Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMasierek, Edyta
dc.contributor.authorBorowska-Stefańska, Marta
dc.contributor.authorSikora-Fernandez, Dorota
dc.contributor.authorŚlebocka, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-10T10:27:26Z
dc.date.available2026-07-10T10:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-30
dc.identifier.issn1231-1952
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/58866
dc.description.abstractThe article analyses one of the tools for public participation in urban regeneration processes in Poland, specifically the Revitalisation Committee. The study evaluates the practical implementation of this tool based on an analysis of 20 municipalities in the Łódzkie Voivodeship. The results indicate that this tool is often used in a largely symbolic or superficial manner, with considerable arbitrariness in the selection of committee members and limited influence on actual revitalisation activities at the municipal level. They can be a valuable basis for further research in this field. The conclusions may be useful for municipalities implementing revitalisation, where community involvement is considered crucial.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Spatial Research and Policy;1en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjecturban regenerationen
dc.subjectRevitalisation Committeeen
dc.subjectpublic participationen
dc.titleRevitalisation committee as a participation tool in urban regeneration processes in Poland: Case study of the Lodzkie Voivodeshipen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number137-162
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMasierek, Edyta - University of Lodz, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Institute of the Built Environment and Spatial Policyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBorowska-Stefańska, Marta - University of Lodz, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Institute of the Built Environment and Spatial Policyen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSikora-Fernandez, Dorota - University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of City and Regional Managementen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationŚlebocka, Magdalena - University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Institute of Finance, Department of Central Banking and Financial Intermediationen
dc.identifier.eissn1896-1525
dc.referencesARBAB, P., TAGHIZADEH, K. and FADAEI NEZHAD, S. (2020), ‘Toward participation-based urban planning and development: evaluating participatory revitalization in middle Oudlajan neighborhood of Tehran’, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146 (4), 05020022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000611en
dc.referencesARIAS VALENCIA, M. M. (2022), ‘Principles, Scope, and Limitations of the Methodological Triangulation’, The Journal Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 40 (2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e03en
dc.referencesARNSTEIN, S. R. (1969), ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American planning association Institute of planners, 35 (4), pp. 216−224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388en
dc.referencesBARTOLETTI, R. and FACCIOLI, F. (2020), ‘Civic Collaboration and Urban Commons. Citizen’s Voices on a Public Engagement Experience in an Italian City’, Partecipazione e conflitto, 13 (2), pp. 1132−1152. https://dx.doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i2p1132en
dc.referencesBOBBIO, L. (2019), ‘Designing effective public participation’, Policy and Society, 38 (1), pp. 41−57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193en
dc.referencesCAMERIN, F. (2021), ‘Regenerating Former Military Sites in Italy. The Dichotomy between «Profit-Driven Spaces» and «Urban Commons»’, Global Jurist, 21 (3), pp. 497−523. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2021-0075en
dc.referencesCAMERIN, F. (2023), ‘Urban Governance in Post-pandemic Barcelona: A Superblock-Based New Normal?’, [in:] LISSANDRELLO, E., SØRENSEN, J., OLESEN, K. and STEFFANSEN, R. N. (eds), The ‘New Normal’ in Planning, Governance and Participation. The Urban Book Series, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32664-6_22en
dc.referencesCAMERIN, F. (2024), ‘Former military barracks as places for informal placemaking in Italy. An inventory for new insights’, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 17 (2), pp. 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2024.2327588en
dc.referencesCAMERIN, F. and LONGATO, D. (2024), ‘Designing healthier cities to improve quality of life: An analysis of challenges and outcomes in two Spanish cases’, Journal of Urban Design, 30 (1), pp. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2024.2351925en
dc.referencesCHAHARDOWLI, M. and SAJADZADEH, H. (2022), ‘A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City’, Land Use Policy, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105993en
dc.referencesCHAN, Y. E., KRISHNAMURTHY, R., MANN, J. and SABHERWAL, R. (2022), ‘Public Participation in Policy Making: Evidence from a Citizen Advisory Panel’, Public Performance & Management Review, 45 (6), pp. 1308–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2062398en
dc.referencesCIESIÓŁKA, P. (2018), ‘Urban Regeneration as a New Trend in the Development Policy in Poland’, Quaestiones Geographicae, 37 (2), pp. 109–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0015en
dc.referencesCIESIÓŁKA, P., KUDŁAK, R. and KOSŁUT, B. (2016), ‘Programowanie rewitalizacji w miastach województwa wielkopolskiego w latach 1999–2015’, Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 36, pp. 57–71.en
dc.referencesCÓRDOBA HERNÁNDEZ, R. and CAMERIN, F. (2023), ‘Assessment of ecological capacity for urban planning and improving resilience in the European framework: An approach based on the Spanish case’, Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 49 (2), pp. 119−142, https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/cig/article/view/5638 [accessed on: 5.04.2025].en
dc.referencesCREIGHTON, J. L. (2005), The Public Participation Handbook. Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.en
dc.referencesDŁUGOSZ, D. and WYGNAŃSKI, J. J. (2005), Obywatele współdecydują. Przewodnik po partycypacji społecznej, Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie na rzecz Forum Inicjatyw Pozarządowych.en
dc.referencesDŹWIGOŁ, H. and DŹWIGOŁ-BAROSZ, M. (2020), ‘Research process and methodological triangulation, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology’, Organization and Management Series, 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.12en
dc.referencesDZIARMAKOWSKA, N. (2023), ‘Rola komitetów rewitalizacji w procesie rewitalizacji na przykładzie województwa wielkopolskiego’, Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 66, pp. 129−148. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2023.66.09en
dc.referencesFORS, H., HAGEMANN, F., SANG, A. and RANDRUP, T. (2021), ‘Striving for Inclusion—A Systematic Review of Long-Term Participation in Strategic Management of Urban Green Spaces’, Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, 572423. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.572423en
dc.referencesGRABOWSKA, M. and FRANKOWSKI, J. (2016), ‘Close to the city centre, close to the university’. Are there symptoms of studentification in Gdańsk, Poland?’, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 32, pp. 73–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2016-0016en
dc.referencesHAJDUK, S. (2021), Partycypacja społeczna w zarządzaniu przestrzennym w kontekście planistycznym, Białystok: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej.en
dc.referencesHAJDYS, D. and ŚLEBOCKA, M. (2021), Rewitalizacja miast we współpracy z podmiotem prywatnym w formule partnerstwa publiczno-prywatnego, Kraków-Legionowo: edu-Libri.en
dc.referencesHOŁUJ, D. and LEGUTKO-KOBUS, P. (2018), ‘A participatory model of creating revitalisation programmes in Poland–challenges and barriers’, Mazowsze Studia Regionalne, 26, pp. 33−59. https://doi.org/10.21858/msr.26.02en
dc.referencesHUNZIKER, M., BUCHECKER, M. and HARTIG, T. (2007), ‘Space and Place - Two Aspects of the Human-landscape Relationship’, [in]: KIENAST, F., WILDI, O. and GOSH, S. (eds), A Changing World - Challenges for Landscape Research, pp. 47–62, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4436-6en
dc.referencesHUK, M. Z. (2024), Teoria demokracji deliberatywnej Jane Mansbridge, doctoral thesis, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poznań, https://bip.amu.edu.pl/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/583061/Huk-Marta-Z._rozprawa-doktorska.pdf [accessed on: 10.04.2025].en
dc.referencesIGE-ELEGBEDE, J., PILKINGTON, P., ORME, J., WILLIAMS, B., PRESTWOOD, E., BLACK, D. and CARMICHAEL, L. (2020), ‘Designing healthier neighborhoods: a systematic review of the impact of the neighborhood design on health and well-being’, Cities & Health, 6 (5), pp. 1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1799173en
dc.referencesJARCZEWSKI, W. and KURYŁO, M. (2010), ‘Rewitalizacja w liczbach’, [in:] ZIOBROWSKI, Z. and JARCZEWSKI, W. (eds), Rewitalizacja miast polskich – diagnoza, Rewitalizacja miast polskich, tom 8, Instytut Rozwoju Miast, Kraków, pp. 253–266.en
dc.referencesKACZMAREK, P. (2021), ‘Przegląd działalności wybranych komitetów rewitalizacji w województwie wielkopolskim’, Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, (53), pp. 65−76. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2021.53.05en
dc.referencesKREUSSLEIN, M. and GÜNTER, M. (2024), ‘Power to the citizens: Factors fostering satisfaction with citizen participation in urban planning’, [in:] MACIEJKO, A. (ed.), Human Factors in Architecture, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure, AHFE (2024) International Conference. AHFE Open Access, 153, AHFE International, USA. http://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005342en
dc.referencesLEGUTKO-KOBUS, P. and NOWAK, M. J. (2020), ‘Niesprawność władz publicznych w świetle prawno-przestrzennych i partycypacyjnych narzędzi rewitalizacji’, Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 3 (27), pp. 117−135.en
dc.referencesThe List of Positively Verified Municipal Revitalisation Programs, maintained by the Managing Authority of the regional operational program European Funds for Lodz 2021–2027, https://funduszeue.lodzkie.pl/rewitalizacja/wykaz-gpr [accessed on: 20.02.2025].en
dc.referencesMASIEREK, E. (2021), ‘Urban regeneration programming in Poland in the years 2014-2020’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 28 (1), pp. 225−247. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.28.1.12en
dc.referencesMASIEREK, E. and PAZDER, D. (2024), ‘Partycypacja w rewitalizacji–przykład ulicy św. Marcin w Poznaniu’, Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, (72), pp. 111−129. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2024.72.07en
dc.referencesMANSBRIDGE, J. (1983). Beyond Adversary Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesMcCLENDON, B. W. (1993), ‘The paradigm of empowerment’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59 (2), pp. 145−147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975861en
dc.referencesMIŚKOWIEC, M. and MASIEREK, E. (2023). ‘Factors and levels of community participation using the example of small-scale regeneration interventions in selected neighbourhood spaces in Polish cities.’ Urban Research and Practice, 16, pp. 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2099758en
dc.referencesNAVAS-CARRILLO, P. and RODRIGUEZ-LORA, J. (2024), ‘Perspectivas innovadoras sobre el patrimonio urbano. Hacia la regeneración integral de los barrios de vivienda colectiva’, European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-647en
dc.referencesORDINANCE No. 9204/VIII/21 of the Mayor of Lodz, dated 30 December 2021, ZARZĄDZENIE Nr 9204/VIII/2021 PREZYDENTA MIASTA ŁODZI z dnia 30 grudnia 2021 r. w sprawie powołania Komitetu Rewitalizacji.en
dc.referencesNOWORÓL, A., NOWORÓL, K. and HAŁAT, P. (2012), ‘Partycypacja społeczna w zarządzaniu procesami rewitalizacji’, Problemy Rozwoju Miast, 1, pp. 26−39.en
dc.referencesPASIKOWSKI, S. (2015), ‘The Triangulation. From Geodesy to Attempt at Overcoming of Conceptual Limitations in Social Research Methodology’, Transdyscyplinarne Studia o Kulturze (i) Edukacji, 10, pp. 224−246.en
dc.referencesPENDLEBURY, J. and PORFYRIOU, H. (2017), ‘Heritage, urban regeneration and place-making’, Journal of Urban Design, 22 (4), pp. 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1326712en
dc.referencesPRZYWOJSKA, J. (2019), ‘Współzarządzanie i partycypacja społeczna w rewitalizacji’, Rocznik Lubuski, 45 (2), pp. 21−34. https://doi.org/10.34768/rl.2019.v452.02en
dc.referencesThe Revitalisation Act, Ustawa o rewitalizacji z dnia 9 października 2015 r. o rewitalizacji (J. of L. of 2015 Item1777) as amended (J. of L. of 2024 Item 278).en
dc.referencesROBERTS, P. (2016), ‘The evolution, definition, and purpose of urban regeneration’, [in]: ROBERTS, P., SYKES, H. and GRANGER, R. (eds), Urban regeneration, pp. 9–43, London.en
dc.referencesSAGAN, I. and GRABKOWSKA, M. (2012), ‘Urban Regeneration in Gdańsk, Poland: Local Regimes and Tensions Between Top-Down Strategies and Endogenous Renewal’, European Planning Studies, 20 (7), pp. 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.674347en
dc.referencesSCHROETER, R., SCHEEL, O., RENN, O. and SCHWEIZER, P.-J. (2016), ‘Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation’, Energy Research & Social Science, 13, (March 2016), pp. 116−125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.01en
dc.referencesSIEMIŃSKI, W. (2007), ‘Cele i zasady partycypacji społecznej w planowaniu przestrzennym - przegląd literatury’, Człowiek i Środowisko, 31 (1−2), pp. 37−59.en
dc.referencesSMITH, N. (2006), The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London – New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesVIVEK, R., NANTHAGOPAN, Y. and PIRIYATHARSHAN, S. (2023), ‘Beyond methodology: Theoretical foundations of triangulation in qualitative and multi-method research: A literature review’, Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 29 (2), pp. 53−62. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/2.2023.53en
dc.referencesWOOLRYCH, R. and SIXSMITH, J. (2013), ‘Placing well‐being and participation within processes of urban regeneration’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26 (3), pp. 216−231. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2011-0119en
dc.referencesWÓJCICKI, M. (2013), ‘Pojęcie, istota i formy partycypacji społecznej w procesie planowania przestrzennego’, Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 24, pp. 170–183.en
dc.referencesYADAV, B. (2024), ‘Citizen Participation in Government Decision-Making’, Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 9 (4), pp. 267–271. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n04.033en
dc.contributor.authorEmailMasierek, Edyta - edyta.masierek@geo.uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailBorowska-Stefańska, Marta - marta.borowska@geo.uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailSikora-Fernandez, Dorota - dorota.sikora@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailŚlebocka, Magdalena - magdalena.slebocka@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1231-1952.33.1.02
dc.relation.volume33


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0