Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorİzmir, Sibel
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-28T06:18:54Z
dc.date.available2023-07-28T06:18:54Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-30
dc.identifier.issn2083-8530
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/47708
dc.description.abstractTurkey is among those Non-Anglophone countries which have had a keen interest in Shakespeare and his plays for over two hundred years. When it comes to the staging of Shakespeare in Turkey, especially when protagonists or leading roles are considered, “overacting” is one of the most notable techniques highlighting, presumably, the spirit of the Renaissance and Jacobean times. Still, in recent years, there have been some productions which try to challenge and deconstruct the traditional ways of staging a Shakespearean play. One of such productions is Hamlet of Istanbul State Theatre, directed by Işıl Kasapoğlu in 2014, in which the director makes use of postdramatic theatre techniques. As the play begins, the audience sees a huge red jewel box which has been placed onto the centre of the stage. Soon after it is opened, it becomes clear that the character coming out of the box is playing and enacting not only the role of Hamlet but also many other roles in the play. Disrupting the habitual Shakespearean staging which heavily relies on mimesis in a closed “fictive cosmos” (Lehmann 22), the production, more strikingly, allows for an innovative Shakespearean acting as an innovative Shakespearean acting possible as the actor acts out all the major roles, such as Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, Ophelia, Polonius, etc., in such various ways as holding dummies in his hands and enacting their roles in monologues and dialogues. Fusing Hans-Thies Lehmann’s theory of postdramatic theatre with Jill Dolan’s argumentation on utopian performative, this study will investigate how postdramatic theatre techniques challenge the traditional Shakespearean performance and contends that postdramatic theatre techniques used in Kasapoğlu’s Hamlet contribute to the utopian performative and the possibility of creating a utopian impulse in the audience. The paper thus will claim that postdramatic performance of Hamlet renders a utopian performative possible by presenting a transformative potential in the audience members which engages in our present moment.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMulticultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance;41en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectutopian performativeen
dc.subjectpostdramatic Hamlet in Turkeyen
dc.subjectpostdramatic theatreen
dc.subjectJill Dolanen
dc.subjectHans Thies-Lehmannen
dc.titleTransformative Potential and Utopian Performative: Postdramatic Hamlet in Turkeyen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number71-85
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAtılım University, Turkeyen
dc.identifier.eissn2300-7605
dc.referencesAdiseshiah, Siân. “Utopian Space in Caryl Churchill’s History Plays: Light Shining in Buckinghamshire and Vinegar Tom.” Utopian Studies 16.1 (2005): 3-26.en
dc.referencesAvcı, Zeynep. Cumhuriyet. 25 Nisan 2014. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/shakespeare-olmasa-ne-yapardik-64951/ Accessed on 18 August 2022.en
dc.referencesAvcı, Zeynep. https://www.gazipasahaberler.com/HaberDetay/21117/Zeynep-Avci-Ile-Shakespeare-Ve-Hamlet-Uzerine---.html/ Accessed 20 July 2022.en
dc.referencesBilgiç, Ali. “Reclaiming the National Will: Resilience of Turkish Authoritarian Neoliberalism after Gezi.” South European Society and Politics 23.2 (2018): 259-280.en
dc.referencesBrook, Peter. The Empty Space. Touchstone: New York, 1996.en
dc.referencesCraik, Katharine A., ed. Shakespeare and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge U P, 2020.en
dc.referencesDolan, Jill. Utopia in Performance. Finding Hope at the Theatre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005.en
dc.referencesFuchs, Elinor. “Utopia in Performance: Finding Hope at the Theatre. By Jill Dolan.” Theatre Research International, 32.2 (2007): 198-199.en
dc.referencesGajowski, Evelyn. “Beyond Historicism: Presentism, Subjectivity, Politics”. Literature Compass 7.8 (2010): 674-691.en
dc.referencesGrady, Hugh. “Shakespeare Studies, 2005: A Situated Overview.” Shakespeare: A Journal 1.1 (2005): 102-120.en
dc.referencesGrady, Hugh and Terence Hawkes, eds. Presentist Shakespeares. London: Routledge, 2007.en
dc.referencesIzmir, Sibel. “The Oscillation Between Dramatic and Postdramatic Theatre: Mark Ravenhill’s Shopping and F***ing.” AAA: Arbeiten Aus Anglistik Und Amerikanistik 42.1 (2017): 71-99.en
dc.referencesKasapoğlu, Işıl. Arka Kapak Dergisi. 32 (2018). https://arkakapak.babil.com/arka-kapak-mayis-2018-sayisinda-dosya-konusu-hamlet/ Accessed 25 July 2022.en
dc.referencesKlaić, Dragan. The Plot of the Future: Utopia and Dystopia in Modern Drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.en
dc.referencesLehmann, Hans-Thies. Postdramatic Theatre. Trans. Karen Jürs-Munby, Abington: Routledge, 2006.en
dc.referencesLetsch, Constanze. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/31/istanbul-protesters-violent-clashes-police/ Accessed 24 January 2023.en
dc.referencesShakespeare, William. The Arden Shakespeare Complete Works. Eds. Richard Proudfoot et al. Revised Edition. London, Bloomsbury, 2012.en
dc.referencesSmith, Emma. This is Shakespeare. How to Read the World’s Greatest Playwright. Pelican, 2019.en
dc.referencesWessendorf, Marcus. “The Postdramatic Theatre of Richard Maxwell,” unpublished manuscript (2003) available online at http://www2.hawaii.edu/~wessendo/Maxwell.htm Accessed 1 March 2023.en
dc.contributor.authorEmailsibel.izmir@atilim.edu.tr
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2083-8530.26.05
dc.relation.volume26


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0