Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDobrosz-Michiewicz, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorWładyka-Łuczak, Zofia
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-08T15:01:00Z
dc.date.available2018-02-08T15:01:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1505-9057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24035
dc.description.abstractThe article presents the results of an empirical experimental study into the functional aspects of polysemous communication in politics. The analyses of the results have led to the following conclusions in terms of the functional limitations of the application of polysemy in communication (from the point of view of the evaluation of a sender of a polysemous message): a message with a stronger polysemous markedness generated a higher agreement with the sender among respondents,the sender of a more polysemous message was evaluated as more credible, the level of polysemous markedness of a message was irrelevant for the evaluation of the competences of its sender, both for the evaluation of the agreement with the sender, and her/his credibility and competences, the level of the receivers’ awareness in terms of the message’s polysemy was irrelevant; however, the influence of credibility and the evaluation of competences on the agreement with the sender was significant.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article was developed within a research project financed by the subsidy for young scientists in 2016.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica; 5; 5
dc.subjectcognitive polysemyen_GB
dc.subjectlimitations of polysemous communicationen_GB
dc.subjectcommunication in politicsen_GB
dc.subjectpolysemy and sender’s credibilityen_GB
dc.subjectpolysemy and sender’s competencesen_GB
dc.titleThe sender-receiver relationship as moderator of the persuasive effect in polysemic communicationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017en_GB
dc.page.number[147]-156
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationChair of Journalism and Social Communication, Faculty of Philology, University of Lodz
dc.identifier.eissn2353-1908
dc.referencesCamden C., Moltey M.T., Wilson A., “White lies in interpersonal communication: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 1984, Issue 48 (4), pp. 309–325.en_GB
dc.referencesDobrosz-Michiewicz K., “Struktura wieloznaczności poznawczej (na podstawie komunikowania w polityce)”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 2016, Issue 2 (32), pp. 187–205.en_GB
dc.referencesDobrosz-Michiewicz K., “Wieloznaczność poznawcza jako strategia komunikacyjna”, Acta Universitatis Lodzensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica, 2017 [in press].en_GB
dc.referencesDobrosz-Michiewicz K., “Dialogowość komunikatów perswazyjnych”, in: “Badanie i projektowanie komunikacji 3”, M. Wszołek (ed.), Wydawnictwo Libron, Wroclaw 2014.en_GB
dc.referencesLakoff G., Johnson M., “Metafory w naszym życiu” [Methaphors We Live By], transl. by P. Krzeszowski, Warsaw 1988.en_GB
dc.referencesLangacker R.W., “Wykłady z gramatyki kognitywnej”, H. Kardela, P. Łozowski (eds.), transl. By A. Głaz, K. Wengorek-Dolecka, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 2005.en_GB
dc.referencesTabakowska E., “Gramatyka i obrazowanie. Wprowadzenie do językoznawstwa kognitywnego”, Polska Akademia Nauk, Warsaw 1995.en_GB
dc.referencesTaylor J.R., “Kategoryzacja w języku. Prototypy w teorii językoznawczej”, transl. by A. Skucińska, Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych Universitas, Cracow 2001.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailkarolina.dobrosz@uni.lodz.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailzet-zet@zet-zet.com.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1505-9057.43.10
dc.relation.volume43en_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record