Show simple item record

Czy badać? Co badać? Jak badać? Strategie badawcze w naukach społecznych i humanistycznych w pierwszej fali pandemii COVID-19

dc.contributor.authorKalinowska, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorBielska, Beata
dc.contributor.authorMęcfal, Sylwia
dc.contributor.authorSurmiak, Adrianna
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-01T10:53:05Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01T10:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/44457
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to describe the research strategies carried out by female and male researchers in the social sciences and humanities during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The empirical research which the article is based on was conducted in April and May 2020 using an online qualitative survey. As a result of the qualitative content analysis of our research participants’ statements, we characterized four research strategies: resignation, suspension, continuation, and research (re)construction. We describe the results of the analyses in relation to the characteristics of disaster research. We indicate that research in a pandemic is relatable to the slow disaster research perspective more than to the disaster research perspective.en
dc.description.abstractCelem opracowania jest opis strategii badawczych podejmowanych przez badaczki i badaczy z obszaru nauk społecznych i humanistycznych w czasie pierwszej fali pandemii COVID-19. Badania empiryczne będące podstawą artykułu realizowane były w kwietniu i maju 2020 roku przy użyciu techniki ankiety jakościowej online. W wyniku jakościowej analizy treści wypowiedzi uczestników i uczestniczek naszych badań scharakteryzowałyśmy cztery strategie badawcze: rezygnację, zawieszenie, kontynuację i (re)konstrukcję badań. Wyniki analiz opisujemy w odniesieniu do cech charakterystycznych nurtu disaster research. Pokazujemy, że badania w pandemii są bliższe perspektywie slow disaster research niż disaster research.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej;4pl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectresearch strategiesen
dc.subjectresearch with researchersen
dc.subjectresearch during the pandemicen
dc.subjectthe COVID-19 pandemicen
dc.subjectdisaster researchen
dc.subjectslow disaster researchen
dc.subjectstrategie badawczepl
dc.subjectbadania z badaczami i badaczkamipl
dc.subjectbadania w pandemiipl
dc.subjectpandemia COVID-19pl
dc.subjectdisaster researchpl
dc.subjectslow disaster researchpl
dc.titleCzy badać? Co badać? Jak badać? Strategie badawcze w naukach społecznych i humanistycznych w pierwszej fali pandemii COVID-19pl
dc.title.alternativeTo Conduct Research or Not? What Kind of Research? And How? Research Strategies of Social and Humanities Researchers During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemicen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number34-59
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationKalinowska, Katarzyna - Collegium Civitaspl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationBielska, Beata - Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniupl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMęcfal, Sylwia - Uniwersytet Łódzkipl
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationSurmiak, Adrianna - Uniwersytet Warszawskipl
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8069
dc.referencesBabbie Earl (2004) Badania społeczne w praktyce. Tłum. Witold Betkiewicz, Marta Bucholc, Przemysław Gadomski, Jacek Haman, Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz, Agnieszka Kloskowska-Dudzińska, Michał Kowalski, Maja Mozga. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl
dc.referencesBraun Virginia, Clarke Victoria, Boulton Elicia, Davey Louise, McEvoy Charolotte (2020) The Online Survey as a Qualitative Research Tool. „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, vol. 24(6), s. 641–654 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550pl
dc.referencesHall Johanna, Gaved Mark, Sargent Julia (2021) Participatory Research Approaches in Times of Covid-19: A Narrative Literature Review. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, no. 20, s. 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211010087pl
