Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBarańska-Szmitko, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-08T15:01:01Z
dc.date.available2018-02-08T15:01:01Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1505-9057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24038
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the text was to indicate the image characteristics of an author of a verbal expression which were communicated through expressing generalising judgements, and to establish the difference between such generalisations depending on the given image characteristic. I used constructivism as the leading theory. In terms of methodology, I applied mixed methods: quantitative (quasi-experiment) and discourse analysis. The analysis indicated that generalisations are used for communicating the characteristics of: intelligent, critical, bluntly states her/his bold judgements, insightful, writes in an interesting way, realist, frank, while the receivers assign some of the characteristics depending on the degree of evaluation emphasis, reference to a taboo, utilisation of negation, and expressions using the 1st person plural.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was co-financed within the framework of a limited subsidy for research, and the development of young scientists and Ph.D. candidates, project code: B1711300001711.02.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica; 5; 5
dc.subjectcompetencesen_GB
dc.subjectcolumnisten_GB
dc.subjectcolumnen_GB
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisen_GB
dc.subjectimageen_GB
dc.titleThe application of generalising judgements and their influence on the images of selected Polish columnists (a constructivism-focussed quantitative and qualitative approach)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017en_GB
dc.page.number[185]-198
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationChair of Communication Theory and Practice, Department of Journalism and Social Communication, University of Lodz
dc.identifier.eissn2353-1908
dc.referencesAwdiejew A., Habrajska G., “Obrazy ideacyjne w interpretacji tekstu”, in: “Rozmowy o komunikacji 5. Kategorialne aspekty komunikacji”, G. Habrajska (ed.), Primum Verbum, Lodz 2011, pp. 57–66.en_GB
dc.referencesBabbie E., “The Practice of Social Research”, 9th. ed., Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA 2001.en_GB
dc.referencesBarańska-Szmitko A., “Image from Words. What do Authors of Columns Communicate about Themselves to their Readers?”, Humanities Social Sciences Review 2014, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 67–74.en_GB
dc.referencesBarańska-Szmitko A., “Means of Communicating an Image of Being ‘Engaged’ and ‘A Realist’ in Newspaper Columns: Results of Empirical Research”, Humanities and Social Sciences Review 2016, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 127–136.en_GB
dc.referencesBarańska-Szmitko A., “The Capacities and Limitations of the Newspaper Column as a Tool for Creating the Image of Its Author”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 2016, No. 5 (35), pp. 115–129.en_GB
dc.referencesBarańska-Szmitko A., “The Capacities and Limitations of the Newspaper Column as a Tool for Creating the Image of Its Author”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica, 2016, No. 5 (35), p. 115–129.en_GB
dc.referencesCorbett E.P.J., Connors R.J., “Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student”, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York 1998.en_GB
dc.referencesCreswell J.W., “Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches”, 4th ed., Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington D.C. 2014.en_GB
dc.referencesDąbrowska A., “Zmiany obszarów podlegających tabu we współczesnej kulturze”, in: “Język a Kultura. Tom Jubileuszowy. Tom 20”, A. Dąbrowska (ed.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wroclaw 2008, pp. 173–196.en_GB
dc.referencesFleischer M., “Obszar tabu w systemie polskiej kultury”, in: “Literatura, kultura, komunikacja. Księga Pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Jerzego Jastrzębskiego w 60. rocznicę urodzin”, M. Graszewicz, K. Stasiuk (eds.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wroclaw 2006, pp. 283–300.en_GB
dc.referencesFleischer M., “Konstrukcja rzeczywistości 2”, Wydawnictwo Atut, Wroclaw 2008.en_GB
dc.referencesFleischer M., “Ogólna teoria komunikacji”, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wroclaw 2008.en_GB
dc.referencesFleischer M., “Typologia komunikacji”, Primum Verbum, Lodz 2012.en_GB
dc.referencesFlick U., “Designing Qualitative Research”, Sage, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington D.C. 2007.en_GB
dc.referencesGoffman E., “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life”, Anchor Books, New York 1959.en_GB
dc.referencesHovland L.C., Weiss C.W., “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness”, Public Opinion Quarterly 1951, Issue 15, pp. 635–650.en_GB
dc.referencesLeary M., “Self-presentation: Impression Management And Interpersonal Behavior”, Westview Press, Boulder 1996.en_GB
dc.referencesMalhotra N., Hall J., Shaw M., Oppenheim P., “Marketing Research: An applied orientation”, 3rd ed., Pearson Education Australia Pry Ltd., New South Wales, Australia 2005.en_GB
dc.referencesMiodunka W., “Teoria pól językowych. Społeczne i indywidualne ich uwarunkowania”, PWN, Warsaw 1982.en_GB
dc.referencesPisarek W., “Eksperyment – metoda nie tylko fonetyczna”, Biuletyn PTJ 1969, Vol. 28, pp. 181–188.en_GB
dc.referencesWhite H.A., Andsager J.L., “Newspaper Column Readers’ Gender Bias: Perceived Interest and Credibility”, Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 68, Issue 4, 1991, pp. 709–718.en_GB
dc.referencesWilson A., Johns R., Miller K.W., Pentecost R., “Marketing research: an integrated approach: solving business problems. The value of marketing research”, Pearson Education Australia Pry Ltd., New South Wales, Australia 2010.en_GB
dc.referencesHołownia S., “Hotelowa Biblia”, Wprost 2013, Issue 9, p. 39.en_GB
dc.referencesHołownia S., “Nie zarazić się złem”, Rzeczpospolita 2013, Issue 23, p. 2.en_GB
dc.referencesHołownia S., “O. Rydzyk jest naszym lustrem”, Newsweek 2012, Issue 20, p. 31.en_GB
dc.referencesHołownia S., “To nie piekarnia”, Wprost 2013, Issue 11, p. 69.en_GB
dc.referencesŚroda M., “Kościół błądzi”, Wprost, 2013, Issue 16, p. 45.en_GB
dc.referencesŚroda M., “O Polkę niepodległą!”, Wprost 2013, Issue 11, p. 53.en_GB
dc.referencesŚroda M., “Ofensywa rynsztoka pod skrzydłami PiS”, Wprost 2013, Issue 22, p. 42.en_GB
dc.referencesŚroda M., “Rzecz o myśleniu”, Wprost 2012, Issue 19, p. 44.en_GB
dc.referencesŚroda M., “Świat na opak wywrócony!”, Wprost 2013, Issue 20, p. 19.en_GB
dc.referencesVarga K., “Klątwa Klossa, czyli ofiary adoracji”, Duży Format 2012, Issue 75, p. 23.en_GB
dc.referencesVarga K., “Ocieranie się, czyli sztuka słuszna i niska”, Duży Format 2013, Issue 219, p. 3.en_GB
dc.referencesVarga K., “Trzech kumpli czyli upiorna Mitteleuropa”, Duży Format 2012, Issue 124, p. 24.en_GB
dc.referencesZaremba P., “Hrabia Fredro krzepi”, Sieci 2013, Issue 18, p. 51.en_GB
dc.referencesZaremba P., “Serialowy powrót kanibala”, Sieci 2013, Issue 16–17, p. 77.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailanna.baranska@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1505-9057.43.13
dc.relation.volume43en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord