Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorŚwieszczak, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-14T09:32:53Z
dc.date.available2026-10-14T09:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-30
dc.identifier.issn2391-6478
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/59474
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article. The aim of this publication is to analyze the importance of economic factors for assessing the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer among individual clients of the banking sector and the banking sector and the FinTech sector. The following hypothesis was put forward in the article: the average level of importance of economic factors for assessing the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer does not differ statistically significantly for individual customers of the banking sector and individual customers of the banking sector and the FinTech sector.Methodology. To verify the hypothesis and achieve the purpose of the study, 240 PAPI interviews were conducted among banking-sector customers. The sample comprised:120 individual banking-sector customers who had not yet used FinTech services.120 individual banking-sector customers with experience using FinTech services.The questionnaire survey was preceded by in-depth interviews with experts, academics researching FinTech, and owners and co-owners of FinTech businesses.Results of the research. The research found that individual banking-sector clients who had not yet used FinTech services were more likely to agree that higher monthly expenditure, creditworthiness, income, and savings were associated with a higher assessment of the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer. No statistically significant differences were found for the remaining statement. The results positively verify the hypothesis that the average importance of economic factors in assessing the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer does not differ significantly between banking-sector clients and clients using both banking and FinTech services.en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the article. The aim of this publication is to analyze the importance of economic factors for assessing the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer among individual clients of the banking sector and the banking sector and the FinTech sector. The following hypothesis was put forward in the article: the average level of importance of economic factors for assessing the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer does not differ statistically significantly for individual customers of the banking sector and individual customers of the banking sector and the FinTech sector.Methodology. To verify the hypothesis and achieve the purpose of the study, 240 PAPI interviews were conducted among banking-sector customers. The sample comprised:120 individual banking-sector customers who had not yet used FinTech services.120 individual banking-sector customers with experience using FinTech services.The questionnaire survey was preceded by in-depth interviews with experts, academics researching FinTech, and owners and co-owners of FinTech businesses.Results of the research. The research found that individual banking-sector clients who had not yet used FinTech services were more likely to agree that higher monthly expenditure, creditworthiness, income, and savings were associated with a higher assessment of the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer. No statistically significant differences were found for the remaining statement. The results positively verify the hypothesis that the average importance of economic factors in assessing the attractiveness of the FinTech sector’s offer does not differ significantly between banking-sector clients and clients using both banking and FinTech services.pl
dc.language.isopl
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Finance and Financial Law;51en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectbanken
dc.subjectfintechen
dc.subjectofferen
dc.subjectpurchasing decisionsen
dc.subjectattractiveness determinantsen
dc.titleCzynniki ekonomiczne jako determinanty atrakcyjności oferty sektora fintech dla klientów indywidualnych bankówpl
dc.title.alternativeEconomic factors as determinants of the attractiveness of the fintech sector’s offer for individual clients of banksen
dc.typeOther
dc.page.number187-210
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationFaculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodzpl
dc.identifier.eissn2353-5601
dc.referencesArend, R. J. (2024). Uncertainty in strategic decision making: Analysis, categorization, causation and resolution. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48553-4.pl
dc.referencesBaba, C., Batog, C., Flores, E., Gracia, B., Karpowicz, I., Kopyrski, P., Roaf, J., Shabunina, A., van Elkan, R., & Xu, X. C. (2020). Fintech in Europe: Promises and threats (IMF Working Paper No. 2020/241). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513561165.001.pl
dc.referencesBagchi, N. (2010). Management information systems. Vikas Publishing House.pl
dc.referencesBradley, R. (2018). Decision theory: A formal philosophical introduction. In S. O. Hansson & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), Introduction to formal philosophy (pp. 611–655). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_34.pl
dc.referencesBresnick, T., & Periu, O. (2022). Innovative decision-making techniques: A FOCCUSSED approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11280-5.pl
dc.referencesClements, R. (2021). Regulating FinTech in Canada and the United States: Comparison, challenges and opportunities. In K. T. Liaw (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of FinTech (pp. 416–460). Routledge.pl
dc.referencesChristiansen, B., & Lechman, E. (Eds.). (2016). Neuroeconomics and the decision-making process. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9989-2.pl
dc.referencesDeng, X., Huang, Z., & Cheng, X. (2019). FinTech and sustainable development: Evidence from China based on P2P data. Sustainability, 11(22), Article 6434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226434.pl
dc.referencesHarvey, T. R., Corkrum, S. M., Fox, S. L., Gustafson, D. C., & Keuilian, D. K. (2022). The practical decision maker: A handbook for decision making and problem solving. Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.5771/9781475863192.pl
dc.referencesHester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2017). Systemic decision making: Fundamentals for addressing problems and messes (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54672-8.pl
dc.referencesKaul, V. K. (2015). Principles and practices of management. Vikas Publishing.pl
dc.referencesKieżel, E. (Ed.). (2000). Rynkowe zachowania konsumentów. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego w Katowicach.pl
dc.referencesKorneta, P., & Lotko, A. (2021). Determinanty i modele zachowań konsumenta. Wnioski z przeglądu literatury. Marketing i Rynek, 28(9), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.33226/1231-7853.2021.9.1.pl
dc.referencesKozłowska, A. (2016). Cele reklamowe. Weryfikacja założeń. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zarządzanie, 43(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.12775/AUNC_ZARZ.2016.023.pl
dc.referencesKusińska, A. (Ed.). (2005). Rodziny ludzi młodych jako uczestnicy rynku: Diagnoza i typologia. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.pl
dc.referencesLiczmańska, K. (2015). Kluczowe czynniki determinujące zachowania konsumenckie na przykładzie mieszkańców województwa kujawsko-pomorskiego. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Problemy Zarządzania, Finansów i Marketingu, 41(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.18276/pzfm.2015.41/2-09.pl
dc.referencesNikoi, E., & Boateng, K. (Eds.). (2014). Collaborative communication processes and decision making in organizations. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4478-6.pl
dc.referencesStoner, J. A. F., Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R. (2001). Kierowanie (wyd. 2 zm.). Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.pl
dc.referencesŚwieszczak, K. (2023). Zaufanie społeczne a uwarunkowania psychologiczne atrakcyjności oferty sektora FinTech wśród klientów indywidualnych banków. Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny, 6(12), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.7172/2299-5749.IKAR.6.12.3.pl
dc.referencesWoś, J., Rachocka, J., & Kasperek-Hoppe, M. (2011). Zachowania konsumentów: Teoria i praktyka (wyd. 2 zm.). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.pl
dc.referencesYıldız, M. (2006). Decision-making models used in e-government projects: Evidence from Turkey. In G. Morçöl (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 395–416). Taylor & Francis.pl
dc.referencesZjawin, J. (2018). Zachowania zakupowe pokoleń konsumentów w świetle rozwoju technologii. Marketing i Zarządzanie, 53(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.18276/miz.2018.53-20.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailkrzysztof.swieszczak@uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/2391-6478.3.51.08
dc.relation.volume3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0