Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorTulejski, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T11:38:33Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T11:38:33Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0208-6069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/11783
dc.description.abstractDavid Hume offers a well conceived plan for the formation of government and its political workings. Furthermore, he grants that in special circumstances the citizens of a particular government may revolt, but rejects both tory theory of passive disobedience and whig’s justification of revolution. In this article, the Author argues, that with respect to obedience and disloyalty, Hume gives no formal rules for revolution. Unjustified revolutions are denoted by lack of adherence to established practices and want of a genuine cause. They are, rather, motivated by speculative factions subject to fanaticism and enthusiasm which are the foundations of Hume’s political worries. Author concludes that the Hume expressed suspicion of attempts to radical changes of society. His political scepticism, social theory and the rejection of revolution qualified him as conservative thinker.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica;69
dc.titlePomiędzy wigami i torysami. Prawo oporu w doktrynie politycznej Davida Hume’apl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2009pl_PL
dc.page.number[81]-98pl_PL
dc.referencesSzczech Tomasz. 2006. Państwo i prawo w doktrynie św. Augustyna, Marcina Lutra i Jana Kalwina. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
dc.referencesSkinner Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 2: The Age of Reformation, 193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesKnox John. 1841. W History of the Reformation in Scotland, 203 - 205. Londyn: Blackie & Son.
dc.referencesMorgan Edmund S. 2003. Introduction. W Puritan Political Ideas. 1558–1794. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
dc.references(Burgess Glenn, Festenstein Matthew, Alford Stephen. 2007. A Politics of Emergency in the Reign of Elizabeth I. W English Radicalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesFilmer Robert. 1949. Directions for Obedience to Government in Dangerous or Doubtful Times. W Patriarcha and Other Political Works, Basil Blackwell, red. Laslett Peter. 232. Oxford.
dc.referencesRau Zbigniew. 1992. W Wstęp. W Dwa traktaty o rządzie, Locke John, xcv–xcix. Warszawa: PWN.
dc.referencesMacaulay Thomas Babington. 1873. W Dzieje Anglii od wstąpienia na tron Jakuba II, t. V, 8-9. Warszawa: Gebethner i Wolff.
dc.referencesWorden B., Izrael J. I. 1991. The Revolution of 1688–89 and the English republican tradition. W The Anglo-Dutch Moment. Essays on the Glorious Revolution and its World Impact, 266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesSim Stuart., Walker David. 2003. W The Discourse of Sovereingty, Hobbes to Fielding, 166. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
dc.referencesHolmes Geoffrey. 1986. W chapt. 6: Harley, St. John and the Death of Tory Party. W Politics Religion and Society in England, 1679–1742. London: Hambledon Press.
dc.referencesHume David. 1875. W Of the Origin of Government. W Essays, Literary, Moral and Political, 28. London: Ward, Lock&Co.
dc.referencesHume David. 1975. W Badania dotyczące zasad moralności. Warszawa: PWN.
dc.referencesWarner Stuart, Livingston Donald. 1994. David Hume: Political Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
dc.referencesBaier Annette. 1991. W Progress and Sentiment: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
dc.referencesJenkinson Sally. 2007. Bayle and Hume on Monarchy, Scepticism, and Forms of Government. W Monarchism in the Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Common Good, red. Blom Hans, Laursen John Christian, Simonutti Luisa. 70. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
dc.referencesCapaldi N., Livingston D.W. 1990. Hume’s Historical Conception of Liberty. W Liberty in Hume’s History of England. Dordrecht: Springer.
dc.referencesMuller Jerry. 1997. Conservatism: An Anthology of Social nad Political Thought from Hume to the Present, 11. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.referencesCastiglione Dario. 1994. W History, reason and experience: Hume’s arguments against contract theories. W The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls,red. Boucher David. 103. London: Routledge.
dc.referencesRahe Paul, Danford J. W. 2006. Getting Our Bearings. Machiavelli and Hume. W Machiavelli’s Liberal Republican Legacy, 109. New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesBotwinick Aryeh. 1977. “The Case for Hume’a Non-Utilitarianism”. Journal of the History of Philosophy (1977/15):. 423–435.
dc.referencesMarshall John. 1994. John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesDunn John. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke. An Historical Account of the Argument of the Two Treatise of Government, 165–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesDees R. H. 1992. “Hume and the Context of Politics”. Journal of History of Philosophy (1992/30): 223.
dc.referencesSpeck W. A. 1988. The Reluctant Revolutionaries. Englishmen and the Revolution of 1688. Oxford: Oxford University Press
dc.referencesSkinner Quentin, Phillipson Nicholas. 1993. Propriety, Property and Prudence: David Hume and the Defence of Revolution. W Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, 316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.referencesBoucher David, Kelly Paul. 1998. David Hume, Contractarian. W Social Justice: From Hume to Walzer, Routledge, 18. London: Routledge.
dc.referencesMcArthur Neil. 2007. David Hume’s Political Theory: Law, Commerce and the Constitution of Government, 39. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
dc.referencesMiller David. 1981. Philosophy and Ideology in Hume’s Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord