Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Facial Recognition and Posthuman Technologies in Shakespeare’s Sonnets

dc.contributor.authorDarcy, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T14:15:19Z
dc.date.available2022-03-25T14:15:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2083-8530
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/41324
dc.description.abstractThe human face, real and imagined, has long figured into various forms of cultural and personal recognition—to include citizenship, in both the modern and the ancient world. But beyond affiliations related to borders and government, the human face has also figured prominently into biometrics that feed posthuman questions and anxieties. For while one requirement of biometrics is concerned with “unicity,” or that which identifies an individual as unique, another requirement is that it identify “universality,” confirming an individual’s membership in the species. Shakespeare’s sonnets grapple with the crisis of encountering a universal beauty in a unique specimen to which Time and Nature nonetheless afford no special privilege. Between fair and dark lies a posthuman lament over the injustice of natural law and the social valorizations arbitrarily marshaled to defend it.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMulticultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance;39en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectShakespeare’s sonnetsen
dc.subjectfacial recognitionen
dc.subjectDark Ladyen
dc.subjectfair youthen
dc.subjectNatureen
dc.subjectTimeen
dc.subjectposthumanismen
dc.subjectbiometricsen
dc.subjectfaceen
dc.subjectWoody Bledsoeen
dc.titleFacial Recognition and Posthuman Technologies in Shakespeare’s Sonnetsen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number153-167
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha, USAen
dc.identifier.eissn2300-7605
dc.referencesAgamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998.en
dc.referencesAgamben, Giorgio. “No to Bio-Political Tattooing.” Le Monde 10 January 2004.en
dc.referencesAgamben, Giorgio. States of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005.en
dc.referencesBledsoe, Woody. “I Had a Dream: AAAI Presidential Address, 19 August 1985.” AI Magazine 7.1 (1986): 57-61 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1986.tb02176.xen
dc.references“A Brief History of Facial Recognition.” 26 May 2020. NEC: Orchestrating a Brighter World https://www.nec.co.nz/market-leadership/publications-media/a-briefhistory-of-facial-recognition/ Accessed 5 July 2021.en
dc.referencesCampana, Joseph, and Scott Maisano, eds. Renaissance Posthumanism. New York: Fordham, 2016.en
dc.referencesColebrook, Claire. Death of the Posthuman: Essays on Extinction, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.12329362.0001.001 Accessed 15 July 2021.en
dc.referencesDeleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. “Year Zero: Faciality.” A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. by Brian Massumi, 167-91. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.en
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. Dits et écrits. Vols. 3-4. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.en
dc.referencesHokama, Rhema. “Love’s Rites: Performing Prayer in Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” Shakespeare Quarterly 63.2 (2012): 199-223 https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2012.0032en
dc.referencesKing, Martin Luther, Jr. “I Have a Dream.” 28 August 1963. NPR. 18 January 2010 https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety Accessed 15 July 2021.en
dc.referencesKnapp, James A., ed. Shakespeare and the Power of the Face. 2015. London: Routledge, 2019 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315608655en
dc.referencesLatour, Bruno. “An Attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto.’” New Literary History 41.3 (2010): 471-90.en
dc.referencesLatour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1993.en
dc.referencesLevinas, Emmanuel. “The Face.” In Ethics and Infinity, trans. Richard A. Cohen, Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 1985. 83-92.en
dc.referencesLiggett, John. The Human Face. New York: Stein & Day, 1974.en
dc.referencesLoh, Maria H. “Renaissance Faciality.” Oxford Art Journal 32.3 (2009): 341-63 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcp032en
dc.referencesMcCoy, Richard C. “Love’s Martyrs: Shakespeare’s ‘Turtle and Phoenix’ and the Sacrificial Sonnets.” Religion and Culture in Renaissance England, eds. Claire McEachern and Debora Shuger, Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 188-208.en
dc.referencesMordini, Emilio, and Sonia Massari. “Body, Biometrics and Identity.” Bioethics 22.9 (2008): 488-98.en
dc.referencesNardizzi, Vin. “Shakespeare’s Penknife: Grafting and Seedless Generation in the Procreation Sonnets.” Renaissance and Reformation 32.1 (2009): 83-106 https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v32i1.9591en
dc.referencesPerkowitz, Sidney. “The Bias in the Machine: Facial Recognition Technology and Racial Disparities.” MIT Case Studies in Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.62272586. 5 February 2021 15 July 2021.en
dc.referencesRaber, Karen. Shakespeare and Posthumanist Theory. Arden: London, 2018.en
dc.referencesRaviv, Shaun. “The Secret History of Facial Recognition.” Wired 28.2 (February 2020) https://www.wired.com/story/secret-history-facial-recognition/ Accessed 19 July 2021.en
dc.referencesRogers, Mary. Review of Renaissance Self-Portraiture: The Visual Construction of Identity and the Social Status of the Artist, by Joanna Woods-Marsden, and The Image of the Individual: Portraits in the Renaissance, by Nicholas Mann and Luke Syson, eds. Renaissance Studies 14.3 (2000): 375-78.en
dc.referencesSchmitt, Carl. Political Theology. Trans. George Schwab. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.en
dc.referencesSeamon, John G. “Dynamic Facial Recognition: Examination of a Natural Phenomenon.” American Journal of Psychology 95.3 (1982): 363-81 https://doi.org/10.2307/1422130en
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. The Sonnets. Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt, et al., 3rd ed. New York: Norton, 2016. 2241-303.en
dc.referencesShannon, Laurie. “Poor, Bare Forked: Animal Sovereignty, Human Negative Exceptionalism, and the Natural History of King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly 60.2 (2009): 168-96.en
dc.referencesSorel, Charles. The Extravagant Shepherd. Translated by John Davies. London: Newcomb, 1654.en
dc.referencesSwarbrick, Steven, and Karen Raber. “Introduction: Renaissance Posthumanism and Its Afterlives.” Criticism 62.3 (2020): 313-28 https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.62.3.0313en
dc.referencesTaylor-Alexander, Samuel. “How the Face Became an Organ.” Somatosphere: Science, Medicine, and Anthropology. 11 August 2014 http://somatosphere.net/2014/how-the-face-became-an-organ.html/ Accessed 15 July 2021.en
dc.referencesTsui, Jenna. “Why Gender Neutral Facial Recognition Will Change How We Look at Technology.” https://www.technologynetworks.com/informatics/articles/whygender-neutral-facial-recognition-will-change-how-we-look-at-technology-332962 Accessed 15 July 2021.en
dc.referencesTyson, Neil deGrasse. “A Mind-Expanding Tour of the Cosmos with Neil deGrasse Tyson and Robert Krulwich.” 92nd Street Y. 92YOnDemand.org. 10 May 2017. YouTube https://youtube.com/watch?v=AyAK3QBnMGQ Accessed 15 July 2021.en
dc.referencesWilliams, Damien Patrick. “Fitting the Description: Historical and Sociotechnical Elements of Facial Recognition and Anti-Black Surveillance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7, sup. 1: 74-83 https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1831365 Accessed 15 July 2021.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailrdarcy@unomaha.edu
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2083-8530.24.10
dc.relation.volume24


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
153-167_Darcy.pdf
Rozmiar:
582.8KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0