Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKubala, Konrad
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-27T07:18:14Z
dc.date.available2026-05-27T07:18:14Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/58383
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a secondary analysis of research findings on the responses of state institutions and civil society to the September 2024 flood in southern Poland. The study selectively examines results from individual and group interviews regarding flood preparedness, the mobilization of social actors during the crisis, and organizational transformations necessary to enhance state resilience. The primary research objective is to analyze the interfaces between governmental, local, and civil society institutions, conceptualized herein as “crush zones.” The original contribution of this paper lies in operationalizing these zones to evaluate how inter-institutional friction impacts societal resilience. Furthermore, the conclusions of the source report are subjected to a critical evaluation within the context of the existing literature on resilience, with attention to its potential to mask institutional power asymmetries.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesQualitative Sociology Review;2en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectCrush Zonesen
dc.subjectSocial Resilienceen
dc.subjectCrisis Managementen
dc.subjectLocal Governmenten
dc.subjectNon-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)en
dc.subjectRelational Capitalen
dc.subjectCrisis Communicationen
dc.titleState and Civil Society Response to the 2024 Floods in Southern Poland: A Critical Reviewen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number80-97
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódźen
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8077
dc.referencesAldrich, Daniel P. 2012. Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesArcher, Margaret Scotford. 2003. Structure, Agency, and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesBerkes, Fikret and Helen Ross. 2013. “Community Resilience: Toward an Integrated Approach.” Society & Natural Resources 26(1):5-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.736605.en
dc.referencesBhamra, Ran, Samir Dani, and Kevin Burnard. 2011. “Resilience: The Concept, a Literature Review and Future Directions.” International Journal of Production Research 49(18):5375-5393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563826.en
dc.referencesEnsor, Jonathan, John Forrester, and Nilufar Matin. 2018. “Bringing Rights into Resilience: Revealing Complexities of Climate Risks and Social Conflict.” Disasters 42(S2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12304.en
dc.referencesEnsor, Jonathan E. et al. “Opening Space for Equity and Justice in Resilience: A Subjective Approach to Household Resilience Assessment.” Global Environmental Change 68:102251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102251.en
dc.referencesKapucu, Naim, Christopher V. Hawkins, and Fernando I. Rivera, eds. 2013. Disaster Resiliency. New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesKeck, Markus and Patrick Sakdapolrak. 2013. “What Is Social Resilience? Lessons Learned and Ways Forward.” Erdkunde 67(1):5-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02.en
dc.referencesKotras, Marcin, Konrad Kubala, and Dawid Sześciło, eds. 2025. Kiedy pękają tamy: o państwie, wspólnocie i zarządzaniu kryzysem [When Dams Break. On the State, Community, and Crisis Management]. Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.en
dc.referencesKyne, Dean and Daniel P. Aldrich. 2020. “Capturing Bonding, Bridging, and Linking Social Capital Through Publicly Available Data.” Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 11(1):61-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12183.en
dc.referencesMatin, Nilufar, John Forrester, and Jonathan Ensor. 2018. “What Is Equitable Resilience?” World Development 109:197-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020.en
dc.referencesMayer, Brian. 2019. “A Review of the Literature on Community Resilience and Disaster Recovery.” Current Environmental Health Reports 6(3):167-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00239-3.en
dc.referencesMesjasz, Joanna. 2024. “Kluczowe aspekty kształtowania społeczności rezylientnych [The Key Aspects of Creating Resilient Communities].” Pp. 72-109 in Współczesne wyzwania zarządzania samorządem lokalnym: analiza wieloaspektowa [Contemporary Challenges of Managing the Local Government: Multi-Aspect Analysis], edited by M. Czopek and J. Walczak. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe FNCE; Uczelnia Jana Wyżykowskiego.en
dc.referencesOnyx, Jenny and Paul Bullen. 2000. “Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36(1):23-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886300361002.en
dc.referencesSaja, A. M. Aslam et al. 2021. “A Critical Review of Social Resilience Properties and Pathways in Disaster Management.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 12(6):790-804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00378-y.en
dc.referencesThomalla, Frank et al. 2018. “Transforming Development and Disaster Risk.” Sustainability 10(5):1458. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051458.en
dc.referencesTiernan, Anne et al. 2019. “A Review of Themes in Disaster Resilience Literature and International Practice Since 2012.” Policy Design and Practice 2(1):53-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240.en
dc.referencesWelsh, Marc. 2014. “Resilience and Responsibility: Governing Uncertainty in a Complex World.” The Geographical Journal 180(1):15-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailkonrad.kubala@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8077.22.2.04
dc.relation.volume22


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0