dc.referencesHans Luis-Charles M., Howard Rosalyn, Remy Lionel, Nibbs Farah, Turner Grace (2020) Ethical Considerations for Postdisaster Fieldwork and Data Collection in the Caribbean. „American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 64(8), s. 1162–1178 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938113pl
dc.referencesKnowles Scott G. (2014) Learning from Disaster? The History of Technology and the Future of Disaster Research. „Technology and Culture”, vol. 55(4), s. 773–784 https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2014.0110pl
dc.referencesKnowles Scott G. (2020) Slow Disaster in the Anthropocene: A Historian Witnesses Climate Change on the Korean Peninsula. „Daedalus”, vol. 149(4), s. 192–206 https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01827pl
dc.referencesKnowles Scott G., Neal David M. (2021) Disaster Research in COVID Times. „COVIDCalls” podcast, odcinek z 1.10.2021 https://www.podbean.com/ew/pb-brbhs-10f40a0 [dostęp: 26.01.2022].pl
dc.referencesKvale Steinar (2012) Prowadzenie wywiadów. Tłum. Agata Dziuban. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.pl
dc.referencesLawrence Leigh (2020) Conducting cross-cultural qualitative interviews with mainland Chinese participants during COVID: Lessons from the field. „Qualitative Research”, vol. 22(1), s. 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120974157pl
dc.referencesMelis Gulia, Sala Emanuela, Zaccaria Daniele (2022) Remote Recruiting and Video-Interviewing Older People: A Research Note on A Qualitative Case Study Carried Out in The First Covid-19 Red Zone in Europe. „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”, vol. 25(4), s. 477–482 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1913921pl
dc.referencesMeskell Pauline, Houghton Catherine, Biesty Linda (2021) Opening Windows Behind Closed Doors: Reflections on Working Qualitatively During a Pandemic. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211008313pl
dc.referencesMęcfal Sylwia, Surmiak Adrianna, Ślęzak Izabela, Bielska Beata, Dębska Katarzyna, Golczyńska-Grondas Agnieszka, Kalinowska Katarzyna, Kuźma Inga, Palęcka Alicja, Wójtewicz Anna (2020) Badania społeczne i humanistyczne w czasach pandemii – aspekty etyczno-metodologiczne. Dyskusja podczas „Spotkań Badaczek”. „Przegląd Socjologiczny”, t. LXIX, nr 3, s. 203–214 https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2020/69.3/10pl
dc.referencesMinisterstwo Edukacji i Nauki (2020) Funkcjonowanie uczelni po 28 grudnia 2020 r. – zmiany w obostrzeniach https://www.gov.pl/web/edukacja-i-nauka/funkcjonowanie-uczelni-po-28-grudnia-2020-r--zmiany-w-obostrzeniach [dostęp: 12.01.2022].pl
dc.referencesMwambari David, Purdeková Andrea, Bisoka Aymar Nyenyezi (2021) Covid-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering. „Qualitative Research”, s. 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121999014pl
dc.referencesNeal David M. (1997) Reconsidering the Phases of Disaster. „International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters”, vol. 15(2), s. 239–264.pl
dc.referencesNeuert Cornelia E., Meitinger Katharina, Behr Dorothée, Schonlau Matthias (2021) Editorial: The Use of Open-ended Questions in Surveys. „Methods, Data, Analyses”, vol. 15(1), s. 3–6.pl
dc.referencesNobrega Suzanne, El Ghaziri Mazen, Giacobbe Lauren, Rice Serena, Punnett Laura, Edwards Kasper (2021) Feasibility of Virtual Focus Groups in Program Impact Evaluation. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019896pl
dc.referencesO’Cathain Alicia, Thomas Kate J. (2004) “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? „BMC Medical Research Methodology”, vol. 4 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25pl
dc.referencesPandemia Covid-19 a metodyka badań społecznych (b.d.) https://metodyspol.covid.uj.edu.pl/ [dostęp: 12.01.2022].pl
dc.referencesPandley Kritika, Parreñas Rhacel Salazar, Sabio Gianne Sheena (2021) Essential and Expendable: Migrant Domestic Workers and the COVID-19 Pandemic. „American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 65(10), s. 1287–1301 https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211000396pl
dc.referencesPatton Michael Q. (2014) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.pl
dc.referencesPeek Lori, Champeau Heather, Austin Jessica, Mathews Mason, Wu Haorui (2020) What Methods Do Social Scientists Use to Study Disasters? An Analysis of the Social Science Extreme Events Research Network. „American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 64(8), s. 1066–1094 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938105pl
