Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVolín, Janen
dc.contributor.authorWeingartová, Lenkaen
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T12:38:04Z
dc.date.available2015-06-12T12:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-26en
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9699
dc.description.abstractDue to the clear interference of their mother tongue prosody, many Czech learners produce their English with a conspicuous foreign accent. The goal of the present study is to investigate the acoustic cues that differentiate stressed and unstressed syllabic nuclei and identify individual details concerning their contribution to the specific sound of Czech English. Speech production of sixteen female non-professional Czech and British speakers was analysed with the sounds segmented on a word and phone level and with both canonical and actual stress positions manually marked. Prior to analyses the strength of the foreign accent was assessed in a perception test. Subsequently, stressed and unstressed vowels were measured with respect to their duration, amplitude, fundamental frequency and spectral slope. Our results show that, in general, Czech speakers use much less acoustic marking of stress than the British subjects. The difference is most prominent in the domains of fundamental frequency and amplitude. The Czech speakers also deviate from the canonical placement of stress, shifting it frequently to the first syllable. On the other hand, they seem to approximate the needed durational difference quite successfully. These outcomes support the concept of language interference since they correspond with the existing linguistic knowledge about Czech and English word stress. The study adds specific details concerning the extent of this interference in four acoustic dimensions.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Language;12en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en
dc.subjectCzech Englishen
dc.subjectword stressen
dc.subjectdurationen
dc.subjectF0en
dc.subjectSPLen
dc.subjectspectral slopeen
dc.titleAcoustic Correlates of Word Stress as A Cue to Accent Strengthen
dc.page.number175-183en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationVolín Jan - Metropolitan University Prague, Czech Republicen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWeingartová Lenka - Institute of Phonetics, Prague, Czech Republicen
dc.identifier.eissn2083-4616
dc.referencesBeckman, M. E. 1986. Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.en
dc.referencesBoersma, P. and Weenink, D. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.41). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.en
dc.referencesCrystal, D. 1996. The past, present and future of English rhythm. In M. Vaughan-Rees (ed) Changes in Pronunciation. Whitstable: IATEFL Pronsig.en
dc.referencesCutler, A. 2005. Lexical stress. In D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez (eds) The handbook of speech perception. Oxford: Blackwell: 264-289.en
dc.referencesFry, D. B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 27: 765-768.en
dc.referencesFry, D. B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1: 126-152.en
dc.referencesHammarberg, B., Fritzell, B., Gauffin, J., Sundberg, J. and Wedin, L. 1980. Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. Acta Otolaryngologica 90: 441-451.en
dc.referencesJanota, P. and Palková, Z. 1974. Auditory evaluation of stress under the influence of context. AUC Philologica 2/1974, Phonetica Pragensia, 4: 29-59.en
dc.referencesKlatt, D. H. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59: 1208-1221.en
dc.referencesPalková, Z. and Volín, J. 2003. The role of F0 contours in determining foot boundaries in Czech. Proceedings of the 15th ICPhS 2: 1783-1786. Barcelona: UAB.en
dc.referencesSluijter, A. and van Heuven, V. 1996. Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 630-633. Philadelphia.en
dc.referencesVolín, J. 2008. Z intonace čtených zpravodajství: výška první slabiky v taktu [Intonation in newsreading: pitch of the first syllable in a stress group]. Čeština doma a ve světě 3-4: 89-96.en
dc.referencesVolín, J., Weingartová, L. and Skarnitzl, R. 2013. Spectral Characteristics of Schwa in Czech Accented English. Research in Language 11(1): 31-39. DOI: doi: 10.2478/v10015-012-0008-6en
dc.referencesWeingartová, L. and Volín, J. 2014. Short-term spectral slope measures and their sensitivity to speaker, vowel identity and prominence. Akustické listy 20(1): 5-12.en
dc.referencesWells, J. C. 2008. Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailVolín Jan - jan.volin@ff.cuni.czen
dc.contributor.authorEmailWeingartová Lenka - lenka.weingartova@ff.cuni.czen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/rela-2014-0008en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.