rockström J. 2010. Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. “Ecology and Society” 15(4). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/art20/. Available on-line: September 29, 2023.en
dc.referencesFotaki M. 2022. Solidarity in crisis? Community Responses to Refugees and Forced Migrants In The Greek Islands. “Organization” 29(2), 295–323.en
dc.referencesGlorius B., Oesch L., Nienaber B., Doomernik J. 2019. Refugee Reception within a Common European Asylum System: Looking at Convergences and Divergences Through a Local-to-Local Comparison. “Erdkunde” 73(1), 19–29.en
dc.referencesGoroya E., Dhala K., Hayes L. 2015. Volunteers Help Refugees Survive While Europe’s Leaders Still Search For Solutions. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2015/09/volunteers-help-refugees-survive-while-europes-leaders-still-search-for-solutions/solutions/. Available on-line: September 29, 2023.en
dc.referencesHall P.A., Lamont M. 2012. Introduction. In: Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. (eds), P.A. Hall, M. Lamont. Cambridge, 1–32.en
dc.referencesKallius A., Monterescu D., Rajaram P.K. 2016. Immobilizing mobility: Border Ethnography, Illiberal Democracy, and the Politics of the „Refugee Crisis” in Hungary. “American Ethnologist” 43(1), 25–37.en
dc.referencesKarnitschnig, M. 2022. The Most Dangerous Place on Earth. “Politico”. https://www.politico.eu/article/suwalki-gap-russia-war-nato-lithuania-poland-border/border/. Available on-line: September 30, 2023.en
dc.referencesKilburn H.W. 2009. Personal Values and Public Opinion. “Social Science Quarterly” 90(4), 868–885.en
dc.referencesÖgtem-Young, Ö. 2018. Faith Resilience: Everyday Experiences. “Societies” 8(10), 1–13.en
dc.referencesPanebianco S. 2016. The Mare Nostrum Operation and the SAR Approach: The Italian Response to Address the Mediterranean Migration Crisis. “EUMedEA Online Working Paper Series” 3, 1–31.en
dc.referencesPanebianco S., Fontana I. 2018. When Responsibility to Protect 'Hits Home': the Refugee Crisis and the EU Uesponse. “Third World Quarterly” 39(1), 1–17.en
dc.referencesRast M.C., Ghorashi H. 2018. Dancing with 'the Other': Challenges and Opportunities of Deepening Democracy through Participatory Spaces for Refugees. „Social Inclusion” 6(1), 188–198.en
dc.referencesRast M.C., Younes Y., Smets P., Ghorashi H. 2019. The Resilience Potential of Different Refugee Reception Approaches Taken during the 'Refugee Crisis' in Amsterdam. “Current Sociology” 68(7), 1–19.en
dc.referencesRohan M.J. 2000. A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct. “Personality and Social Psychology Review” 4(3), 255–277.en
dc.referencesSchwartz S.H. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology” 25, 1–65.en
dc.referencesSzabó Z.P., Vollhardt J.R., Mészáros N. 2020. Through the Lens of History: The Effects of Beliefs About Historical Victimization on Responses to Refugees. “International Journal of Intercultural Relations” 74, 94–114.en
dc.referencesvan der Veer L. 2020. Residents’ Responses To Refugee Reception: The Cracks and Continuities Between Care and Control. “Ethnic and Racial Studies” 43(16), 368–387.en
dc.referencesVerplanken B., Holland R. 2002. Motivated decision making: Effects of Activation and Self-Centrality of Values on Choices and Behavior. “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 82(3), 434–447.en
dc.referencesWelzel C., Inglehart R. 2010. Agency, Values, and Well-Being: A Human Development Model. “Social Indicators Research” 97(1), 43–63.en
dc.referencesYoukhana E., Sutter O. 2017. Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society. “Social Inclusion” 5(3), 1–6.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailnatalia.beldyga@ktu.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/3071-7779.2024.2.07


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0