Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorJaskiernia, Jerzy
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T14:38:19Z
dc.date.available2023-09-26T14:38:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-26
dc.identifier.issn0208-6069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/47984
dc.description.abstractThe subject of the analysis is the model of legal and constitutional responsibility of the president of the United States in the light of the latest experience of its application to the presidents: Richard M. Nixon, Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. The author focused on the question of how highly politicized this procedure is when the impeachment is formulated by the House of Representatives and judged by the Senate. The conducted analysis does not allow to answer this question unequivocally. The elements of politicization, although undoubtedly present, do not allow to equate this procedure with the model of political responsibility present in parliamentary-cabinet systems.en
dc.description.abstractPrzedmiotem analizy jest model odpowiedzialności prawnokonstytucyjnej prezydenta Stanów Zjednoczonych w świetle najnowszych doświadczeń jego zastosowania wobec prezydentów: Richarda M. Nixona, Billa Clintona i Donalda Trumpa. W centrum uwagi autora znalazła się kwestia, w jak dużym stopniu mamy tu do czynienia z upolitycznieniem tej procedury w sytuacji, gdy akt oskarżenia formułuje Izba Reprezentantów, a sądzi Senat. Przeprowadzona analiza nie pozwala jednoznacznie odpowiedzieć na to pytanie. Elementy upolitycznienia, choć niewątpliwie obecne, nie pozwalają na zrównanie tej procedury z modelem odpowiedzialności politycznej, występującej w systemach parlamentarno-gabinetowych.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridicaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectU.S. Constitutionen
dc.subjectpresidenten
dc.subjectimpeachmenten
dc.subjectRichard M. Nixonen
dc.subjectBill Clintonen
dc.subjectDonald Trumpen
dc.subjectKonstytucja Stanów Zjednoczonychpl
dc.subjectprezydentpl
dc.subjectimpeachmentpl
dc.subjectRichard M. Nixonpl
dc.subjectBill Clintonpl
dc.subjectDonald Trumppl
dc.titleModel odpowiedzialności prawnokonstytucyjnej Prezydenta Stanów Zjednoczonych w świetle najnowszych doświadczeń zastosowania procedury impeachmentupl
dc.title.alternativeModel of legal and constitutional responsibility of the President of the United States in the light of recent experience of the application of the impeachment procedureen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number77-93
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcachpl
dc.identifier.eissn2450-2782
dc.referencesAltshuler, Fred H. 2000. „Comparing the Nixon and Clinton Impeachments”. The Hastings Law Journal 51(4): 745–752.pl
dc.referencesAmar, Vikram D. Jason Mazzone. 2020. „The Power to ‘Try’ Cases of Impeachment: Some Reflections on the Finality, Transparency and Integrity of Senate Adjudications of Presidential Impeachments (Including That of Donald J. Trump)”. Chicago-Kent Law Review 95(2): 456–473.pl
dc.referencesArmaly, Miles T. Adam M. Enders. 2021. „Affective Polarization and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court”. Political Research Quarterly (75)2: 409–424.pl
dc.referencesAschenbrenner, Peter J. 2000. „The United States of America – Impeachment Proceedings Against President Donald J. Trump”. Public Law 2: 377–379.pl
dc.referencesBade, Rachael. Karoun Demirjian. 2022. Unchecked: The Untold Story Behind Congress’s Bothed Impeachments of Donald Trump. New York: William Morrow.pl
dc.referencesBentelli, Anthony M. 2006. „The Spatial Model of the Trial of President Clinton”. American Political Research 34(4): 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X05282848pl
dc.referencesBerger, Raoul. 1973. Impeachment. The Constitutional Problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.pl
dc.referencesBlack, Charles L. Jr. Phillip Bobbitt. 2018. Impeachment: A Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5cgb9rpl
dc.referencesBlum, Jennifer L. 1994. „How Much Prices Is Due: The Senate Impeachment Trial Process After Nixon v. United States”. Catholic University Law Review 44(1): 243–278.pl
dc.referencesBowman, Frank O. 2019. High Crimes and Misdemeanors: A History of Impeachment for the Age of Trump. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl
dc.referencesBroughton, J. Richard. 2021. „The Second Article and Congressional Self-Defense”. Houston Law Review 59: 259–311.pl
dc.referencesBrown, Lowell. 2022. Prosecution of the President of the United States: The Constitution, Executive Power, and the Rule of Law. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81373-4pl
dc.referencesBusby, Robert. 2001. Defending the American Presidency: Clinton and the Lewinsky Scandal. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333992708pl
dc.referencesCohen, Daniel. 2000. Impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton. Brookfield: Twenty-First Century Books.pl
dc.referencesConyers, John Jr. 1974. „Why Nixon Should Have Been Impeached”. Black Politics 6(2): 2–8.pl
dc.referencesCornyn, John. 2019. „Statement for the Record: Impeachment Trial of Donald John Trump”. Texas Review of Law and Politics 24(2): 340–353.pl
dc.referencesCramer Brownell, Kathryn. 2021. „The Impeachment of Bill Clinton”. American Heritage 66(2): 6.pl
dc.referencesCrump, David. 2019. „Does Impeachment by Conviction Create Undue Prejudice? An Experiment and an Analysis”. Akron Law Review 53(1): 1–30.pl
dc.referencesEngel, John A. Jon Meachan. Timoty Naftali. Peter Baker. 2018. Impeachment: An American History. New York: Modern Library.pl
dc.referencesErskine, Daniel H. 2010. „The Age of Impeachment: American Constitutional Culture Since 1960”. The American Journal of Legal History 2: 223–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/50.2.223pl
dc.referencesFakdadebo, Omololu. 2019. Impeachment in Nigerian Presidential System: Challenges, Successes and the Way Forward. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6041-5pl
dc.referencesFandos, Nicholas. Michael D. Shear. 2019. „Trump Impeached for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress”. The New York Times 18 December.pl
dc.referencesFein, Ron. John Bonifaz. Ben Clements. 2018. Constitutional Demans It: The Case of the Impeachment of Donald Trump. London–New York: Melville House.pl
dc.referencesFranklin, Daniel P. Stanley M. Caress. Robert M. Sanders. Cole D. Taratoot. 2020. The Politics of Presidential Impeachment. Albany: State University of New York.pl
dc.referencesFry, Brian R. John S. Stolarek. 1981. „The Nixon Impeachment Vote: A Speculative Analysis”. Presidential Studies Quarterly: 11(3): 387–394.pl
dc.referencesGenovese, Michael A. 2018. „Impeachment Revisited in the Age of Trump: Book Review Essay”. Presidential Studies Quarterly 3: 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12465pl
dc.referencesGerhard, Michael J. 1994. Rediscovering Nonjusticiability: Judicial Review of Impeachments After Nixon. Durham: Duke University School of Law. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372872pl
dc.referencesGerhardt, Michael J. 2019. The Federal Impeachment Process: A Constitutional and Historical Analysis. Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226554976.001.0001pl
dc.referencesGinsburg, Tom. Aziz Huq. David Landau. 2019. The Uses and Abuses of Presidential Impeachment. Chicago: University of Chicago Law School.pl
dc.referencesGoldstein, Joel K. 2021. „The Senate, the Trump Impeachment Trial and Constitutional Morality”. Chicago Kent Law Review 95(2): 475–495.pl
dc.referencesGorod, Brianne. Elizabeth Wydra. 2019. „High Crimes: The In-depth Case for Trump’s Impeachment”. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/155643/trump-articles-of-impeachment-high-crimes (dostęp: 22.03.2022).pl
dc.referencesGraff, Garret M. 2022. A Watergate: A New History. New York: Avid Reader Press.pl
dc.referencesGunther, Gerald. 1974. „Judicial Hegemony and Legislative Autonomy: The ‘Nixon’ Case and Impeachment Process”. UCLA Law Review 22: 30–39.pl
dc.referencesHinojosa, Victor J. Anibal S. Perez-Linan. 2006. „Presidential Survival and the Impeachment Process: The United States and Columbia”. Political Science Quarterly 4: 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2006.tb00585.xpl
dc.referencesHirsh, Allan. 2018. Impeaching the President: Past, Present, and the Future. San Francisco: City Lights Book.pl
dc.referencesHodak, George. 2009. „Clinton Impeached”. ABA Journal 95(12): 72.pl
dc.referencesJacobson, Gary C. 1999. „Impeachment Politics in the 1998 Congressional Elections”. Political Science Quarterly 114(1): 31–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657990pl
dc.referencesJaskiernia, Jerzy. 1975. „Zagadnienie podstaw do wszczęcia procedury impeachment przeciwko urzędnikom federalnym w prawie i praktyce ustrojowej Stanów Zjednoczonych”. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 4: 119–135.pl
dc.referencesKatyal, Neal. 2019. Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump. Boston–New York: Mariner Books, Houghton Muffin Harcourt.pl
dc.referencesKlepeis, Alicia. 2018. Understanding the Impeachment Process. New York: PowerKids Press.pl
dc.referencesKranz, Harry. 1973. „Count One for Impeachment: Nixon v. The First Amendment”. Human Rights 3(2): 173–210.pl
dc.referencesKraśnicka, Izabela. 2021. „Odsunięcie prezydenta od władzy na mocy XXV Poprawki do amerykańskiej Konstytucji”. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 3: 319–330. https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.03.21pl
dc.referencesKraśnicka, Izabela. 2022. „Dwukrotny impeachment prezydenta Donalda Trumpa jako precedens w historii Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki”. Przegląd Sejmowy 2: 85–108. https://doi.org/10.31268/PS.2022.100pl
dc.referencesKrent, Harold J. 2020. „Can President Trump Be Impeached as Mr. Trump? Exploring the Temporal Dimension of Impeachments”. Chicago-Kent Law Review 95(2): 537–549.pl
dc.referencesLavelle, M. Ackerman, E. 1998. „Perjury and the President”. U.S. News & World Report 125(13): 22.pl
dc.referencesLee, Don S. Soonae Park. 2021. „Bureaucratic Responsiveness in Times of Political Crisis: The Case of Presidential Impeachment”. Public Administration 3: 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12701pl
dc.referencesLichtman, Allan J. 2017. The Case for Impeachment. New York: Dey Street Books.pl
dc.referencesMorin, Isobel V. 1996. Impeaching the President. Brookfield: Millbrook Press.pl
dc.referencesNeumann, Richard K. Jr. 2007. „The Revival of Impeachment as a Partisan Political Weapon”. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 24(2): 161–327.pl
dc.referencesNourse, Victoria F. 2021. Impeachments of Donald Trump: An Introduction to Constitutional Interpretation. New York: West Academic Publishing.pl
dc.referencesO’Connell Pearson, P. 2020. Conspiracy: Nixon, Watergate, and Democracy Defenders. New York: Simon & Schuster.pl
dc.referencesPareene, Alex. 2019. Making Impeachment Matter. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/155686/making-impeachment-matter-andrew-johnson-donald-trump (dostęp: 18.02.2022).pl
dc.referencesPastusiak, Longin. 1999. Prezydenci Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki Północnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Iskry.pl
dc.referencesPeterson, Christopher Louis. 2017. „Trump University and Presidential Impeachment”. Oregon Law Review 1: 59–121. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841306pl
dc.referencesPhilips, James Cleith. John C. Yoo. 2021. „You’re Fired: The Original Meaning of Presidential Impeachment”. Southern California Law Review 94(5): 1191–1278.pl
dc.referencesPiotrowski, Mateusz. 2022. Konsekwencje uniewinnienia Donalda Trumpa w procedurze impeachmentu. https://pism.pl/publikacje/Konsekwencje_uniewinnienia_Donalda_Trumpa_w_procedurze_impeachmentu (dostęp: 3.09.2022).pl
dc.referencesPodgor, Ellen S. 2021. „Obstruction of Justice: Redesigning the Shortcut”. Brigham Young University Law Review 46(3): 657–718.pl
