Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBudzowska, Malgorzata
dc.contributor.authorCzerwinska, Jadwiga
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T08:01:14Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T08:01:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1733-0319
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21033
dc.description.abstractAncient myths from the Mediterranean Culture often become a language used to express current social and political anxieties. In the contemporary theatre ancient myths are deconstructed and subverted according to the postmodern dialogue with tradition. Aesthetic changes are accompanied by the ideological modifications. This obviously crisis position of myth is associated with the method of de-contextualization when a mythical plot or just a mythical character is involved in the (post)modern political background. This paper is to analyse three theatre productions from Polish theatre (Iphigenia by Antonina Grzegorzewska, 2008; Oresteia by Michał Zadara, 2010; Antigone by Marcin Liber, 2013) which adapt the most political ancient myths of Atreides and Labdacides’ families. Authors will present the ancient literary context of these myths (Sophocles, Euripides, Aeschylus) and compare it with the contemporary stage adaptations. Political issues which will be discussed concern 1) global terrorism threat; 2) communism; 3) political usage of dead heroes and enemies – post-memory; 4) wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; 5) Nazi genocide; 6) media management of death. All these current problems constitute a deconstructed background for ancient myths and authors will consider whether this procedure creates an empty mythical mask for performance or, conversely, it enriches a source meaning of ancient myth.en_GB
dc.description.abstractLes mythes antiques de la culture méditerranéenne deviennent une langue utilisée pour exprimer les angoisses politiques actuelles. Dans le théâtre contemporain mythes sont souvent déconstruites selon au dialogue post-moderne avec la tradition. Cet article est pour analyser deux productions théâtrales du théâtre polonais (Iphigénie par Antonina Grzegorzewska, 2008; Orestie par Michał Zadara, 2010) qui adaptent le plus politique mythe antique des Atréides, dans le contexte de ses versions littéraires anciennes (Orestie d’Eschyle, Iphigénie en Aulis d’Euripide). Les questions politiques discutés comprennent menace du terrorisme mondiale, le communisme, les guerres en Irak et en Afghanistan.fr_FR
dc.description.sponsorshipArtykuł jest częścią projektu badawczego Starożytny teatr i dramat w świetle pism scholiastów finansowanego z programu OPUS Narodowego Centrum Nauki (UMO-2012/07/B/HS2/01475)en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCollectanea Philologica; 19
dc.subjectmythe antiquefr_FR
dc.subjecttragedie grécquefr_FR
dc.subjectpostmodernismefr_FR
dc.subjectthéâtrefr_FR
dc.titleThe Political Involvement of Myth in Its Stage Adaptationsen_GB
dc.title.alternativeL'Engagement politique du myth dans ses adaptations thèâtralesfr_FR
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016en_GB
dc.page.number[63]-75
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Katedra Filologii Klasycznej, Zakład Hellenistyki i Religioznawstwa, 90-236 Łódź, ul. Pomorska 171/173
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Instytut Romanistyki, Zakład Italianistyki, 90-236 Łódź, ul. Pomorska 171/173
dc.identifier.eissn2353-0901
dc.referencesBenedetto di, V. (1971). Euripide: teatro e società. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.fr_FR
dc.referencesChodkowski, R. (2004). „Wstęp’. In Sofokles, Antygona, Warszawa: Prószyński i Spółka.fr_FR
dc.referencesChodkowski, R.. (1994). Ajschylos i jego tragedie. Lublin: TN KUL.fr_FR
dc.referencesColeridge, E.P. (transl.) (1891). The Plays of Euripides. Volume II. London: George Bell and Sons.fr_FR
dc.referencesCzerwińska, J. (2011). „Co nam zostało z teatru antycznego?’ In Dylematy Dramatu i Teatru u progu XXI wieku, ed. by Anna Podstawka, Agnieszka Jarosz, 168–188. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Katol­ickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.fr_FR
dc.referencesCzerwińska, J. (2013). Innowacje mitologiczne i dramaturgiczne Eurypidesa. Tragedia. Tragikome­dia, Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ.fr_FR
dc.referencesGarvie, A.F. (1986). ‘Introduction’. In Choephori by Aeschylus, IX-X. Oxford: Oxford University Press.fr_FR
dc.referencesGavran, M. (1983). Creon’s Antigone http://www.mgavran2.t-com.hr/antigone_complete.php (accessed 09.11.2014)fr_FR
dc.referencesGuardini, M.L. (1987). ‘Introduction’. In Il mito di Elena. Testi di Euripide e Isocrate, ed. by Maria Lia Guardini. T.: Edizioni Canova Treviso.fr_FR
dc.referencesHirsch, M. (2008). ‘The Generation of Postmemory’. Poetics Today 29, 1: 103–128fr_FR
dc.referencesJebb, R. (transl.) (1891). The Antigone of Sophocles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.fr_FR
dc.referencesKitto, H.D.F. (2013). Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Routledge.fr_FR
dc.referencesLiddell H.G., and Robert Scott (eds.) (1883). Greek-English Lexicon. New York: Harper and Broth­ers.fr_FR
dc.referencesMurray, R. (transl.) (1920). The Agamemnon of Aeschylus. London: Oxford University Press.fr_FR
dc.referencesNeschke, A. (1986). ‘L’Orestie de Stesichore et la tradition littéraire du mythe des Atrides avant Eschyle’. L’antiquité classique 55: 283–301.fr_FR
dc.referencesSuzuki, T. ‘The Promise of Theatre’: http://www.scot-suzukicompany.com/en/philosophy.php (accessed 04.10.2016).fr_FR
dc.referencesWillett, J. (1978). The Theatre of Erwin Piscator: Half a Century of Politics in the Theatre. London: Methuen.fr_FR
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-0319.19.05


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord