| dc.contributor.author | Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-12T12:35:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-12T12:35:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-11-06 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1731-7533 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/9647 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In their Insensitive Semantics (2005) Cappelen and Lepore argue for the Controversial Aspect (CA) which is a part of their Speech Act Pluralism and which says that speakers don’t have privileged access to what they say. Gross (2006) criticizes C&L’s argument for CA and urges them to abandon that claim. I argue that on C&L’s broad understanding of the notion of what is said, CA (and whole SAP) is trivial, whereas on a more restricted understanding CA is indeed controversial and plausibly false. Moreover, the broad reading of what is said is incompatible with one of C&L’s tests for context-sensitivity. | en |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Research in Language;10 | en |
| dc.rights | This content is open access. | en |
| dc.title | What is Said and Indirect Speech Reports | en |
| dc.page.number | 345-352 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Warsaw | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2083-4616 | |
| dc.references | Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics. A Defense ofSemantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. | en |
| dc.references | Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. 1997. “On an Alleged Connection Between Indirect Speech and the Theory of Meaning”. Mind and Language 12, 278-296. DOI: doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1997.tb00075.x | en |
| dc.references | Cappelen, Herman and Ernie Lepore. (2006). “Response”. Mind and Language 21, 50-73. | en |
| dc.references | Gross, Steven. 2006 “Can One Sincerely Say What One Doesn’t Believe?”, Mind andLanguage 21, 11-20. DOI: doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00302.x | en |
| dc.references | Kaplan, David. 1989. “Demonstratives”. In J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes form Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Lepore, Ernie. 2004. “An Abuse of Context in Semantics: The Case of Incomplete Definite Descriptions”. In M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions andBeyond (41-67). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en |
| dc.references | Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Joanna. 2010. “Sprawozdania w mowie zależnej”, PrzeglądFilozoficzny - Nowa Seria 3, 263-276. | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2478/v10015-011-0026-9 | en |