dc.references„President Trump Impeached and Acquitted of Charges Relating to His Conduct of Foreign Affairs”. 2020. The American Journal of International Law 114(3): 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.40pl
dc.referencesRasmussen, Marcus E. 2020. Congressional Powers: Contempt, Subpoenas and Impeachment. New York: Snova.pl
dc.referencesRattey, Justin D. 2021. „Impartial Justice: Restoring Integrity to Impeachment Trials”. Pepperdine University School of Law 1: 1–47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3906351pl
dc.referencesRattinger, Alexandra. 2017. „The Impeachment Process of Brazil: A Comparative Look at Impeachment in Brazil and the United States”. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 1: 129–166.pl
dc.referencesRiggs, Fred W. 1999. „Impeachment vs. Harassment”. Public Administration Review 59(1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2307/977474pl
dc.referencesRoland, James. 2021. Impeachment: Donald Trump and History of Presidents in Peril. Minneapolis, MN: Lerner Publications.pl
dc.referencesRoman, Ediberto. Melissa Gonzales. Dianet Torres. 2018. „Collusion, Obstruction of Justice, and Impeachment”. Journal of Legislation 1: 9–59.pl
dc.referencesRoss, Edmund G. 2000. History of the Impeachment of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, by the House of Representatives, and His Trial by the Senate for High Crimes and Misdemeanors in Office, 1868. Washington: Project Gutenberg, Library of Congress.pl
dc.referencesShin, Gi-Wook. Renee J. Moon. 2017. „South Korea After Impeachment”. Journal of Democracy 28(4): 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0072pl
dc.referencesSilva, Carol L. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. Richard W. Waterman. 2007. „Why Did Clinton Survive the Impeachment Crisis? A Test of Three Explanations”. Presidential Studies Quarterly 37(3): 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02607.xpl
dc.referencesStarr, Kenneth. 2018. Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation. New York: Sentinel.pl
dc.referencesStewart, David D. 2009. Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln’s Legacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.pl
dc.referencesSumrall, Allen C. 2020. „The Law Incongruous Ideas of Impeachment: ‘Impeachable Offences’ and the Constitutional Order”. President Studies Quarterly 4: 948–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12681pl
dc.referencesSunstein, Cass R. 2017. Impeachment: A Citizens Guide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674984189pl
dc.referencesSzucs, Rebecca. 2014. „A Democracy’s ‘Poor Performance’: The Impeachment of Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo”. The George Washington International Law Review 46(2): 409–436.pl
dc.referencesTobbin, Jeffrey. 2020. True Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Investigation of Donald Trump. New York: Penguin Random House.pl
dc.referencesTrautman, Lawrence J. 2020. „Impeachment, Donald Trump and the Attempted Extortion of Ukraine”. Peace Law Review 2: 143–224. https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.2019pl
dc.referencesTribe, Laurence H. 2018. The End of Presidency: The Power of Impeachment. New York: Basic Books.pl
dc.referencesUschan, Michael V. 2010. Watergate. Detroit: Lucent Books.pl
dc.referencesWhittington, Keith E. 2020. „A Formidable Weapon of Faction? The Law and Politics of Impeachment”. Wake Forest Law Review 2: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3328981pl
dc.referencesWinneapple, Brenda. 2019. Impeachers: The Trial of Andrew Johnson and the Dream of a Just Nation. New York: Random House.pl
dc.referencesZeifman, Jerry M. 1995. Without Honor: Crimes of Camelot and the Impeachment of Richard Nixon. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailjerzy.jaskiernia@ujk.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6069.104.06
dc.relation.volume104


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0