dc.referencesQuarantelli Enrico L., Dynes Russel R. (1977) Response to Social Crisis and Disaster. „Annual Review of Sociology”, vol. 3, s. 23–49 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.03.080177.000323pl
dc.referencesRahman Syahirah Abdul, Tuckerman Lauren, Vorley Tim, Gherhes Cristian (2021) Resilient Research in the Field: Insights and Lessons from Adapting Qualitative Research Projects During the COVID-19 Pandemic. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016106pl
dc.referencesSinger Eleonor, Couper Mick P. (2017) Some Methodological Uses of Responses to Open Questions and Other Verbatim Comments in Quantitative Surveys. „Methods, Data, Analyses: A Journal for Quantitative Methods and Survey Methodology (mda)”, vol. 11(2), s. 115–134 https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2017.01pl
dc.referencesSitek Wojciech (1997) Wspólnota i zagrożenie. Wrocławianie wobec wielkiej powodzi. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.pl
dc.referencesSteherenberger Cécile S. (2020) Disaster Studies as Politics with Other Means: Covid-19 and the Legacies of Cold War Disaster Research https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/disaster-studies/disaster-studies-as-politics-with-other-means-covid-19-and-the-legacies-of-cold-war-disaster-research/ [dostęp: 4.12.2021].pl
dc.referencesSurmiak Adrianna, Bielska Beata, Kalinowska Katarzyna (2022) Social Researchers’ Approaches to Research Ethics During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Study. „Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics”, vol. 17(1.2), s. 213–222 https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211055056pl
dc.referencesTeti Michelle, Schatz Enid, Liebenberg Linda (2020) Methods in the Time of COVID-19: The Vital Role of Qualitative Inquiries. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 19(51), s. 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962pl
dc.referencesTremblay Stephanie, Castiglione Sonia, Audet Li-Anne, Desmarais Michèle, Horace Minnie, Peláez Sandra (2021) Conducting Qualitative Research to Respond to COVID-19 Challenges: Reflections for the Present and Beyond. „International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 20, s. 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679pl
dc.referencesUNICOV: Akademia w trakcie pandemii. Doświadczenia i organizacja pracy na polskich uczelniach (b.d.) https://www.krasp.org.pl/resources/upload/Inne_dokumenty_KRASP/prezentacje/prezentacje_ZP_160604/A_Cislak_Wojcik.pdf [dostęp: 12.01.2022].pl
dc.referencesVan Brown Bethany L. (2020) Disaster Research “Methics”: Ethical and Methodological Considerations of Researching Disaster-Affected Populations. „American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 64(8), s. 1050–1065 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938115pl
dc.referencesWalker Crystal M., Williams Loretta A., Bowdre Trimika (2021) Lessons Learned in Abruptly Switching from In-Person to Remote Data Collection in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic. „The Qualitative Report”, vol. 26(8), s. 2382–2389 https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4745pl
dc.referencesWeil Frederick D. (2020) Researching Crime After a Disaster: What We Can Learn from a Large Survey in New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina. „American Behavioral Scientist”, vol. 64(8), s. 1111–1128 https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938107pl
dc.referencesŻuchowska-Skiba Dorota (2021) Społeczny wymiar Internetu z perspektywy osób z niepełnosprawnościami w czasie pandemii Covid-19. „Przegląd Socjologiczny”, t. LXX, nr 3, s. 31–47 https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2021/70.3/2pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailKalinowska, Katarzyna - k.kalinosia@wp.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailBielska, Beata - bielska.beata@umk.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailMęcfal, Sylwia - sylwia.mecfal@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailSurmiak, Adrianna - a.surmiak@uw.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8069.18.4.02
dc.relation.volume18


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
34-59_Kalinowska_et_al..pdf
Size:
867.7Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0