Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlfi-Nissan, Sari R.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-13T11:16:54Z
dc.date.available2025-11-13T11:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/56688
dc.description.abstractEducational spaces are both material and human sites. While people design and build the physical space of educational institutions, these spaces also shape human behavior, interaction, and thought, playing a crucial role in the articulation of discourse. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in educational research tends to rely primarily on document and text analysis, often overlooking the spatial dimensions of discourse and how social actors interpret the spaces they inhabit. This article presents the use of semiotic codes analysis of educational spaces as a methodological tool for studying discourse in institutions where ethnographic access is limited. Drawing on a qualitative study conducted in twelve Israeli state schools, this article examines how global discourses of entrepreneurialism and aspiration, which promote an ideal of a future-oriented and self-managing individual, are expressed and interpreted in everyday school settings. Through observations, walking interviews, and semiotic analysis, the study demonstrates how spatial articulations, wall texts, and visual displays work together with educators’ interpretations to shape and sometimes contest dominant ideals. The analysis merges critical spatial semiotics with a pragmatic approach to everyday meaning-making, offering a methodologically innovative and reflexive approach to discourse analysis in education.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;4en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectSociological Researchen
dc.subjectDiscourse Analysisen
dc.subjectEducationen
dc.subjectSpaceen
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen
dc.titleIs There a Sociologist in the Room? Raising the Sociological Voice in Educational Spacesen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number26-47
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Oxford, UKen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAlfi-Nissan, Sari R. 2024. “The Discourse of Self-Fulfillment in the iGeneration Era: Ideology and Practice in Israeli Education.” Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.en
dc.referencesAlfi-Nissan, Sari R. and Michal Pagis. 2023. “Glitches in the Aspirational Discourse: Between Enterprise and Compromise.” Sociological Forum 38(3):708-729.en
dc.referencesAlfi-Nissan, Sari R., Shlomo Guzmen-Carmeli, and Rachel Werczberger. 2025. “‘The Light Within Me’: Celebrating the Self through Jewish Holidays in Israeli State Education.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 40(2):239-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2025.2520059.en
dc.referencesAndrzejewski, Carey E. and Hannah Carson Baggett. 2020. “Magic and Hocus Pocus: Teaching for Social Justice in a Qualitative Methods Course.” The Qualitative Report 25(3):864-875.en
dc.referencesBall, Stephen J. 2012. Foucault, Power, and Education. New York, London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesBillig, Michael. 2003. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Rhetoric of Critique.” Pp. 35-46 in Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, edited by G. Weiss and R. Wodak. London: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesBjörkvall, Anders, Sara Van Meerbergen, and Gustav Westberg. 2023. “Feeling Safe while Being Surveilled: The Spatial Semiotics of Affect at International Airports.” Social Semiotics 33(1):209-231.en
dc.referencesBrunila, Kristiina and Päivi Siivonen. 2023. “Preoccupied with the Self: Towards Self-Responsible, Enterprising, Flexible and Self-Centred Subjectivity.” Pp. 174-187 in Neoliberalism and Education, edited by B. M. A. Jones and S. Ball. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesCayubit, Ryan Francis O. 2022. “Why Learning Environment Matters? An Analysis on How the Learning Environment Influences the Academic Motivation, Learning Strategies and Engagement of College Students.” Learning Environments Research 25(2):581-599.en
dc.referencesCharteris, Jennifer. 2022. “Post-Panoptic Accountability: Making Data Visible through ‘Data Walls’ for Schooling Improvement.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 43(3):333-348.en
dc.referencesCoburn, Cynthia E. 2004. “Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the Relationship between the Institutional Environment and the Classroom.” Sociology of Education 77(3):211-244.en
dc.referencesCrampton, Jeremy W. and Stuart Elden, eds. 2007. Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.en
dc.referencesCurtis, Rowland. 2014. “Foucault Beyond Fairclough: From Transcendental to Immanent Critique in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 35(12):1753-1772.en
dc.referencesde Certeau, Michel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.en
dc.referencesde Saint-Georges, Ingrid. 2004. “Materiality in Discourse: The Influence of Space and Layout in Making Meaning.” Pp. 71-87 in Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, edited by P. LeVine and R. Scollon. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.en
dc.referencesDovey, Kim. 2009. Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesEcclestone, Kathryn and Kristiina Brunila. 2015. “Governing Emotionally Vulnerable Subjects and ‘Therapisation’ of Social Justice.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 23(4):485-506.en
dc.referencesEricsson, Stina. 2023. “Equality, Marginalisation, and Hegemonic Negotiation: Embodied Understandings of the Built and Designed Environment.” Multimodality and Society 3(4):313-335.en
dc.referencesFairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish. Paris: Gallimard.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-77. New York: Pantheon.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 1996 [1971]. “The Discourse on Language.” Pp. 339-360 in The Continental Philosophy Reader, edited by R. Kearney and M. Rainwater. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. 2013 [1972]. Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesFrye, Margaret. 2012. “Bright Futures in Malawi’s New Dawn: Educational Aspirations as Assertions of Identity.” American Journal of Sociology 117(6):1565-1624.en
dc.referencesFuller, Martin G. and Martina Löw. 2017. “Introduction: An Invitation to Spatial Sociology.” Current Sociology 65(4):469-491.en
dc.referencesGane, Nicholas. 2012. “The Governmentalities of Neoliberalism: Panopticism, Post-Panopticism and Beyond.” The Sociological Review 60(4):611-634.en
dc.referencesGewirtz, Sharon and Alan Cribb. 2006. “What to Do about Values in Social Research: The Case for Ethical Reflexivity in the Sociology of Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 27(2):141-155.en
dc.referencesGoffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.en
dc.referencesGolder, Ben. 2020. Foucault and the Politics of Rights. Stanford: Stanford University Press.en
dc.referencesGraham, Linda J. 2011. “The Product of Text and ‘Other’ Statements: Discourse Analysis and the Critical Use of Foucault.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(6):663-674.en
dc.referencesGriswold, Wendy, Gemma Mangione, and Terence E. McDonnell. 2013. “Objects, Words, and Bodies in Space: Bringing Materiality into Cultural Analysis.” Qualitative Sociology 36:343-364.en
dc.referencesGuhin, Jeffrey. 2021. “Why Study Schools?” Pp. 381-397 in Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory, edited by S. Abrutyn and O. Lizardo. Cham: Springer.en
dc.referencesHaapanen, Lauri and Ville J. E. Manninen. 2023. “Etic and Emic Data Production Methods in the Study of Journalistic Work Practices: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journalism 24(2):418-435.en
dc.referencesHacking, Ian. 2004. “Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between Discourse in the Abstract and Face-to-Face Interaction.” Economy and Society 33(3):277-302.en
dc.referencesHallett, Tim. 2010. “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.” American Sociological Review 75(1):52-74.en
dc.referencesHardy, Cynthia and Robyn Thomas. 2015. “Discourse in a Material World.” Journal of Management Studies 52(5):680-696.en
dc.referencesHeberle, Viviane Maria, Felipe Antônio de Souza, and Luiza Horbach Dodl. 2020. “The Happiest Place on Earth: A Spatial Discourse Analysis of Disney’s Epcot World Showcase.” Revista Linguagem em Foco 12(3):405-426.en
dc.referencesJones, Phil et al. 2008. “Exploring Space and Place with Walking Interviews.” Journal of Research Practice 4(2):D2.en
dc.referencesKeller, Reiner. 2022. “The Symbolic Construction of Spaces: Perspectives from a Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse.” Pp. 36-56 in Communicative Constructions and the Refiguration of Spaces, edited by G. B. Christmann, H. Knoblauch, and M. Löw. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesKellock, Anne and Julia Sexton. 2018. “Whose Space Is It Anyway? Learning about Space to Make Space to :earn.” Children’s Geographies 16(2):115-127.en
dc.referencesLamont, Michèle. 2019. “From ‘Having’ to ‘Being’: Self-Worth and the Current Crisis of American Society.” The British Journal of Sociology 70(3):660-707.en
dc.referencesLawes, Rachel. 2019. “Big Semiotics: Beyond Signs and Symbols.” International Journal of Market Research 61(3):252-265.en
dc.referencesLeiringer, Roine and Paula Cardellino. 2011. “Schools for the Twenty-First Century: School Design and Educational Transformation.” British Educational Research Journal 37(6):915-934.en
dc.referencesMcCullough, Keiko M. and Jessica Nina Lester. 2023. “Beyond Talk and Text: Visuality and Critical Discursive Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 20(1):74-99.en
dc.referencesMills, Sara. 2003. Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesMizrachi, Nissim. 2022. “Transcending the Liberal Grammar of Critical Sociology: The Theoretical Turn in Israeli Sociology.” The American Sociologist 53(4):492-511.en
dc.referencesMizrachi, Nissim. 2024. Beyond Suspicion: The Moral Clash between Rootedness and Progressive Liberalism. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.en
dc.referencesMorrin, Kirsty. 2017. “The ‘Space’ between Reproduction and Resistance in and ‘Entrepreneurial Academy.’” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.en
dc.referencesMorrin, Kirsty. 2022. “The ‘Contradictory Space’ of the Entrepreneurial Academy: Critical Ethnography, Entrepreneurship Education and Inequalities.” Pp. 176-199 in Inside the English Education Lab: Critical Qualitative and Ethnographic Perspectives on the Academies Experiment, edited by C. Kulz, K. Morrin, and R. McGinity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.en
dc.referencesNicholls, David A. 2008. “Putting Foucault to Work: An Approach to the Practical Application of Foucault’s Methodological Imperatives.” Aporia 1(1):1-11.en
dc.referencesPinson, Halleli and Ayman K. Agbaria. 2021. “Ethno-Nationalism in Citizenship Education in Israel: An Analysis of the Official Civics Textbook.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 42(5-6):733-751.en
dc.referencesPreminger, Jonathan. 2020. “Meritocracy in the Service of Ethnocracy.” Citizenship Studies 24(2):247-263.en
dc.referencesRavelli, Louise J. and Robert J. McMurtrie. 2015. Multimodality in the Built Environment: Spatial Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesRinaldo, Rachel and Jeffrey Guhin. 2022. “How and Why Interviews Work: Ethnographic Interviews and Meso-Level Public Culture.” Sociological Methods & Research 51(1):34-67.en
dc.referencesRogers, Rebecca et al. 2005. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Education: A Review of the Literature.” Review of Educational Research 75(3):365-416.en
dc.referencesRose, Nikolas. 1998. Inventing Our Selves. Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesSam, Cecile H. 2019. “Shaping Discourse through Social Media: Using Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to Explore the Narratives that Influence Educational Policy.” American Behavioral Scientist 63(3):333-350.en
dc.referencesSasson, Irit et al. 2022. “Designing New Learning Environments: An Innovative Pedagogical Perspective.” The Curriculum Journal 33(1):61-81.en
dc.referencesSavage, Glenn. 2017. “Neoliberalism, Education and Curriculum.” Pp. 143-165 in Powers of Curriculum: Sociological Perspectives on Education, edited by B. Gobby and R. Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesSayfulloevna, Salimova Shahlo. 2023. “Safe Learning Environment and Personal Development of Students.” International Journal of Formal Education 2(3):7-12.en
dc.referencesSegal, Aliza and Galia Plotkin Amrami. 2024. “Therapeutic Discourse in Teacher Professional Discourse: On Multidimensionality and Elasticity of Psychology-Based Reasoning.” Research Papers in Education 39:206-228.en
dc.referencesSenor, Dan and Saul Singer. 2011. Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle. New York, Boston: Random House Digital.en
dc.referencesSpohrer, Konstanze, Garth Stahl, and Tamsin Bowers-Brown. 2018. “Constituting Neoliberal Subjects? ‘Aspiration’ as Technology of Government in UK Policy Discourse.” Journal of Education Policy 33(3):327-342.en
dc.referencesŠtremfel, Urška. 2021. “European Neoliberal Discourse and Slovenian Educational Space.” Pp. 206-222 in The Impacts of Neoliberal Discourse and Language in Education, edited by M. Sardoč. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesSwidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesThompson, Lucy, Bridgette Rickett, and Katy Day. 2018. “Feminist Relational Discourse Analysis: Putting the Personal in the Political in Feminist Research.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 15(1):93-115.en
dc.referencesZilberstein, Shira, Michèle Lamont, and Mari Sanchez. 2023. “Recreating a plausible Future: Combining Cultural Repertoires in Unsettled Times.” Sociological Science 10:348-373.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailSari.alfi-nissan@area.ox.ac.uk
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.21.4.02
dc.relation.volume21


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0