Corporate social responsibility in the light of Kant’s categorical imperative

Tapek, Krzysztof

dc.contributor.author	Tapek, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned	2019-04-03T09:05:18Z
dc.date.available	2019-04-03T09:05:18Z
dc.date.issued	2018
dc.identifier.issn	1899-2226
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/27326
dc.description.abstract	Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, especially his categorical imperative, is one of several ethical theories mainly used to morally legitimize actions, referred to as Corporate Social Responsibility. The aim of the current article is to evaluate if Kant’s philosophy can be used as the ethical foundation for Corporate Social Responsibility as well as to present its advantages and disadvantages in a theoretical and practical approach.	en_GB
dc.description.sponsorship	Publication of English-language versions of the volumes of the "Annales. Ethics in Economic Life" financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship.	en_GB
dc.language.iso	en	en_GB
dc.publisher	Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego	en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Annales. Ethics in Economic Life; 7
dc.rights	This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.	en_GB
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0	en_GB
dc.subject	categorical imperative	en_GB
dc.subject	Immanuel Kant	en_GB
dc.subject	Corporate Social Responsibility	en_GB
dc.subject	business ethics	en_GB
dc.title	Corporate social responsibility in the light of Kant’s categorical imperative	en_GB
dc.type	Article	en_GB
dc.page.number	85-96
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Jagiellonian University, Chair of Economic Policy on Department of Law and Administration
dc.identifier.eissn	2353-4869
dc.references	Albert, E., Denise, T., & Peterfreund, S. (1980). Great traditions in ethics. New York: Van Nostrand.	en_GB
dc.references	Bauder, M. (2013). Master of the universe [original title: Der Banker: Master of the Universe]. 3sat/ARTE, Bauderfilm, Hessischer Rundfunk, Germany-Austria.	en_GB
dc.references	Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.	en_GB
dc.references	Chryssides, G., & Kaler, J. (1999). Wprowadzenie do etyki biznesu [An Introduction to Business Ethics] (H. Simbierowicz, & Z. Wiankowska-Ładyka, Trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.	en_GB
dc.references	Dubbink, W., & von Liedekerke, L. (2009). A Neo-Kantian foundation of corporate social responsibility. Ethic Theory and Moral Practice, 12(2), 117–136.	en_GB
dc.references	Fredriksen, C., & Nielsen, M. (2013). The ethical foundations of CSR. In J. Okpara, & S. O. Idowu (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility challenges, opportunities and strategies for 21st century leaders (pp. 17–34). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2	en_GB
dc.references	Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine.	en_GB
dc.references	Hill, T. E. (1971). Kant on imperfect duty and supererogation. Kant-Studien, 62, 55–76.	en_GB
dc.references	Hill, T. E. (1992). Dignity and practical reason in Kant’s moral theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.	en_GB
dc.references	Hill, T. E. (2002). Human welfare and human worth: Kantian perspective. New York: Clarendon Press.	en_GB
dc.references	Kant, I. (1991). Metaphysics of morals. Cambridge–New York–Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.	en_GB
dc.references	Kant, I. (2001). Uzasadnienie metafizyki moralności [Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals] (M. Wartenberg, Trans.). Kęty: Antyk.	en_GB
dc.references	L’Etang, J. (1992). A Kantian approach to codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 737–744.	en_GB
dc.references	Mansell, S. (2013). Shareholder theory and Kant’s “Duty of Beneficence”. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 583–599.	en_GB
dc.references	Masaka, D. (2008). Why enforcing corporate social responsibility (CSR) is morally questionable. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 13(1), 13–21.	en_GB
dc.references	Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592–636.	en_GB
dc.references	McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.	en_GB
dc.references	Mendes, E. (2007). The moral argument against the business case for corporate social responsibility: A call for a new moral and spiritual approach. University of Ottawa. http://www.ucalgary.ca/christchair/files/christchair/Mendes-detailed-pa per.pdf	en_GB
dc.references	Ohreen, D., & Petry, R. (2012). Imperfect duties and corporate philanthropy: A Kantian approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(3), 367–381.	en_GB
dc.references	Oplustil, K. (2010). Instrumenty nadzoru korporacyjnego (corporate governance) w spółce akcyjnej. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.	en_GB
dc.references	Tapek, K. (2016). Corporate Social Resposonsibility w kontekście imperatywu kategorycznego Kanta. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 19(1), 7–19.	en_GB
dc.references	Wicks, A. C. (1990). Norman Bowie and Richard Rorty on multinationals: Does business ethics need “Metaphysical Comfort”? Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 191–200.	en_GB
dc.references	http://biznes.newsweek.pl/luksemburg-leaks-ktore-firmy-uciekly-z-podatkami-do-luksemburga-,artykuly,351344,1.html	en_GB
dc.references	http://mhcinternational.com/monthly-features/articles/95-csr-in-turbulent-times	en_GB
dc.references	http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/publikacje/badanie-menedzerowie-500lider-csr/	en_GB
dc.references	http://www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/esg-reporting/env-report-2008.pdf	en_GB
dc.references	http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/27/shitty-deal-goldman-exec_n_553541.html	en_GB
dc.references	http://www.pfizer.com.pl/o-firmie/wartosci-firmy-i-spoleczna-odpowiedzialnosc	en_GB
dc.references	https://www.db.com/poland/pl/content/filozofia_biznesu.html	en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmail	krzysztof.tapek@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/1899-2226.21.7.06
dc.relation.volume	21	en_GB
dc.subject.jel	M14

Pliki tej pozycji

Nazwa:: 7_6_85-96_Tapek K..pdf
Rozmiar:: 241.8KB
Format:: PDF

Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym 2018, vol. 21 nr 7 [12]
Annales. Etics in Economic Life 2018, vol. 21 No.7

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.