Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorPiotrowski, Andrzej
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-04T07:24:16Z
dc.date.available2015-06-04T07:24:16Z
dc.date.issued1985
dc.identifier.issn0208-600X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/9299
dc.description.abstractPersonality, according to the concept predominant in sociology for a long time, is a relatively stable and fixed - after an individual's maturation - set of socially learned habits, dispieitions and traits. It is, roughly speaking, a miniature replica of culture and social system's that reflects their order and anomies. This view of human being has been challenged by the modern sociology of interaction, by which it is meant hero a whole range of perspectives called the "interpretive sociology", i.e. Blumerian version of symbolic interactionism, Goffman*s dramaturgism, phenomenological sociology, ethnometbodology, and some other ideas derived from the former. In short, this approach proposes to conceive human being as a self endowed with intersubiectively valid cognitive-communicative-interpretative procedures and rules that enable the self to understand, project, negotiate and create the social order in situated and locally managed lines of interaction. Instead of the stable and fixed core of habits and traits that are to determine a person's behaviour, the stress is laid here on identity work and temporarily shared agreements that constitute a long term biographical organization of personal experience (self--conceptions based on meanings sedimented in memory) or short-term self-images. The present paper is aimed at a disscussion of developmental paths of these two orientations and their theoretical and philosophical background. They are argued to be distinct and at most points incompatible forms of discourse based on different models of society, action and individual - society relation. Against the view that the interpretive conception of social actor is sociologically defective and limited, the author of the paper argues for its sociological relevance and attractiveness. He points out that in this orientation it is essentially possible to approach personal experiences in their social-cultural orderliness, and to avoid at the same time a structural reductionism that is present in the sociological determinism of the traditional concept of personality.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipZadanie pt. „Digitalizacja i udostępnienie w Cyfrowym Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego kolekcji czasopism naukowych wydawanych przez Uniwersytet Łódzki” nr 885/P-DUN/2014 dofinansowane zostało ze środków MNiSW w ramach działalności upowszechniającej naukę.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica;12
dc.titleOsobowość a tożsamość. 0 pewnej tendencji we współczesnej socjologii interakcjipl_PL
dc.title.alternativePersonality and Identity Notes on a tendency in Modern Sociology of Interactionpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number19-44pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationZakład Socjologii Kultury, Uniwersytet Łódzkipl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord