Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrawiec, Wioletta
dc.contributor.authorSibińska, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGrzegorczyk, Wojciech
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T13:42:23Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T13:42:23Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-11
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/58793
dc.description.abstractThe study is founded on the concept of shared value creation defined by Porter and Kramer as policies and operational practices that enhance business competitiveness while simultaneously improving socio-economic conditions. The research adopts the perspective that shared value operates as a strategic process and is composed of three interconnected and inseparable dimensions: social value creation, environmental value creation, and economic value creation. Understanding the interdependencies among these dimensions is considered crucial for developing this strategic process.The article examines the interdependencies between the dimensions of shared value and their influence on the strategic process within the organisation.The study utilised a theoretical framework positioning shared value as a strategic process where interdependencies exist between all dimensions. The primary analytical tool employed was fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), which is suitable for integrating qualitative and quantitative methodologies and reflecting existing interdependencies. Empirical data were collected via a cross-sectional electronic survey from the agri-food sector in Poland, specifically involving 22 grain and cereals producers.The analysis does not reveal a single path to creating shared value. Social value is influenced by environmental factors such as reduced environmental impact, resource consumption and extended product life. Similarly, environmental value is influenced by social factors such as community safety, improved employment conditions and employee skills development. Both dimensions are integral to the creation of economic value. The results provide empirical evidence for the interdependence of shared value dimensions, affirming that shared value creation can be conceptualised as a strategic process directly influenced by the interplay between its social, environmental, and economic components. Managers are advised to utilise combinations of different conditions to create value and gain competitive advantage.en
dc.description.abstractBadanie opiera się na koncepcji tworzenia wspólnej wartości (shared value), zdefiniowanej przez Portera i Kramera jako polityki i praktyki operacyjne, które zwiększają konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstw, jednocześnie poprawiając warunki społeczno-ekonomiczne. W badaniu przyjęto perspektywę, zgodnie z którą wspólna wartość funkcjonuje jako proces strategiczny składający się z trzech wzajemnie powiązanych i nierozłącznych wymiarów: tworzenia wartości społecznej, środowiskowej i ekonomicznej. Zrozumienie współzależności między tymi wymiarami uznaje się za kluczowe dla rozwoju tego procesu strategicznego.Celem artykułu jest zbadanie współzależności między wymiarami wspólnej wartości oraz ich wpływu na proces strategiczny w organizacji.W badaniu zastosowano ramy teoretyczne, w których wspólna wartość jest postrzegana jako proces strategiczny, w obrębie którego występują współzależności między wszystkimi wymiarami. Narzędziem analitycznym zastosowanym w badaniu była metoda analizy jakościowej zbiorów rozmytych (fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis – fsQCA), umożliwiająca integrację metod jakościowych i ilościowych oraz odzwierciedlenie istniejących współzależności. Dane empiryczne zebrano w formie elektronicznej ankiety przekrojowej w sektorze rolno-spożywczym w Polsce, obejmującej 22 producentów i dystrybutorów produktów zbożowych.Analiza nie wykazała istnienia jednej ścieżki prowadzącej do tworzenia wspólnej wartości. Wartość społeczna jest kształtowana przez czynniki środowiskowe, takie jak ograniczenie wpływu na środowisko, zużycia zasobów czy wydłużenie cyklu życia produktu. Z kolei wartość środowiskowa zależy od czynników społecznych, takich jak bezpieczeństwo społeczności, poprawa warunków zatrudnienia i rozwój umiejętności pracowników. Oba te wymiary są integralnymi elementami tworzenia wartości ekonomicznej. Wyniki dostarczają empirycznych dowodów na współzależność wymiarów wspólnej wartości, potwierdzając, że proces jej tworzenia można postrzegać jako proces strategiczny bezpośrednio kształtowany przez interakcje pomiędzy komponentami społecznymi, środowiskowymi i ekonomicznymi. Menedżerowie powinni wykorzystywać kombinacje różnych warunków w celu tworzenia wartości i uzyskania przewagi konkurencyjnej.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;375en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectshared valueen
dc.subjectfuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysisen
dc.subjectagri-food industryen
dc.subjectwspólna wartośćpl
dc.subjectanaliza jakościowa zbiorów rozmytych (fsQCA)pl
dc.subjectprzemysł rolno-spożywczypl
dc.titleUncovering Interdependence of Shared Value Dimensions – Insights from the Agri-Food Industryen
dc.title.alternativeOdkrywanie współzależności wymiarów wspólnej wartości – wnioski z branży rolno-spożywczejpl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number52-77
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKrawiec, Wioletta - University of Lodz, Management Faculty, Marketing Department, Lodz, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSibińska, Anna - University of Lodz, Management Faculty, Marketing Department, Lodz, Polanden
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationGrzegorczyk, Wojciech - University of Lodz, Management Faculty, Marketing Department, Lodz, Polanden
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesAhmad M., Wilkins S. (2025), Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey, ‟Quality and Quantity”, vol. 59, pp. 1461–1479, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5en
dc.referencesAlberti F.G., Varon Garrido M.A. (2017), Can profit and sustainability goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms, “Journal of Business Strategy”, vol. 38(1), pp. 3–13, https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2015-0124en
dc.referencesBacq S., Eddleston K.A. (2016), A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact, “Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 152(3), pp. 589–611, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1en
dc.referencesBansal P. (2005), Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development, “Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 26(3), pp. 197–218, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441en
dc.referencesBarile S., Saviano M. (2013), Dynamic Capabilities and T-Shaped Knowledge: A Viable Systems Approach, [in:] S. Barile (ed.), Contributions to Theoretical and Practical Advances in Management. A Viable Systems Approach, Roma: ARACNE Editrice, pp. 39–59.en
dc.referencesBitencourt da Silva S., Bitencourt C.C. (2018), Towards a Social-Resource-Based View (SRBV), “Mega Journal of Business Research”, vol. 1, pp. 1–15.en
dc.referencesBloom P.N., Smith B.R. (2010), Identifying the Drivers of Social Entrepreneurial Impact: theoretical Development and an Exploratory Empirical Test of SCALERS, “Journal of Social Entrepreneurship”, vol. 1(1), pp. 126–145, https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903458042en
dc.referencesBonini S., Emerson J. (2005), Maximizing Blended Value – Building Beyond the Blended Value Map to Sustainable Investing. Philanthropy and Organizations, https://1library.net/document/zk1k70eq-maximizing-blended-building-blended-sustainable-investing-philanthropy-organizations.html [accessed: 15.02.2025].en
dc.referencesCamilleri M.A., Troise C., Strazzullo S., Bresciani S. (2023), Creating shared value through open innovation approaches: Opportunities and challenges for corporate sustainability, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, vol. 32(7), pp. 4485–4502.en
dc.referencesCarroll A.B. (1999), Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, “Business and Society”, vol. 38(3), pp. 268–295, https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303en
dc.referencesCarter C.R., Rogers D.S. (2008), A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory, “International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management”, vol. 38(5), pp. 360–387.en
dc.referencesChaurasia S.S., Kaul N., Yadav B., Shukla D. (2020), Open innovation for sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system, openness and organizational structure, “Journal of Knowledge Management”, vol. 24(10), pp. 2491–2511, https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0319en
dc.referencesDe Silva M., Wright, M. (2019), Entrepreneurial co-creation: societal impact through open innovation, “R&D Management”, vol. 49(3), pp. 318–342, https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12362en
dc.referencesDembek K., Singh P., Bhakoo V. (2016), Literature Review of Shared Value: A Theoretical Concept or a Management Buzzword?, “Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 137(2), pp. 231–267, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2554-zen
dc.referencesDi Domenico M., Haugh H., Tracey P. (2010), Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice”, vol. 34(4), pp. 681–703, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.xen
dc.referencesDiamond A., Tropp D., Barham J., Muldoon M.F., Kiraly S., Cantrell P. (2014), Food Value Chains: Creating Shared Value to Enhance Marketing Success, U.S. Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, pp. 1–72, https://doi.org/10.9752/MS141.05-2014en
dc.referencesEmerson J. (2003), The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns, “California Management Review”, vol. 45(4), pp. 35–51, https://doi.org/10.2307/41166187en
dc.referencesEzzi F., Jarboui A. (2016), Does innovation strategy affect financial, social and environmental performance?, “Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science”, vol. 21(40), pp. 14–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jefas.2016.03.001en
dc.referencesFlorin J., Schmidt E. (2011), Creating shared value in the hybrid venture arena: A Business model innovation perspective, “Journal of Social Entrepreneurship”, vol. 2(2), pp. 165–197.en
dc.referencesFritz M., Schiefer G. (2008), Food chain management for sustainable food system development: a European research agenda, “Agribusiness”, vol. 24(4), pp. 440–452, https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20172en
dc.referencesGionfriddo G., Piccaluga A.M.C. (2023), Creating shared value through open innovation: Insights from the case of Enel industrial plants, “Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility”, vol. 34(1), pp. 137–154, https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12611en
dc.referencesGreen K., Morton B., New S. (1998), Green purchasing and supply policies: do they improve companies’ environmental performance?, “Supply Chain Management”, vol. 3(2), pp. 89–95, https://doi.org/10.1108/13598549810215405en
dc.referencesHamam M., Spina D., Raimondo M., Di Vita G., Zanchini R., Chinnici G., Toth J., D’Amico M. (2023), Industrial symbiosis and agri-food system: Themes, links, and relationships, “Frontiers in Sustainable Food System”, vol. 6, 1012436, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1012436en
dc.referencesHart S.L., Milstein M.B. (2003), Creating sustainable value, “Academy of Management Perspectives”, vol. 17(2), pp. 56–67, https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2003.10025194en
dc.referencesHumbert S., Loerincik Y., Rossi V., Margni M., Jolliet O. (2009), Life cycle assessment of spray dried soluble coffee and comparison with alternatives (drip filter and capsule espresso), “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 17(15), pp. 1351–1358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.011en
dc.referencesJones C.I. (2022), The End of Economic Growth? Unintended Consequences of a Declining Population, “American Economic Review”, vol. 112(11), pp. 3489–3527, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201605en
dc.referencesKhurshid H., Snell R.S. (2021), Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 129, pp. 122–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.030en
dc.referencesKim D., Thoma G., Nutter D., Milani F., Ulrich R., Norris G. (2013), Life cycle assessment of cheese and whey production in the USA, “The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment”, vol. 18, pp. 1019–1035, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0553-9en
dc.referencesKoller T., Nuttall R., Henisz W. (2019), Five ways that ESG creates value, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/five-ways-that-esg-creates-value [accessed: 15.02.2025].en
dc.referencesKroeger A., Weber C. (2014), Developing a Conceptual Framework for comparing Social Value Creation, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 39(4), pp. 513–540, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0344en
dc.referencesLavie D., Stettner U., Tushman M.L. (2010), Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations, “The Academy of Management Annals”, vol. 4(1), pp. 109–155, https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287en
dc.referencesLi W., Zhu W., Wang B. (2023), The impact of creating shared value strategy on corporate sustainable development: From resources perspective, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management”, vol. 30(5), pp. 2081–2693, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2490en
dc.referencesLu Q., Chesbrough H. (2022), Measuring open innovation practices through topic modelling: Revisiting their impact on firm financial performance, “Technovation”, vol. 114, 102434.en
dc.referencesMaletič M., Maletič D., Gomiscek B. (2018), The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 171, pp. 423–433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.172en
dc.referencesMcGahan A.M., Bogers M.L.A.M., Chesbrough H., Holgersson M. (2021), Tackling Societal Challenges with Open Innovation, “California Management Review”, vol. 63(2), pp. 49–61, https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620973713en
dc.referencesMenghwar P.S., Daood A. (2021), Creating shared value: A systematic review, synthesis and integrative perspective, “International Journal of Management Reviews”, vol. 23(4), pp. 466–485, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12252en
dc.referencesMenguc B., Ozanne L.K. (2005), Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 58, pp. 430–438, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.002en
dc.referencesMurphy P.J., Coombes S.M. (2008), A Model of Social Entrepreneurial Discovery, “Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 87(3), pp. 325–336, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9921-yen
dc.referencesNam S.J., Hwang H. (2019), What makes consumers respond to creating shared value strategy? Considering consumers as stakeholders in sustainable development, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management”, vol. 26(2), pp. 388–395, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1690en
dc.referencesNickl M. (2019), Value Creation Stages in Environmental Sustainability, https://sphera.com/resources/blog/the-4-phases-of-value-creation-in-environmental-sustainability/ [accessed: 15.02.2025].en
dc.referencesNilsen E.R., Gausdal A.H. (2017), The multifaceted role of the network orchestrator – A longitudinal case study, “International Journal of Innovation Management”, vol, 21(6), 1750046, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500463en
dc.referencesOrdanini A., Maglio P.P. (2009), Market Orientation, Internal Process, and External Network: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Key Decisional Alternatives in the New Service Development, “Decision Science”, vol. 40(3), pp. 601–625, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00238.xen
dc.referencesPańczyszyn A. (2024), ISO 14001. Zarządzanie środowiskowe jako element strategii firmy, https://kompasesg.pl/esg/zarzadzanie/iso-14001-zarzadzanie-srodowiskowe-jako-element-strategii-firmy/ [accessed: 20.03.2024]en
dc.referencesPappas I.O., Woodside A.G. (2021), Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing, “International Journal of Information Management”, vol. 58, 102310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310en
