Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLipińska-Grobelny, Agnieszka
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-12T10:26:28Z
dc.date.available2014-05-12T10:26:28Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1427-969X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/4455
dc.description.abstractThe 1960’s view of gender role orientation held that masculinity and femininity were at opposite ends of the same continuum. Bem challenged this concept by suggesting that masculinity and femininity were actually separate continuums, allowing individuals to endorse both characteristics. Bem described four categories of gender: sex-typed individuals, androgynous individuals, undifferentiated individuals and cross-sex-typed individuals. The authoress of this article conducted researches, delivering five techniques: IPP by Kuczyńska, NEO-FFI by Costa & McCrae, PTS by Strelau & Zawadzki, SD by Ray and MSS by Merrill & Reid to the group of 145 persons. The results indicate several significant differences that may be applied to various domains of life for example to the procedure of recruitment and selection.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.subjectgenderpl_PL
dc.subjectpersonal conditionspl_PL
dc.titlePodmiotowe uwarunkowania męskości, kobiecości i androgyniipl_PL
dc.title.alternativePersonal conditions of masculinity, femininity and androgynypl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number3-19pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record