Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorCourage, Fiona
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T11:42:22Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T11:42:22Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/28629
dc.description.abstractMass Observation was founded in 1937 to collect subjective, qualitative data on everyday life in Britain, and has continued to record the ordinary and the everyday ever since. Mass Observation’s purpose has always been to make the data it collects available to a range of disciplines to apply their own methodological approaches upon, resulting in data that can be reused within different projects and disciplines. This paper will use Mass Observation as a case study to illustrate how a sociological shift in attitude towards subjective data has played out in the use of a dataset traditionally viewed as a historical archive.  I will review how the data itself is used to define and design methods of analysis, examining the epistemological implications of this approach to research design and the new dimension to the researcher-data subject relationship that is introduced. I will conclude by suggesting that research using Mass Observation exemplifies the methodological opportunities and insights that can be gained by adopting a broader, multi-disciplinary research approach to reusing data.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPublikacja współfinansowana w ramach programu Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego pod nazwą „Narodowy Program Rozwoju Humanistyki” – projekt nr 11H 12 0305 81 (umowa nr 0027/NPRH2/H11/81/2012) pt. „Archiwum Danych Jakościowych przy IFiS PAN”, realizowany w latach 2012–2018 w Instytucie Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniwersytet Łódzkien_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPrzegląd Socjologii Jakościowej; 1
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectsubjectiveen_GB
dc.subjectqualitativeen_GB
dc.subjectreuseen_GB
dc.subjectmethodologyen_GB
dc.subjectdataen_GB
dc.titleUsing the Mass Observation Project: A Case Study in the Practice of Reusing Dataen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number32-40
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Sussex, The Library, Brighton, BN1 9QL, UK
dc.identifier.eissn1733-8069
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteFiona Courage is Curator of the Mass Observation Archive and Associate Director at the University of Sussex Library. She has written and presented on Mass Observation extensively over the last 15 years and was awarded a Doctorate in Education from the University of Sussex in 2018 using Mass Observation as the data set for her research.en_GB
dc.referencesCourage, Fiona. 2018. The value of higher education: a temporal analysis from Mass Observation. Brighton: University of Sussex.en_GB
dc.referencesHinton, James. 2013. The Mass Observers: a history, 1937-1949. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesHollway, Wend and Tony Jefferson. 2000. Doing qualitative research differently. London: Sage.en_GB
dc.referencesKramer, Anne-Marie. 2014. “The Observers and the Observed: The ‘dual Vision’ of the Mass Observation Project.” Sociological Research Online 19:1-11.en_GB
dc.referencesLindsey, Rose and Sarah Bulloch. 2014. “A Sociologist’s Field Notes to the Mass Observation Archive: A Consideration of the Challenges of ‘re-Using’ Mass Observation Data in a Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study.” Sociological Research Online 19:1-14.en_GB
dc.referencesMadge, Charles and Tom Harrisson. 1937. Mass Observation. London: Frederick Muller Ltd.en_GB
dc.referencesMadge, Charles and Tom Harrisson. 1938. First Year’s Work. London: Lindsay Drummond.en_GB
dc.referencesMoor, Liz and Emma Uprichard. 2014. “The Materiality of Method: The Case of the Mass Observation Archive.” Sociological Research Online 19:1-11.en_GB
dc.referencesMoore, Niamh. 2006. “The Contexts of Context: Broadening Perspectives in the (Re)Use of Qualitative Data.” Methodological Innovations 1:21-32.en_GB
dc.referencesPollen, Annabella. 2013. “Research methodology in Mass Observation past and present: ‘Scientifically, about as valuable as a chimpanzee’s tea party at the zoo’?” History Workshop Journal 75:213-235.en_GB
dc.referencesPurbrick, Louise. 2007. The wedding present: domestic life beyond consumption. Hampshire: Ashgate.en_GB
dc.referencesPurbrick, Louise. 2008. “Present life: Mass Observation and understanding the ordinary.” Qualitative Researcher 7: 9-11.en_GB
dc.referencesSavage, Mike. 2007. “Changing social class identities in PostWar Britain: perspectives from Mass Observation.” Sociological Research Online 12(3):1-13.en_GB
dc.referencesSavage, Mike. 2010. Identities and social change in Britain since 1940: the politics of method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesShaw, Jenny. 1998. Intellectual property: representative experience and Mass Observation. Brighton: University of Sussex.en_GB
dc.referencesSheridan, Dorothy. 1993. “Writing to the Archive: Mass-Observation as Autobiography.” Sociology 27:27-40.en_GB
dc.referencesSheridan, Dorothy. 1996. Damned anecdotes and dangerous confabulations: Mass-Observation as Life History. Brighton: University of Sussex.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailf.p.courage@sussex.ac.uk
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-8069.15.1.03
dc.relation.volume15en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.