dc.referencesPaulraj A. (2011), Understanding the Relationships between Internal Resources and Capabilities, Sustainable Supply Management and Organizational Sustainability, “Journal of Supply Chain Management”, vol. 47(1), pp. 19–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03212.xen
dc.referencesPorter M.E. (2011), Creating Shared Value: Redefining Capitalism and the Role of the Corporation in Society, https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/2011-0609_FSG_Creating_Shared_Value_20859152-c051-44dd-a2c0-761abf6bc2d1.pdf [accessed: 20.11.2025]en
dc.referencesPorter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2002), The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 80(12), pp. 56–68.en
dc.referencesPorter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2006), Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 84(12), pp. 78–92.en
dc.referencesPorter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2011), Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – And unleash a wave of innovation and growth, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 89(1–2), pp. 62–77.en
dc.referencesPorter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2014), A response to Andrew Crane et al.’s article by Michael E. Porter and Mark R. Kramer, “California Management Review”, vol. 56(2), pp. 149–151.en
dc.referencesPorter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2019), Creating shared value, Springer, Dordrecht.en
dc.referencesPrahalad C.K., Ramaswamy V. (2004), Co-creation experiences: The nest practice in value creation, “Journal of Interactive Marketing”, vol. 18(3), pp. 5–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015en
dc.referencesPriyono A., Shukor S., Moin A., Salikin, N. (2024), How does a firm leverage dynamic capabilities to pioneer a business ecosystem and serve as the orchestrator? Lessons learned from a coffee shop industry, https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/scbg8en
dc.referencesRagin C.C. (2008), User’s Guide to Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson.en
dc.referencesRagin C.C., Davey S. (2006), Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tuscon.en
dc.referencesRagin C.C., Drass K., Davey S. (2014), Fs/QCA [Computer Program], version 2.5, University of California, Irvine.en
dc.referencesRosca R., Arnold M., Bendul J.C. (2017), Business models for sustainable innovation – an empirical analysis of frugal products and services, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 162(20), pp. 133–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.050en
dc.referencesRubio-Andrés M., Mar Ramos-González M. del, Sastre-Castillo M.Á. (2022), Driving innovation management to create shared value and sustainable growth, “Review of Managerial Science”, vol. 16(7), pp. 2181–221, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00520-0en
dc.referencesSibińska A., Krawiec W. (2023), Creating shared Value (CSV) Measurement Tool: Conceptualizing the construct and its dimensions, “Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series”, no. 174, pp. 255–274, http://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.174.18en
dc.referencesSingh S.K., Gupta S., Busso D., Kamboj S. (2021), Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 128, pp. 788–798, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040en
dc.referencesSinthupundaja J., Kohda Y., Chiadamrong N. (2020), Examining Capabilities of Social Entrepreneurship for Shared Value Creation, “Journal of Social Entrepreneurship”, vol. 11(1), pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1543726en
dc.referencesSpithoven A., Vanhaverbeke W., Roijakkers N. (2013), Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises, “Small Business Economics”, vol. 41, pp. 537–562, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9en
dc.referencesStrand R., Freeman R.E. (2015), Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia, “Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 127(1), pp. 65–85, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24702786 [accessed: 4.03.2025]en
dc.referencesWillett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., Garnett T., Tilman D., DeClerck F., Wood A., Jonell M., Clark M., Gordon L.G., Fanzo J., Hawkes C., Zurayk R., Rivera J.A., De Vries W., Majele Sibanda L., Afshin A., Chaudhary A., Herrero M., Agustina R., Branca F., Lartey A., Fan S., Crona B., Fox E., Bignet V., Troell M., Lindahl T., Singh S., Cornell S.E., Reddy K.S., Narain S., Nishtar S., Murray C.J.L. (2019), Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, “Lancet”, vol. 396(10170), pp. 447–492, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4en
dc.referencesWitjes S., Lozano R. (2016), Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models, “Resources, Conservation and Recycling”, vol. 112, pp. 37–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015en
dc.referencesZhu Q.H., Sarkis J. (2004), Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, “Journal of Operations Management”, vol. 22(3), pp. 265–289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005en
dc.contributor.authorEmailKrawiec, Wioletta - wioletta.krawiec@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailSibińska, Anna - anna.sibinska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailGrzegorczyk, Wojciech - wojciech.grzegorczyk@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.375.03
dc.relation.volume2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0