In Search of Originality in Central and Eastern European Legal Culture Culture(s). 4th Annual CEENELS Conference: Legal Innovativeness in Central and Eastern Europe, Moscow, 14–15 June 2019
| dc.contributor.author | Szymaniec, Piotr | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-21T19:15:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-21T19:15:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-09-30 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0208-6069 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/40203 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The paper describes the debates which took place during the 4th Annual CEENELS Conference (Moscow, 14–15 June 2019). The aim of the conference was to analyse the issue of legal innovativeness in Central and Eastern Europe, the topic which was chosen as a continuation of previous CEENELS conferences. The organizers wanted to challenge the widespread belief that the legal culture of Central and Eastern Europe lacks original and innovative concepts and ideas. Even if the conference did not bring a definitive answer about the character of Central and Eastern European countries’ legal culture, it showed that the region is not only a territory of legal transplants and reception of legal ideas, concepts and institutions, created in Western Europe or the US. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Artykuł opisuje dyskusje, które miały miejsce podczas IV Konferencji CEENELS (Moskwa, 14–15 czerwca 2019). Celem konferencji była analiza zagadnienia innowacyjności w zakresie prawa w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej. Temat ten został wybrany jako kontynuacja poprzednich konferencji CEENELS. Organizatorzy chcieli podważyć powszechne przekonanie, że w kulturze prawnej Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej brakuje oryginalnych oraz nowatorskich koncepcji i pomysłów. Nawet jeśli konferencja nie przyniosła definitywnej odpowiedzi na temat charakteru kultury prawnej krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, to pokazała, że region ten jest nie tylko terytorium przeszczepów prawnych i recepcji idei, koncepcji i instytucji prawnych, tworzonych w Europie Zachodniej lub USA. | pl |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica | en |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
| dc.subject | legal culture | en |
| dc.subject | Central and Eastern Europe | en |
| dc.subject | Central and Eastern European Network of Legal Scholars | en |
| dc.subject | kultura prawna | pl |
| dc.subject | Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia | pl |
| dc.subject | Central and Eastern European Network of Legal Scholars | pl |
| dc.title | In Search of Originality in Central and Eastern European Legal Culture Culture(s). 4th Annual CEENELS Conference: Legal Innovativeness in Central and Eastern Europe, Moscow, 14–15 June 2019 | en |
| dc.title.alternative | W poszukiwaniu oryginalności kultury prawnej (kultur prawnych) Środkowej i Wschodniej Europy. IV Konferencja Naukowa CEENELS „Legal Innovativeness in Central and Eastern Europe”, Moskwa, 14–15 czerwca 2019 | pl |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.page.number | 141-155 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Angelus Silesius University of Applied Sciences in Wałbrzych | en |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2450-2782 | |
| dc.references | Barak, Aaron. 2012. Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035293 | en |
| dc.references | CEENELS. 2016. “About CEENELS.” CEENELS, July 16, 2016. http://ceenels.org/info/about-ceenels/ [Accessed: 6 December 2019]. | en |
| dc.references | Giaro, Tomasz. 2011. “Legal tradition of Eastern Europe. Its rise and demise.” Comparative Law Review 2(1): 1–23. | en |
| dc.references | Glossary. 2001. “Glossary of statistical terms. Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs).” OECD, September 25, 2001. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=303 [Accessed: 6 December 2019]. | en |
| dc.references | Hendley, Katharine. 2018. “Mapping the career preferences of Russian law graduates.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 25(3): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2018.1481850 | en |
| dc.references | Kischel, Uwe. 2019. Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791355.001.0001 | en |
| dc.references | Kühn, Zdeněk. 2011. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe. Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429005 | en |
| dc.references | Mańko, Rafał. 2020a. “Being Central European, or some reflections on law, double peripherality and the political in times of transformation.” In Central and Eastern Europe as a Double Periphery? 17–46. Edited by Tomáš Gábriš, Ján Sombati. Berlin: Peter Lang. | en |
| dc.references | Mańko, Rafał. 2020b. “Artur Kozak’s Juriscentrist Concept of Law: a Central European Innovation in Legal Theory.” Review of Central and East European Law 45(2–3): 334–375. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja04502003 | en |
| dc.references | Mańko, Rafał. Martin Škop. Marketa Štěpáníková. 2016. “Carving out Central Europe as a space of legal culture: a way out of peripherality?” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics 6(2): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0002 | en |
| dc.references | Marasinova, Elena. 2019. “The Death Penalty Moratorium in 18th-Century Russia.” Quaestio Rossica 7(4): 1086–1106. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2019.4.426 | en |
| dc.references | Marek, Krystyna. 1954. Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law. Geneve: Librairies Droz. | en |
| dc.references | Narits, Raul. 2007. “Principles of Law and Legal Dogmatics as Methods Used by Constitutional Courts.” Juridica International 13: 15–22. | en |
| dc.references | Nelken, David. 2004. “Using The Concept of Legal Culture.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29: 1–26. | en |
| dc.references | Podgórecki, Adam. 1981. “Unrecognized Father of Sociology of Law: Leon Petrażycki. Reflections based on Jan Górecki’s Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrażycki.” Law and Society Review 20(1): 183–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053227 | en |
| dc.references | Podgórecki, Adam. 1991. Sociological Theory of Law. Milano: Giuffrè. | en |
| dc.references | Stambulski, Michał. 2019. “The concept of law in the analytical and post-analytical theory.” In A post-analytical approach to philosophy and theory of law. 57–74. Edited by Andrzej Bator, Zbigniew Pulka. Berlin: Peter Lang. | en |
| dc.references | Stawecki, Tomasz. 2010. “Precedens w polskim porządku prawnym. Pojęcie i wnioski de lege ferenda.” [Precedent in the Polish legal order. The concept and conclusions de lege ferenda]. In Precedens w polskim systemie prawa [Precedent in the Polish legal system]. 59–98. Edited by Anna Śledzińska-Simon, Mirosław Wyrzykowski. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski. | en |
| dc.references | Stelmachowski, Andrzej. 1967. “Prawotwórcza rola sądów (w świetle orzecznictwa cywilnego).” [The law-making role of courts (in the light of civil law)]. Państwo i Prawo 4–5: 611–626. | en |
| dc.references | Szymaniec, Piotr. 2018. “Discussion about the Legal Identity of Central and Eastern Europe. 3rd Annual CEENELS Conference ‘Legal Identities and Legal Traditions in CEE’.” Acta Universitatis Lodzienis. Folia Iuridica 85: 139–153. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.85.11 | en |
| dc.references | Szymaniec, Piotr. Ed. 2015. Zasada proporcjonalności a ochrona praw podstawowych w państwach Europy. [The Principle of Proportionality and the Protection of the Fundamental Rights in the European States]. Wałbrzych: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane PWSZ im. Angelusa Silesiusa w Wałbrzychu. | en |
| dc.references | Totyev, Konstantin. 2016. “Business transaction invalidity in the context of the principle of legality.” Russian Law Journal 4(4): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-4-81-94 | en |
| dc.references | Zomerski, Wojciech. 2016. “Conference report: 1st International Conference of the Central European Network of Legal Scholars (CENELS) on ‘25 Years After the Transformation: Law and Legal Culture in Central and Eastern Europe. Between Continuity and Discontinuity,’ Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, 16–17 April 2015.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 4(2): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2015-0017 | en |
| dc.references | Zomerski, Wojciech. 2017. “Conference Report: 2nd Annual Conference of the Central and Eastern European Network of Legal Scholars (CEENELS): ‘An Uneasy Legacy: Remnants of Socialist Legal and Political Thinking in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Law and Administration, 7–8 January 2017.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 7(2): 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0019 | en |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | pszymaniec@poczta.onet.pl | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/0208-6069.96.11 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 96 |
Pliki tej pozycji
Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0