Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorDeptuła, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T11:56:42Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T11:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1508-1117
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21184
dc.description.abstractThis article is based on review of the most important, traditional as well as the most recent, trends in studies of urban morphology. It provides a comparative synthesis of the major European schools of urban morphology, developed in the field of geography and architecture. For this purpose, it traces the development of morphological studies derived from three distinct traditions: German, British and Italian, and compare them with modern techniques of analysis of urban spatial forms, with particular emphasis on space syntax. Through the presentation of different theoretical and methodological approaches to urban structures the article aims to demonstrate the differences in the focus of morphological studies conducted in different areas of research. At the same time it accentuate their complementary potential.en_GB
dc.description.abstractArtykuł jest próbą syntezy i usystematyzowania dotychczasowego dorobku w dziedzinie urbomorfologii. Opiera się na przeglądzie najważniejszych, tradycyjnych oraz najbardziej aktualnych tendencji w badaniach prowadzonych na tym polu. W pracy dokonano charakterystyki i porównania najważniejszych szkół europejskich zorientowanych na problematykę morfologii miast, wypracowanych na gruncie geografii i architektury. W tym celu prześledzono rozwój badań morfologicznych wywodzących się z trzech odmiennych tradycji: niemieckiej, brytyjskiej i włoskiej oraz zestawiono je z nowoczesnymi technikami analizy miejskich form przestrzennych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem space syntax (metody syntatyki przestrzeni). Artykuł ma na celu wskazać różnice w punkcie ciężkości badań morfologicznych prowadzonych w różnych obszarach badawczych, jednocześnie zaakcentować ich komplementarny potencjał poprzez prezentację różnych podejść teoretycznych i metodologicznych do struktur miejskich.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica; 25
dc.subjectUrban morphologyen_GB
dc.subjecthistorical geographyen_GB
dc.subjectarchitectureen_GB
dc.subjectphilosophyen_GB
dc.subjectspace syntaxen_GB
dc.subjectMorfologia miastpl_PL
dc.subjectgeografia historycznapl_PL
dc.subjectarchitekturapl_PL
dc.subjectfilozofiapl_PL
dc.subjectspace syntaxpl_PL
dc.titleTradycyjne szkoły urbomorfologii a nowe podejścia do analizy miejskich form przestrzennychpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeTraditional schools of urban morphology and the new approaches to the analysis of urban formsen_GB
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016pl_PL
dc.page.number[25]-38
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Łódzki, Wydział Nauk Geograficznych, Katedra Geografii Politycznej i Studiów Regionalnych
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4826
dc.referencesBaker N.T., Slater T.R., 1992, Morphological regions in British medieval towns, [in:] Whitehand J.W.R., Larkham P.J. (eds), Urban landscapes: international perspectives, Routledge, London, s. 43–68.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerghauster Pont M., Haupt P., 2010, Spacematrix: space, density and urban form, Nether­lands Architecture Institute, Amsterdam.pl_PL
dc.referencesBobek H., 1927, Grundfragen der Stadtgeographie, „Geographischer Anzeiger”, 28 (7), s. 213–24.pl_PL
dc.referencesBollati R., 1980, Metodo di lettura delle strutture urbane, attraverso le fasi evolutive, Istituto Universitario Statale di Architettura, Reggio Calabria.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaniggia G., 1963, Lettura di una città: Como, Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica, Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaniggia G., Maffei G.L., 1978, Lettura dell’edilizia di base, Marsilio Editori, Padova.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaniggia G., Maffei G.L., 1979, Compositione architettonica e tipologia edilizia. I Lettu­ra dell’edilizia di base, Marsilio, Venezia.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaniggia G., Maffei G.L., 1981, Strutture dello spazioantropico, Alinea, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesCaniggia G., Maffei G.L., 2001, Architectural composition and building typology: inter­preting basic building, Alinea, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesCataldi G., 2003, From Muratori to Caniggia: the origins and development of the Italian school of design typology, „Urban Morphology” 7 (1), s. 19–34.pl_PL
dc.referencesCataldi G., Maffei G.L., Vaccaro P., 2002, Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology, „Urban Morphology”, 6 (1), s. 3–14.pl_PL
dc.referencesCho H., 2011, Future Korean Urban Transformation as the result of Integration of Urban Administrative Districts, The Asian Conference on Asian Studies 2011, Conference Proceedings, International Academic Forum, s. 117–131.pl_PL
dc.referencesCiołkosz-Styk A., 2013, Zastosowanie metody cyfrowego przetwarzania obrazów do wyznaczania gęstości graficznej opracowań kartograficznych na przykładzie planów miast, „Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji”, 25, s. 55–66.pl_PL
dc.referencesControy-Dalton R., Dalton N., 2007, Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs, (Proceedings) Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium.pl_PL
dc.referencesConzen M.P., 2010, The elusive common denominator in understanding urban form, „Ur­ban Morphology”, 14, s. 55–58.pl_PL
dc.referencesConzen M.R.G., 1960, Alnwick, Northumberland; a Study in Town-Plan Analysis, Publi­cation 27, Institute of British Geographers, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesConzen M.R.G., 1962, The plan analysis of an English city centre, [in:] Norborg K. (eds.), Proceedings of the IGU Symposium in Urban Geography, Gleerup, Lund, s. 383–414.pl_PL
dc.referencesConzen M.R.G., 1968, The use of towns plans in the study of urban history, [in:] Doys H.J. (eds.), The study of urban history, London, s. 113–130.pl_PL
dc.referencesDara-Abrams D., 2009, Extracting Cognitively Relevant Measures from Environmental Models, [in:] Koch D., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syn­tax Symposium, Stockholm.pl_PL
dc.referencesDörries H., 1925, Die Städte im oberen Leinetal, Göttingen, Northeim und Einbeck. Ein Beitrag zur Landeskunde Niedersachsens und zur Methodik der Stadtgeographie, Vandenhoeck Ruprecht, Göttingen.pl_PL
dc.referencesGeisler W., 1924, Die deutsche Stadt. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Kulturlandschaft, „Forschungen zur deutschen Landes und Volkskunde”,22 (5), Engelhorn, Stuttgart.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiannini A., 1980, L’individuo territoriale, Istituto di Progettazione Architettonica, Genova.pl_PL
dc.referencesGil J., Beirão J.N., Montenegro N., Duarte J., 2012, On the discovery of urban typologies: data mining the many dimensions of urban form, „Urban Morphology”, 16, s. 27–40.pl_PL
dc.referencesGiovannoni G., 1930, Vecchie citta ed edilizia nuova, Unione Tipografico-Editrice Tori­nese, Torino.pl_PL
dc.referencesGriffiths S., 2009, Persistence and Change in the Spatio-temporal Description of Sheffield Parish 1770–1910, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Techno­logy, 37, s. 1–15.pl_PL
dc.referencesGriffiths S., 2012, The use of Space Syntax in Historical Research: current practice and future possibilities, [in:] Greene M., Reyes J., Castro A. (eds.), Proceedings: Eight International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile.pl_PL
dc.referencesGriffiths S., Jones C., Vaughan L., Haklay M., 2010, The persistence of suburban cen­tres in Greater London: combining Conzenian and space syntax approaches, „Urban Morphology”, 14 (2), s. 85–99.pl_PL
dc.referencesHanna S., 2009, Spectral comparison of large urban graphs, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stock­holm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 39, s. 1–11.pl_PL
dc.referencesHassinger H., 1916, Kulturhistorischer Atlas der K.K. Reichshaupt- und Residenzstadt Wien, und Verzeichnis der erhaltenswerten historischen Kunst- und Naturdenkmale des Wiener Stadtbildes, „Österreichische Kunsttopographie”, 15, Schroll, Wien.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeineberg H., 2007, German geographical urban morphology in an international and interdisciplinary framework, „Urban Morphology”, 11 (1), s. 5–24.pl_PL
dc.referencesHillier B., 1996, Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture, Cambrid­ge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHillier B., 1999, Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in defor­med grids, „Urban Design International”, 4 (3–4), s. 107–127.pl_PL
dc.referencesHillier B., Hanson J., 1984, The social logic of space, Cambridge University Press, Camb­ridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHillier B., Hanson J., Graham H., 1987, Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes, „Environment and Planning B”, 14, s. 363–385.pl_PL
dc.referencesHoek J. van den, 2009, The Mixed-use Index as planning tool for new towns in the 21st Century, [in:] Stolk E., Brömmelstroet M.T. (eds.), New towns for the 21st century: the planned vs the unplanned city, SUN Architecture, Amsterdam, s. 198–207.pl_PL
dc.referencesJiang B., Claramunt C., Klarqvist B., 2000, Integration of space syntax into GIS for mo­deling urban space, „International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoin­formation”, 2, s. 161–171.pl_PL
dc.referencesJiang B., Claramunt C., 2002, Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology, „Transactions in GIS”, 6 (3), s. 295.pl_PL
dc.referencesKarimi K., 2000, Urban conservation and spatial transformation: preserving the frag­ments or maintaining the ‘spatial spirit’, „Urban Design International”, 5, s. 221–231.pl_PL
dc.referencesKigawa T., Furuyama M., 2005, Kyoto: A morphological cycle between a city of rituals and a city of games, Proceedings 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, s. 697–713.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoter M., Kulesza M., 2007, Morfologia miast – stan i tendencje rozwoju, [w:] Jażdżew­ska I. (red.), Polska geografia osadnictwa. Dotychczasowy dorobek. Program badań, XX Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście, Katedra Geografii Miast i Turyzmu UŁ, Łódź, s. 303–314.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoter M., Kulesza M., 2008, Zastosowanie metod conzenowskich w polskich badaniach morfologii miast, [w:] Kulesza M. (red.), Czas i przestrzeń w naukach geograficznych. Wybrane problemy geografii historycznej, UŁ, Łódź, s. 257–272.pl_PL
dc.referencesLarkham P.J., 1996, Conservation and the city, Routledge, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesLetesson, Q., 2010, Du phénotype au génotype: Analyse de la syntaxe spatiale en architec­ture minoenne, Published PhD thesis, University of Louvain Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLilley K.D., 1999, Urban landscapes and the cultural politics of territorial control in Anglo-Norman England, „Landscapes Research”, 24, s. 5–23.pl_PL
dc.referencesLilley K.D., 2000, Mapping the medieval city: plan analysis and urban history, „Urban History”, 27, s. 5–30.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarcus L., 2010, Spatial capital and how to measure it: a proposal for an extension of space syntax into a more general urban morphology, „Journal of Space Syntax”, 1, s. 30–40.pl_PL
dc.referencesMaretto M., 1980, Realtà naturale e realtà della costruita, Uniedit, Firenze.pl_PL
dc.referencesMaretto M., 2013, Severio Muratori: towards a morphological school of urban design, „Urban Morphology”, 17 (2), s. 93–106.pl_PL
dc.referencesMartiny R., 1928, Die Grundrißgestaltung der deutsche Siedlungen, Petermanns Mitte­ilungen, „Ergänzungsheft”, 197, Perthes, Gotha.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarzot N., 2002, The study of urban form in Italy, „Urban Morphology”, 6 (2), s. 59–73.pl_PL
dc.referencesMedeiros V., Holanda F., Trigueiro E., 2003, From Compact Colonial Villages to Sparse Metropolis, Proceedings, 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, UCL, London, s. 12.1–12.16.pl_PL
dc.referencesMedeiros V., Holanda F., 2007, Structure and size: Brazilian cities in an urban configura­tional world scenario, Proceedings 6th International Space Syntax Symposium Istan­bul, Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Architecture, 029.01–12.pl_PL
dc.referencesMuratori S., 1950, I caratteri degli edifici nello studio dell’architettura, Instituto Univer­sitario di Architettura, Venezia.pl_PL
dc.referencesMuratori S., 1960, Studi per una operante storia urbana di Venezia, Instituto poligrafico dello Stato, Libreria dello Stato.pl_PL
dc.referencesMuratori S., 1978, Metodologia del sistema realtà-autocoscienza, Centro Studi di Storia Urbanistica, Roma.pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Sullivan D., 2000, Graph-based cellular automation models of urban spatial processes, University College London, University of London, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesOliveira V., 2013a, The study of urban form: reflections on national reviews, „Urban Morphology”, 17 (2), s. 85–92.pl_PL
dc.referencesOliveira V., 2013b, Morpho: a methodology for assessing urban form, „Urban Morpho­logy”, 14, s. 5–20.pl_PL
dc.referencesOsmond P., 2010, The urban structural unit: towards a descriptive framework to support urban analysis and planning, „Urban Morphology”, 14, s. 5–20.pl_PL
dc.referencesPagano G., Daniel G., 1936, Architettura rurale italiana, Ulrico Hoepli Editore, Milano.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinho P., Oliveira V., 2009a, Combining different methodological approaches to analyze the Oporto Metropolitan Area, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 88, s. 1–13.pl_PL
dc.referencesPinho P., Oliveira V., 2009b, Cartographic analysis in urban morphology, „Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design”, 36, s. 107–127.pl_PL
dc.referencesRatzel F., 1903, Die geographische Lage der großen Städte Großstadt, „Jahrbuch der Gehe-Stiftung”, 9, v. Zahn Jaensch, Dresden.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchlüter O., 1899a, Bemerkungen zur Siedlungsgeographie, „Geographische Zeitschrift”, 5, s. 65–84.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchlüter O., 1899b, Über den Grundriß der Städte, „Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erd­kunde zu Berlin”, 34, s. 446–462.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchöller P., 1953, Aufgaben und Probleme der Stadtgeographie, „Erdkunde”, 7 (3), s. 161–184.pl_PL
dc.referencesSerra M., Pinho P., 2011, Dynamics of periurban spatial structures: investigating diffe­rentiated patterns of change on Oporto’s urban fringe, „Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design”, 38, s. 359–382.pl_PL
dc.referencesShpuza E., 2009, Evolution of Street Networks in Adriatic and Ionian Coastal Cities 1769–2007, [in:] Koch D., Marcus L., Steen J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Internatio­nal Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 101, s. 1–15.pl_PL
dc.referencesSlater T.R., 1987, Ideal and reality in English episcopal medieval town planning, Tran­sactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 12, s. 191–203.pl_PL
dc.referencesStanilov K., 2010, Brigding the gap between urban morphology and urban modeling, „Urban Morphology”, 14, s. 123–124.pl_PL
dc.referencesStåhle A., 2012, Place Syntax Tool (PST), [in:] Hull A., Silva C., Bertolini L. (eds.), Ac­cessibility Instruments for Planning Practice, COST Office, s. 173–178.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzmytkie R., 2009, Miasta-zlepieńce na Śląsku Dolnym i Opolskim, Rozprawy Naukowe Instytutu Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 6, Uni­wersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław.pl_PL
dc.referencesSzmytkie R., 2014, Metody analizy morfologii i fizjonomii jednostek osadniczych, Roz­prawy Naukowe Instytutu Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego, 35, Uniwersytet Wroc­ławski, Wrocław.pl_PL
dc.referencesThaler U., 2005, Narrative and Syntax: new perspectives on the Late Bronze Age palace of Pylos, Greece, Proceedings 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture, s. 324–339.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand J.W.R., 1967, Fringe belts: a neglected aspect of urban geography, „Tran­sactions”, 41, Institute of British Geographers, s. 223–233.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand J.W.R., 1972, Building cycles and the spatial pattern of urban growth, „Tran­sactions”, 56, Institute of British Geographers, s. 39–55.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand J.W.R., 1981, Conzenian ideas: extention and development, [in:] Whitehand J.W.R. (eds.), The urban landscape: historical development and management, Papers by M.R.G. Conzen, Institute of British Geographers. Special Publication, 13, Acade­mic Press, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand, J.W.R., 1988, Urban fringe belts: development of an idea, „Planning Perspec­tives”, 3, s. 47–58.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand J.W.R., 1992, The making of the Urban landscape, Institute of British Geo­graphers, Special Publication, 26, Blackwell, Oxford.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand J.W.R., 1994, Development cycles and urban landscapes, „Geography”, 79, s. 3–17.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhitehand J.W.R., 2003, Suburban residential building form: a historio-geographical approach, [in:] Bischoff C.A., Krajewski C. (eds.), Beiträge zur geographischen Stadt- und Regionalforschung, 46, Institut für Geographie, Münster, s. 165–174.pl_PL
dc.referencesYe Y., Nes van A., 2014, Quantitative tools in urban morphology: combining space syn­tax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in GIS framework, „Urban Morphology”, 18 (2), s. 98–118.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailmagbar81@wp.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1508-1117.25.02


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord