Pokaż uproszczony rekord

The deontological perspective of sustainable development

dc.contributor.authorPłachciak, Adam
dc.contributor.authorMukarutesi, Dative
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T11:09:45Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T11:09:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-30
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/35180
dc.description.abstractThe idea of sustainable development as a normative concept emphasizes the necessity for a wider consensus on meeting human needs, ensuring social equity, and respecting planetary boundaries. The purpose of the article focuses on the deontological orientation in perceiving sustainable development. It is expected that looking at sustainability from the deontological perspective might increase individuals’ awareness of responsibility towards respecting the needs of the world’s poor, environmental boundaries, and moral equity, which emphasizes that all people are equal. Any attempt to achieve sustainability demands, first of all, rational action placed on moral duties/obligations before individual people or institutions can achieve their particular desires and goals. According to this perspective, sustainability should be treated as a prior constraint in obtaining economic maximization.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym;1pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten
dc.subjectethicsen
dc.subjectdeontologen
dc.subjecthuman needsen
dc.subjectPlanetary boundariesen
dc.subjectequityen
dc.titleThe deontological perspective of sustainable developmenten
dc.title.alternativeRozwój zrównoważony w perspektywie deontologicznejpl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number83-96
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPłachciak, Adam - Wrocław University of Economics, Faculty of Economy, Management and Tourism in Jelenia Góraen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMukarutesi, Dative - The National University of Rwanda, Department of Accountingen
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4869
dc.referencesBuchanan, J. M. (1987). Justice and Charity. Ethics, 87(3), 558–575.en
dc.referencesCrocker, D. A., & Robeyns, I. (2010). Capability and Agency. In Ch. Morris, Amartya Sen. Contemporary Philosophy Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesCrutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.en
dc.referencesDoyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesDworkin, R. (1981). What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283–345.en
dc.referencesEcosystems and Human Well-Being – Synthesis. A Report of the Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Washington (DC): Island Press.en
dc.referencesGough, I. (2015). Climate Change and sustainable welfare. The Centrality of Human Needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1191–1214.en
dc.referencesHallsmith, G. (2003). The Key to Sustainable Cities. Meeting Human Needs. Transforming Community Systems. Gambriola: New Society Publishers.en
dc.referencesHart, H. L. A. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights. Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175–191.en
dc.referencesHuman Environment. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. (1982). New York–Geneva: United Nations.en
dc.referencesJones, H. (2009). Equity in Development. Why It is Important and How to Achieve It. London: Overseas Development Institute.en
dc.referencesKant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesKlosko, G. (1994). Political Obligation and the Natural Duties of Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23(3), 251–270.en
dc.referencesLeinfelder, R. (2013). Assuming Responsibility for the Anthropocene. Challenges and Opportunities in Education. In H. Trischler (Ed.), Anthropocene. Envisioning the Future of the Age of Humans. Munich: Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society.en
dc.referencesMatviychuk, A. (2014). Ecological Deontology in the Context of Solving the Task of Ecologization of Modern Man Thinking. Problems of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 151–156.en
dc.referencesMcNaughton, D., & Rawling, P. (2007). Deontology. In D. Copp (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesMeadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. The Report for the Club of Rome’s on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.en
dc.referencesMills, M. (2001). The Duty of Being and Association. In J. Berry, & M. Wissenburg (Eds.), Sustaining Liberal Democracy. Ecological Challenges and Opportunities. London: Palgrave Publishers.en
dc.referencesNagel, Th. (1991). Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesNozick, R. (2000). Anarchia, państwo, utopia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.en
dc.referencesRawls, J. (2005). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesReport of the World Commission on Environment and Development “Our Common Future.” (1987). Norway/Oslo: The United Nations General Assembly.en
dc.referencesResearch for Social Change Transformation to Equity and Sustainability – UNRISD Strategy 2016–2020. (2015). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.en
dc.referencesRoberts, N. (1997). The Holocene. An Environmental History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.en
dc.referencesRobeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.en
dc.referencesRobeyns, I. (2006). Capability Approach in Practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.en
dc.referencesRockström, J., Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, III, F. S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Sociology, 14(2), 472–475.en
dc.referencesScanlon, Th. (2000). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesSaja, K. (2015). Etyka normatywna. Między konsekwencalizmem a deontologią. Kraków: Universitas.en
dc.referencesSen, A. (1982). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesSen, A. (2006). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesSen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesSen, A., & Williams, B. (1990). Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesThe Nicomachean Ethics. (2009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesThe Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary. (2015). Oxford: Oxford University Press.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailPłachciak, Adam - adam.plachciak@ue.wroc.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailMukarutesi, Dative - datsmuk@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.23.1.05
dc.relation.volume23


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
8587-Tekst_artykulu-22347-1-10 ...
Rozmiar:
288.1KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0