Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFilipczak-Białkowska, Anita
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-08T15:01:01Z
dc.date.available2018-02-08T15:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1505-9057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24036
dc.description.abstract The article entitled “Strategies for organising the attention of receivers in e-mail marketing” discusses issues within social communication, more specifically e-mail advertising communication. In it, I consider the intention to draw the attention of receivers as the major element of said type of communication. The creators of advertisements utilise various methods for presenting their offers, as, in the light of market research, e-mail communication still holds a high significance in marketing. E-mail inboxes are often filled with advertising messages. Users easily identify some of those as advertising messages, and remove them without engaging their attention resources. Other, however, require more careful consideration as they do not reveal their commercial provenance, or even force users to open them. In order to discover the communication-based mechanisms which lay at the foundation of the influence on the receiver, I conducted a study of the material that I collected within a period of 2 years; there I analysed only those elements of an e-mail visible to receivers prior to clicking on a message. Eventually, I extracted 300 examples indicating the applications of the strategies discussed in the article, one of which is based on the intention to highlight an offer among other messages, while the other is aimed at concealing the marketing dimension of an offer. The assumed perspective of this communication-based study was explained by a description of an interdisciplinary nature: I discuss each strategy from the perspective of a linguist, I propose explanations of the mechanisms of their operation based on the knowledge regarding selected psychological mechanisms, and I indicated the operating tactics utilised within each strategy. The significance of the study was emphasised by the fact that a conscious and intentional concealment of the purpose of an e-mail constitutes an instrumental approach to receivers. Therefore, the application by the senders of advertising messages of the discussed strategies raises justified ethical doubts, and demands further research consideration, which might lead to legislative solutions.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica; 5; 5
dc.subjectsocial communicationen_GB
dc.subjectreceiver’s attentionen_GB
dc.subjectadvertisingen_GB
dc.subjecte-mail marketingen_GB
dc.subjectgenre homotopiaen_GB
dc.subjectfigure-ground concepten_GB
dc.titleStrategies for organising the attention of receivers in e-mail marketingen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017en_GB
dc.page.number[157]-169
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationChair of Journalism and Social Communication, Faculty of Philology, University of Lodz
dc.identifier.eissn2353-1908
dc.referencesAwdiejew A., “Sytuacja komunikacyjna w procesie ideacji”, in: “Sytuacja komunikacyjna i jej parametry. Sytuacje – komunikacja – konteksty”, G. Sawicka (ed.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego, Bydgoszcz 2010, pp. 15–23.en_GB
dc.referencesCamm S., “O mechanizmach homotypii gatunkowej”, in: “Komunikacja wizualna w przestrzeni społecznej”, A. Obrębska (ed.), Primum Verbum, Lodz 2009, pp. 111–139.en_GB
dc.referencesChing Biu Tse A., Lee R.P.W., “Zapping Behaviour during Commercial Breaks”, Journal of Advertising Research 2001, Issue 41 (3), pp. 25–29.en_GB
dc.referencesDutko M., “Copywriting internetowy”, PWN, Warsaw 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesFalkowski A., Tyszka T., “Psychologia zachowań konsumenckich”, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdansk 2009, pp. 15–45.en_GB
dc.referencesHeath R., “Seducing the Subconscious. The Psychology of Emotional Influence in Advertising”, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2012.en_GB
dc.referencesHoward D.J., Gengler Ch., Jain A., “What is in a Name? A Complimentary Means of Persuasion”, Journal of Consumer Research 1995, Issue 22 (2), pp. 200–211.en_GB
dc.referencesLoewenstein G., “The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Interpretation“, Psychological Bulletin 1994, Issue 116 (1), pp. 75–98.en_GB
dc.referencesObrębska A., “Reklama jako komunikacyjny kameleon”, in: “Dyskursy komunikacji medialnej”, A. Filipczak-Białkowska (ed.), Primum Verbum, Lodz 2011, pp. 82–92.en_GB
dc.referencesRadicati S., Levenstein J., “Email Statistics Report, 2013–2017”, http://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Email-Statistics-Report-2013-2017-Executive-Summary.pdf [accessed on: 15.12.2016].en_GB
dc.referencesSengupta J., Goodstein R.C., Boninger D.S., “All Cues Are Not Created Equal: Obtaining Attitude Persistence under Low-involvement Conditions”, Journal Of Consumer Research 1997, Issue 23, pp. 351–352.en_GB
dc.referencesShinn-Cunningham B.G., “Object based auditory and visual attention”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, Issue 12, pp. 182–186.en_GB
dc.referencesWilkie W.L., “Consumer Behaviour”, Willey, New York 1994.en_GB
dc.referencesWrycza-Bekier J., “Webwriting”, Helion, Gliwice 2010.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailanitafilipczak@wp.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1505-9057.43.11
dc.relation.volume43en_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record