Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrzesiuk, Kalina
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-30T12:18:29Z
dc.date.available2017-03-30T12:18:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21060
dc.description.abstractOne of the distinctive features of contemporary organisations is their interconnectedness. Relationships between companies are usually analysed on the basis of social network relationships between them. The research question this article aims to answer concerns the influence of being part of an interorganisational network on the occurrence and consequences of unethical behaviour.This paper covers three main areas of research regarding this topic. Firstly, the role networks play in the initiation, evolution, and consequences of wrongdoings. The main problem taken into consideration in this part of the article is identifying network factors which increase and mitigate the propensity of organisations to deceive their partners. Two main types of such determinants include relational and structural factors. The first group usually involves features such as the strength of ties, the symmetry/asymmetry of ties, and the status of partners. The latter includes such variables as structural holes, centrality, density and the cohesiveness of the network. The second area covered in this article concerns how misconduct behaviours spread throughout the network of interorganisational ties. This phenomenon might resemble a social or emotional contagion occurring in social networks. The effects of unethical acts on the network are the main interest of the third part of this paper. Usually, the consequences of wrongdoing by one of the interconnected partners include a change in the quality of the related partners, modifications in the structure of the network, and an alteration of its prominence and cohesion. In conclusion, there are some suggestions for lines of inquiry in the area of unethical behaviour from the social network perspective in the future.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.subjectunethical behavioursen_GB
dc.subjectnetworken_GB
dc.subjectinterorganisational relationshipsen_GB
dc.subjectsocial networksen_GB
dc.titleUnethical Behaviour of Organisations from a Social Network Perspective. A Literature Reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016en_GB
dc.page.number[23]-37
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationJohn Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Faculty of Social Sciences
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4896
dc.referencesAdler P.S., S. Kwon, Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept, “The Academy of Management Review” 2002, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 17–40, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR. 2002.5922314.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlexander C.R., On the Nature of the Reputational Penalty for Corporate Crime: Evidence, “The Journal of Law Economics” 1999, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 489–526, http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/467433.pl_PL
dc.referencesAshforth B.E, V. Anand, The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations, “Research in Organizational Behavior” 2003, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 1–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesAshforth B.E., D.A. Gioia, S.L. Robinson, L.K. Treviño, Re-Viewing Organizational Corruption, “Academy of Management Review” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 670–684, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159430.pl_PL
dc.referencesAshkanasy N.M., C.A. Windsor, L.K. Treviño, Bad Apples in Bad Barrels Revisited: Cognitive Moral Development, Just World Beliefs, Rewards, and Ethical Decision-Making, “Business Ethics Quarterly” 2006, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 449–473, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200616447.pl_PL
dc.referencesBrass D.J., K.D. Butterfield, B.C. Skaggs, Relationships and Unethical Behavior – A Social Network Perspective, “Academy of Management Review” 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 14–31, http://doi.org/10.2307/259097.pl_PL
dc.referencesBriscoe F., S. Safford, The Nixon-In-China Effect: Activism, Imitation, and the Institutionalization of Contentious Practices, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2008, Vol. 53, pp. 460–491, http://dx.doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.460.pl_PL
dc.referencesBurt R.S., Structural Holes, Harvard University Press, Harvard 1995.pl_PL
dc.referencesCollins J.D., K. Uhlenbruck, P. Rodriguez, Why Firms Engage in Corruption: A Top Management Perspective, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2009, Vol. 87, No. 1, p. 89–108, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3.pl_PL
dc.referencesCoyle-Shapiro J.A.M., Shore L.M., The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here?, “Human Resource Management Review” 2007, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 166–179.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavis G.F., H.R. Greve, Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s, “American Journal of Sociology” 1997, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 1–37, http://doi.org/10.1086/231170.pl_PL
dc.referencesDrover W., M.S. Wood, Y. Fassin, Take the Money or Run? Investors’ Ethical Reputation and Entrepreneurs’ Willingness to Partner, “Journal of Business Venturing” 2014, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 723–740, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.004.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoffman E., Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Simon and Schuster, New York 1963.pl_PL
dc.referencesGranovetter M., Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, “American Journal of Sociology” 1985, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481–510, http://doi.org/10.1086/228311.pl_PL
dc.referencesGranovetter M., The Strength of Weak Ties, “American Journal of Sociology” 1973, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1360–1380, http://doi.org/10.1086/225469.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreve H.R., D. Palmer, J. Pozner, Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct, “The Academy of Management Annals” 2010, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 53–107, http://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654186.pl_PL
dc.referencesGulati R., M. Sytch, Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer’s Performance in Procurement Relationships, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2007, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 32–69, http://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.32.pl_PL
