dc.contributor.author | Cameron, Julie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-10T09:16:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-10T09:16:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0208-6018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/19180 | |
dc.description.abstract | Questions are being raised about whether U N-EDIFACT or
XML messaging should be adopted for eCommerce. The case study
method is used to describe and directly compare experience
implementing messaging in two industry projects of a similar size,
scope and complexity: one involving the design and piloting of
UN-EDIFACT messages in the international Maritime Transport
industry over a one year period 1994-95; the second involving the
development, testing and implementation of XML messages in the
Superannuation Industry over a four year period 1998-2002. The
comparison highlights the importance and impacts of message
selection and describes the issues encountered and outcomes. The
paper concludes by listing criteria for use when determining the
appropriate messaging protocol for eCommerce initiatives. | pl_PL |
dc.description.sponsorship | Zadanie pt. „Digitalizacja i udostępnienie w Cyfrowym Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego kolekcji czasopism naukowych wydawanych przez Uniwersytet Łódzki” nr 885/P-DUN/2014 zostało dofinansowane ze środków MNiSW w ramach działalności upowszechniającej naukę | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;157 | |
dc.title | UN-EDIFACT or XML: A Critical eCommerce Decision | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [111]-123 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | T.EC Solutions Ply Ltd Sydney | pl_PL |