Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKaźmierczak, Damianen
dc.contributor.authorMarszałek, Jakuben
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-28T13:05:34Z
dc.date.available2015-04-28T13:05:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-10en
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/8403
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to characterize and show the differences between issuers of ordinary convertibles and convertibles with attached put/call provisions (put/call convertibles). The research was carried out on a sample of 379 firms in the US market, outside the financial sector, between 2002 and 2011. It turns out that the issuers of put/call convertibles are the companies with a higher risk exposure, associated with, inter alia, a higher level of indebtedness and worse ratio between the issue value to the fixed assets value. Adding the put/call provisions is aimed at decreasing issuers’ risk exposure, which may increase the market demand for this type of convertible securitiesen
dc.description.abstractCelem artykułu jest scharakteryzowanie i wykazanie różnic między emitentami zwykłych obligacji zamiennych i obligacji zamiennych z dołączoną opcją put/call. Badanie zostało przeprowadzone na podstawie 379 emitentów tych instrumentów na rynku amerykańskim w latach 2002-2011 spoza sektora finansowego. Okazuje się, że decyzje o emisji put/call convertibles podejmują spółki obarczone wyższym ryzykiem inwestycyjnym, o czym świadczy m.in. wyższy poziom zadłużenia czy gorsza relacja wartości emisji to wartości aktywów trwałych. Dołączenie opcji call/put do zwykłych obligacji zamiennych ma na celu obniżenie ryzyka inwestycyjnego emitenta, co może spowodować zwiększenie popytu na ten rodzaj papierów wartościowych ze strony inwestorów.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research;17en
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en
dc.subjectfinancingen
dc.subjectconvertible bondsen
dc.subjectput/call provisionsen
dc.subjectU.S. marketen
dc.subjectfinansowanieen
dc.subjectobligacje zamienneen
dc.subjectklauzule put/callen
dc.subjectrynek amerykańskien
dc.titleDeterminants of the Issuance of Put/Call Convertibles in the Non-Financial Sector of the US Marketen
dc.page.number119-137en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Faculty of Management, Department of Business Managementen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Łódź, Faculty of Management, Department of Business Managementen
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6737
dc.referencesAsquith P., Mullins D. (1990), Convertible Debt: Corporate Call Policy and Voluntary Conversion, ‘The Journal of Finance’, no. 46(4)en
dc.referencesBrennan M., Kraus A. (1987), Efficient Financing under Asymmetric Information, ‘Journal of Finance’, no. 42(5) doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04363.xen
dc.referencesBrennan M., Schwartz E. (1977), Convertible Bonds: Valuation and Optimal Strategies for Call and Conversion, ‘The Journal of Finance’, no. 32(5) doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03364.xen
dc.referencesBrennan M., Schwartz E. (1988), The Case for Convertibles, ‘Journal of Applied Corporate Finance’, no. 1(2) doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1988.tb00166.xen
dc.referencesBrigham E. (1966), An Analysis Of Convertible Debentures: Theory And Some Empirical Evidence, ‘Journal of Finance’, no. 21(1)en
dc.referencesChemmanur T., Simonyan K. (2010), What Drives the Issuance of Putable Convertibles: Risk- Shifting, Asymmetric Information, or Taxes?, ‘Financial Management’, no. 39(3) doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01103.x ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000281897800006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesConstantinides G., Grundy B. (1989), Optimal Investment with Stock Repurchase and Financing as Signals, ‘Review of Financial Studies’, no. 2(4) doi: 10.1093/rfs/2.4.445en
dc.referencesGreen R. (1984), Investment Incentives, Debt, and Warrants, ‘Journal of Financial Economics’, no. 13(1) doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90034-5en
dc.referencesGreiner D., Kalay A., Kato H. K. (2002), The Market for Callable-Convertible Bonds: Evidence from Japan, ‘Pacific-Basin Finance Journal’, no. 10en
dc.referencesHarris M., Raviv A. (1985), A Sequential Signalling Model of Convertible Debt Call Policy, ‘The Journal of Finance’, no. 40(5) doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02382.xen
dc.referencesIngersoll E. (1977), A Contingent-Claims Valuation of Convertible Securities, ‘Journal of Financial Economics’, no. 4(3) doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90004-6en
dc.referencesIngersoll E. (1977), An Examination of Corporate Call Policies on Convertible Securities, ‘Journal of Finance’, no. 32(2) doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03285.xen
dc.referencesIsagawa N. (2002), Callable Convertible Debt Under Managerial Entrenchment, ‘Journal of Corporate Finance’, no. 8 doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00041-4en
dc.referencesIsagawa N., Convertible Debt: an Effective Financial Instrument to Control Managerial Opportunism, ‘Review of Financial Economics’, no. 9(1)en
dc.referencesJaffee D., Shleifer A. (1990), Costs Of Financial Distress, Delayed Calls Of Convertible Bonds, And The Role Of Investment Banks, ‘Journal of Business, no. 63(1) doi: 10.1086/296496en
dc.referencesJalan P., Barone-Adesi G. (1995), Equity Financing and Corporate Convertible Bond Policy, ‘Journal of Banking and Finance’, no. 19(2),en
dc.referencesJensen M., Meckling W. (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, ‘Journal of Financial Economics’, no. 3(4) doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-Xen
dc.referencesKim Y. (1990), Informative Conversion Ratios: A Signalling Approach, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 25(2) doi: 10.2307/2330826en
dc.referencesLewis C., Rogalski R., Seward J. (2001) The Long-Run Performance of Firms That Issue Convertible Debt: an Empirical Analysis of Operating Characteristics and Analyst Forecasts, ‘Journal of Corporate Finance’, no. 7(4) doi: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00035-9en
dc.referencesMayers D. (2000), Convertible Bonds: Matching Financial and Real Options, ‘Journal of Applied Corporate Finance’, no. 13(1) doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00038.xen
dc.referencesModigliani F., Merton M. (1958), The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, ‘American Economic Review’, no. 48(3)en
dc.referencesMyers S., Majluf N. (1984), Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have, ‘Journal of Financial Economics’, no. 13 doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0en
dc.referencesStein J. (1992), Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing, ‘Journal of Financial Economics’, no. 32(1) Szymczak W. (2010), Podstawy statystyki dla psychologów, Difin, Warszawa doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90022-Pen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/cer-2014-0017en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.