dc.referencesHarris J., P. Bromiley, Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation, “Organization Science” 2007, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 350–367, http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0241.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaunschild P.R., A.S. Miner, Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1997, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 472–500, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393735pl_PL
dc.referencesJensen M., Should We Stay or Should We Go? Status Accountability Anxiety and Client Defections, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2006, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 97–128, http:// doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.1.97.pl_PL
dc.referencesJonsson S., H.R. Greve, T. Fujiwara-Greve, Undeserved Loss: The Spread of Legitimacy Loss to Innocent Organizations in Response to Reported Corporate Deviance, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2009, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 195–228, http://doi.org/10. 2189/ asqu.2009.54.2.195.pl_PL
dc.referencesKarpoff J.M., D.S. Lee, V.P. Vendrzyk, Defense Procurement Fraud, Penalties, and Contractor Influence, “The Journal of Political Economy” 1999, Vol. 107, pp. 809–842, http://doi.org/10.3386/w19846.pl_PL
dc.referencesKulik B.W., Agency Theory, Reasoning And Culture at Enron: In Search of a Solution, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2005, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 347–360, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 /s10551-004-7308-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcPherson M., L. Smith-Lovin, J.M. Cook, Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks, “Annual Review of Sociology” 2001, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 415–444, http://doi. org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.pl_PL
dc.referencesMelé D., The Practice of Networking: An Ethical Approach, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2009, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 487–503, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0602-2.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore D.A., P.E. Tetlock, L. Tanlu, M.H. Bazerman, Conflicts of Interest and the Case of Auditor Independence: Moral Seduction and Strategic Issue Cycling, “Academy of Management Review” 2006, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 10–29, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379621.pl_PL
dc.referencesPalmer D., C. Moore, Social Networks and Organizational Wrongdoing in Context [in:] Organizational Wrongdoing, eds. D. Palmer, R. Greenwood, K. Smoth-Crowe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2016, pp. 153–170.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinto, J. C.R. Leana, F.K. Pil, Corrupt or Organizations of Corrupt Individuals? Two Types of Organization-Level Corruption, “Academy of Management Review” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 685–709, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465726.pl_PL
dc.referencesProvan K.G., A. Fish, J. Sydow, Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks, “Journal of Management” 2007, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 479–516, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302554.pl_PL
dc.referencesProvan K.G., J.G. Sebastian, Networks Within Networks: Service Link Overlap, Organizational Cliques, and Network Effectiveness, “Academy of Management Journal” 1998, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 453–463, http://doi.org/10.2307/257084.pl_PL
dc.referencesRhee M., P.R. Haunschild, The Liability of Good Reputation: A Study of Product Recalls in the U.S. Automobile Industry, “Organization Science” 2006, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 101–117, http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0175.pl_PL
dc.referencesRogers E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York 1995.pl_PL
dc.referencesRowley T.J., H.R. Greve, H. Rao, J.A. Baum, A.V. Shipilov, Time to Break Up: Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques, “The Academy of Management Journal” 2005, Vol. 48, No. 3, p. 499–520, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ AMJ.2005.17407914.pl_PL
dc.referencesSeevers M.T., S.J. Skinner, S.W. Kelley, A Social Network Perspective on Sales Force Ethics, “Journal of Personal Selling Sales Force Management” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 231–251, http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134270405.pl_PL
dc.referencesSuchman M.C., Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, “Academy of Management Review” 1995, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 571–610, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.pl_PL
dc.referencesSullivan B.N., P. Haunschild, K. Page, Organizations Non Gratae? The Impact of Unethical Corporate Acts on Interorganisational Networks, “Organization Science” 2007, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 55–70, http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0229.pl_PL
dc.referencesSykes G.M., D. Matza, Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency, “American Sociological Review” 1957, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 664–670, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 2089195.pl_PL
dc.referencesTenbrunsel A.E., K. Smith‐Crowe, Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going, “The Academy of Management Annals” 2008, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 545–607, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211677.pl_PL
dc.referencesUzzi B., Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 1997, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 35–66, http:// doi.org/10.2307/2393808.pl_PL
dc.referencesWestphal J., P. Khanna, Keeping Directors in Line: Social Distancing as a Control Mechanism in the Corporate Elite, “Administrative Science Quarterly” 2003, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 361–398, http://doi.org/10.2307/3556678.pl_PL
dc.referencesWiesenfeld B.M., K.A. Wurthmann, D.C. Hambrick, The Stigmatization and Devaluation of Elites Associated with Corporate Failures: A Process Model, “Academy of Management Review” 2008, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 231–251, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR. 2008.27752771.pl_PL
dc.referencesZuber F., Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective, “Journal of Business Ethics” 2015, Vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 151–172, http://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-014-2270-0.pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.19.4.02
dc.relation.volume19en_GB
dc.subject.jelM10
dc.subject.jelM14
dc.subject.jelZ13


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record