Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorWawrzyniak, Agnieszkaen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T12:37:42Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T12:37:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-17en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9689
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents an analysis of a number of cognitive metaphors pertaining to the concept of mind (e.g. sanity and insanity), heart, and fire. The study has been based on the text of Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer. The paper contains a short theoretical introduction and a discussion of different linguistic and psychological approaches to issues related to figurative and literal, conventional language use. The analytical part focuses on the detailed contextual study of the cognitive metaphorical concepts. It is argued that many apparently similar concepts can evoke semantically conflicting metaphors, while concepts that appear to be mutually exclusive can sometimes evoke common associations and thereby similar metaphors.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;12en
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en
dc.subjectmetaphoren
dc.subjectmetonymyen
dc.subjectassociationsen
dc.subjectculture-specificen
dc.subjectuniversalen
dc.titleCognitive Metaphors of the Mind in the Canterbury Talesen
dc.page.number49-60en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAdam Mickiewicz University Kaliszen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesBarcelona, Antonio (2000). “On the possibility of claiming a metaphoric motivation for a conceptual metaphor” In A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (31-58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesBordelajo, Barbara (ed.) (2003). Caxton’s Canterbury Tales Project: The British Library Copies. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.en
dc.referencesCruse, David Alan (2004). Meaning in language. An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000292487900016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesLakoff George & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en
dc.referencesLangacker, Ronald (1990). Concept, image and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesRadden, Gunter (2000). “How metonymic are metaphors.” In: A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the cross-roads. A cognitive perspective (92-108). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.en
dc.referencesSweetser, Eve (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesSzwedek, Aleksander (2007). “Alternative theory of metaphorisation. In M. Fabiszak (ed.), Language and meaning (313-327). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.en
dc.referencesTraugott, Elisabeth (1989). “On the rise of epistemic meaning in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change.” Language, 65, 31-55. doi: 10.2307/414841en
dc.contributor.authorEmailagnieszka78kaga@wp.plen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/rela-2014-0011en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.