Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMazur, Marcin
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-28T01:06:09Z
dc.date.available2014-03-28T01:06:09Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1508-1117
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/4003
dc.description.abstractThe general aim of the article is to present the importance of cartographic method of research in the studies of rural areas in spatial dimension. The capabilities of this method of research are rather underestimated in contemporary rural geography. This statement is linked with a common limited understanding of the role of cartography in geographical studies. It is primarily seen as an important way of presenting geographic background for a given area and general conditions for investigated phenomena, as well as a manner of depicting research results and conclusions. Due to this fact, the role of cartography is narrowed down to methods of presentation. Unfortunately, its very significant function as a self-contained method of research often becomes abandoned. Moreover, some possibilities and results of using different methods of presentation tend to be underestimated. In the article, both – different ways of applying cartographic method – and various consequences of selecting a way of cartographic presentation are indicated. Showing the variety of possibilities is illustrated by examples of actual geographical studies.pl_PL
dc.description.abstractCelem artykułu jest wykazanie znaczenia kartograficznej metody badań w badaniach obszarów wiejskich w ujęciu przestrzennym. Możliwości tej metody badań obszarów wiejskich wydają się być w ostatnim czasie niedoceniane. Często rola kartografii w geografii wsi jest ograniczana jedynie do kartograficznej metody prezentacji. W artykule zaprezentowano różne sposoby zastosowań kartograficznej metody badań i kartograficznej metody prezentacji wraz z ilustracją poprzez przykłady konkretnych ich zastosowań w badaniach obszarów wiejskich.
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica;13
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectkartograficzna metoda badańpl_PL
dc.subjectmetodyka kartografiipl_PL
dc.subjectmetody badań geografii wsipl_PL
dc.titleMetoda kartograficzna jako źródło informacji w badaniach obszarów wiejskichpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeCartographic method of research as a source of information in rural studiespl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number41-58pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationZakład Geografii Wsi i Rozwoju Lokalnego. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PANpl_PL
dc.referencesArnberger E., 1971, Kartografia jako nauka oraz jej związki z geografią i geodezją, Przegląd Zagranicznej Literatury Geograficznej, z. 1–2, s. 200‒216.
dc.referencesBertin J., 1967, Semiologie graphique, Paris, Mouton, Gautier-Villars.
dc.referencesBoard C., 1969, Mapy jako modele, Przegląd Zagranicznej Literatury Geograficznej, z. 3–4, s. 7‒55.
dc.referencesBonin S., 1989, Poziomy czytania mapy, „Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny”, t. 21, nr 2, s. 49‒62.
dc.referencesChang K.-T., 1977, Visual estimation of graduated circles, “Canadian Cartographer”, vol. 14, s. 130‒138.
dc.referencesCox C.W., 1976, Anchor effects and the estimation of graduated circles and squares, “American Cartographer”, vol. 3, no 1, s. 65‒74.
dc.referencesCrawford P.V., 1971, Perception of grey-tone symbols, “Annals Association of American Geographers”, vol. 61, no 4, s. 721‒735.
dc.referencesCrawford P.V., 1973, The perception of graduated squares as cartographic symbols, “Cartographic Journal”, vol. 10, no 2, s. 85‒88.
dc.referencesDobson M.W., 1974, Refining legend values for proportional circle maps, “Canadian Cartographer”, vol. 11, no 1, s. 45‒53.
dc.referencesDobson M.W., 1980a, Benchmarking the perceptual mechanism for map-reading task, “Cartographica”, vol. 17, no 1, s. 88‒100.
dc.referencesDobson M.W., 1980b, Perception of continuously shaded maps, “Annals Association of American Geographers”, vol. 70, no 1, s. 106‒107.
dc.referencesFlannery J.J., 1971, The relative effectiveness of some common graduated point symbols in the presentation of quantitative data, “Canadian Cartographer”, vol. 8, no 2, s. 96‒109.
dc.referencesGroop R.E., Cole D., 1978, Overlapping graduated circles: magnitude estimation and method of portrayal, “Canadian Cartographer”, vol. 15, no 2, s. 114‒122.
dc.referencesJenks G.F., 1975, The evaluation and prediction of visual clustering in maps symbolized with proportional circles [w:] Davis J.C., McCullagh J.M. (red.), Display and analysis of spatial data, Wiley & Sons, London–New York–Sydney–Toronto, s. 210‒ 230.
dc.referencesKolacny A., 1969, Cartographic information – a fundamental notion and term in modern cartography, “Cartographic Journal”, vol. 6, no 1, s. 47‒49.
dc.referencesKraak M.-J., Ormeling F., 1998, Kartografia, wizualizacja danych przestrzennych, PWN, Warszawa.
dc.referencesMaddock K.W., Crassini B., 1980, Can estimation of circle size be influenced by instructions?, “Cartography”, vol. 11, no 3, s. 175‒180.
dc.referencesMc Eachern A.M., 2004, How maps work: representation, visualization, and design, Department of Geography Pennsylvania State University, The Guilford Press, New York–London.
dc.referencesMeihoefer H.J., 1969, The utility of the circle as an effective cartographic symbol, “Canadian Cartographer”, vol. 6, no 2, s. 105‒117.
dc.referencesMeihoefer H.J., 1973, The visual perception of the circle in thematic maps: experimental results, “Canadian Cartographer”, vol. 10, no 1, s. 63‒84.
dc.referencesMonmonnier M.S., 1977, Regression-based scaling to facilitate the cross-correlation of graduated circle maps, “Cartographic Journal”, vol. 14, no 2, s. 89‒98.
dc.referencesMonmonnier M.S., 1980, The hopeless pursuit of purification in cartographic communication: a comparison of graphic arts and perceptual distortions of graytone symbols, “Cartographica”, vol. 17, no 1, s. 24‒39.
dc.referencesMuller J.-C., 1979, Perception of continuously shaded maps, “Annals Association of American Geographers”, vol. 69, no 2, s. 240‒249.
dc.referencesMuller J.-C., 1980, Visual comparison of continuously shaded maps, “Cartographica”, vol. 17, no 1, s. 40‒52.
dc.referencesPasławski J., 2006, Wprowadzenie do kartografii i topografii, Wydawnictwo Nowa Era, Wrocław.
dc.referencesRatajski L., 1989, Metodyka kartografii społeczno-gospodarczej, wyd. II, PPWK, Warszawa–Wrocław.
dc.referencesSaliszczew K.A., 1984, Kartografia ogólna, PWN, Warszawa.
dc.referencesSlocum T.A., 1982, Circle size judgment and map design: a comment, “American Cartographer”, vol. 9, no 2, s. 179‒181.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska