Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFratantuono, Lee
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-04T17:16:25Z
dc.date.available2025-11-04T17:16:25Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-30
dc.identifier.issn1733-0319
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/56638
dc.description.abstractThe Sulpiciae Conquestio that has been transmitted as part of the Epigrammata Bobiensia is a curious work, one that is replete with intertextual allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid in particular. Close examination of the course of its argument will reveal that its author offers reflections on Virgil’s depiction of the place of war and peace in Roman history, with emphasis on the point that peace can be enervating and corrosive to the Roman polity. The Conquestio thus stands forth as a late Flavian Age commentary on the problems that may result from such seemingly successful initiatives as the implementation of the Pax Augusta. en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCollectanea Philologica;28pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectVirgilen
dc.subjectSulpiciae Conquestioen
dc.subjectEpigrammata Bobiensiaen
dc.subjectAugustusen
dc.subjectIntertexualityen
dc.subjectWergiliuszpl
dc.subjectSulpiciae Conquestiopl
dc.subjectEpigrammata Bobiensiapl
dc.subjectAugustpl
dc.subjectintertekstualnośćpl
dc.titleVirgilian Reception in the “Sulpiciae Conquestio”en
dc.title.alternativeVirgilian Reception in the „Sulpiciae Conquestio”pl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number121-137
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationNational University of Ireland-Maynoothen
dc.identifier.eissn2353-0901
dc.referencesAstin, A. (1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesBaehrens, E. (1879). Poetae Latini Minores. Vol. V. Leipzig: Teubner.en
dc.referencesBaldry, H. (1952). Who Invented the Golden Age?. The Classical Quarterly 2. 83–92.en
dc.referencesBallaira, G. (1975). A proposito della Sulpiciae Conquestio (Epigr. Bob. 37). Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 103. 399–402.en
dc.referencesBallanti, A. (1954). Documenti sull’opposizione degli intellettuali a Domiziano. Annali della Facoltà de Letttere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 4. 75–95.en
dc.referencesBoas, H. (1938). Aeneas’ Arrival in Latium. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers.en
dc.referencesButrica, J. (2000). Sulpicia’s Complaint: on the State of the Nation and the Age of Domitian, Introduction (n.p.), curculio.org/Sulpiciae.en
dc.referencesButrica, J. (2006). The Fabella of Sulpicia (Epigrammata Bobiensia 37). Phoenix 60. 70–121.en
dc.referencesCampbell, G. (2003). Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book Five, Lines 772-1104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesCharles, M., Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2010). The Sexual Hypocrisy of Domitian (Suet., Dom. 8,3). L’Antiquité Classique 79. 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3406/antiq.2010.3772en
dc.referencesConway, R. (1935). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesCooley, A. (2016). Italy during the High Empire, from the Flavians to Diocletian. In: A. Cooley, (ed.). A Companion to Roman Italy. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 121–132.en
dc.referencesDewald, C., Munson, R. (2022). Herodotus: Histories Book 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesEpigrammata Bobiensia (1963). W. Speyer (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.en
dc.referencesFerguson, J. (1975). Utopias of the Classical World. London: Thames & Hudson.en
dc.referencesFratantuono, L. (n.d.). Why Does Virgil’s Victorious Venus Vanish?. Hermathena. Forthcoming.en
dc.referencesFratantuono, L. (2010). Nivales Socii: Caesar, Mamurra, and the Snow of Catullus c. 57. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 96. 101–110.en
dc.referencesGalimberti, A. (2016). The Emperor Domitian. In: A. Zissos (ed.). A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. 92–108.en
dc.referencesGarani, M. (2022). Keep Up the Good Work: (Don’t) Do It like Ovid (Sen. QNat. 3.27-30). In: K. Volk, G.D. Willliams (eds.). Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 145–163.en
dc.referencesGardner, H. (2023). Elegiac Revaluations of the Golden Age: Saturn’s Exile in Vergil and Tibullus. In: A. Keith, M.Y. Myers (eds.). Vergil and Elegy. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press. 63–81.en
dc.referencesGrainger, G. (2004). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96–99. London–New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesGreen, C. (2007). Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesHockings, T. (2021). A Reward for Your Toil: Textual Notes on ‘Sulpicia’ (Epigr. Bob. 37). Mnemosyne 74. 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-bja10103en
dc.referencesHoratius (2008). Opera. D. Shackleton Bailey (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesHorsfall, N. (2013). Virgil, Aeneid . A Commentary. Vol. 2: Commentary and Appendices. Berlin–Boston: Walter de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesJędrzejczak, D. (2009). Sulpicia as a Woman-Singer. Latomus 68. 693–695.en
dc.referencesJones, B. (1993). The Emperor Domitian. London–New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesJones, B. (2011). Suetonius: Domitian. London: Bristol Classical Press.en
dc.referencesKerrigan, C. (2020). Virgil’s Map: Geography, Empire, and the Georgics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.en
dc.referencesKuijper, D. (1965). Tertius Cato – Trabe Prolapsus. Mnemosyne 18. 155–180.en
dc.referencesLevick, B. (1982). Domitian and the Provinces. Latomus 41. 50–73.en
dc.referencesLittlewood, R. (2006). A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti, Book 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesLuke, T. (2014). Ushering in a New Republic: Theologies of Arrival at Rome in the First Century B.C.E. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.en
dc.referencesLyne, R. (1987). Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesMacara Francis, C. (2007). Martial Epigrammata, Book X: A Commentary. Doctoral Thesis, Otago.en
dc.referencesMerriam, C. (1991). The Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 84. 303–305.en
dc.referencesOakley, S. (1998). A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesParker, H. (1992). Other Remarks on the Other Sulpicia. The Classical World 86. 89–95.en
dc.referencesPerkell, C. (2002). The Golden Age and Its Contradictions in the Poetry of Vergil. Vergilius 48. 3–39.en
dc.referencesPontiggia, L. (2021). The Return of Jupiter: Aeneid 1, Punica 1, and Silius’ Post-Lucanian Theology. In: R. Marks, M. Mogetta (eds.). Domitian’s Rome and the Augustan Legacy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 158–170.en
dc.referencesRichlin, A. (1992). Sulpicia the Satirist. The Classical World 86. 125–140.en
dc.referencesRossi, A. (2004). Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.en
dc.referencesSherwin-White, A. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: a Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesStraub, C. (2019). Revisiting the Acorn-Eater: The Case of the Arkadians in Greek Antiquity. In: M. McWilliams (2020). Seeds: Proceedings of the Oxford Symposium on Food and Cookery 2018. London: Prospect Books.en
dc.referencesThiele, G. (1916). Die Poesie unter Domitian. Hermes 51. 223–260.en
dc.referencesTraina, A. (2017). Virgilio: l’utopia e la storia: Il libro XII dell’Eneide e antologia dell’opere. Bologna: Pátron Editore.en
dc.referencesVergilius (2019). Opera. G. Conte (ed.). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesWallace-Hadrill, A. (1982). The Golden Age and Sin in Augustan Ideology. Past & Present 95. 19–36.en
dc.referencesZetzel, J. (1989). Romane Memento: Justice and Judgment in Aeneid 6. Transactions of the American Philological Association 119. 263–284.en
dc.contributor.authorEmaillee.fratantuono@mu.ie
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-0319.28.09


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0