Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Predictive analytics in crime prevention and the European Convention on Human Rights: tackling risks in privacy and fair trial frameworks

dc.contributor.authorMurauskas, Donatas
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T12:21:26Z
dc.date.available2022-02-21T12:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-30
dc.identifier.issn0208-6069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/40689
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I discuss whether the European Convention on Human Rights provides safeguards to individuals affected by predictive analytics in crime prevention. I start with depicting a conceptual issue that worries legal scholars – the trend of law-enforcement authorities to increase their attention to crime prevention rather than traditional criminal investigations. Then, I dive into the right to privacy case-law of the European Court of Human Rights looking for the Court’s references to the threats of data processing. Lastly, I select concrete cases of the European Court of Human Rights on the right to a fair trial to show that the human rights safeguards are not yet developed to frame predictive analytics in crime prevention.en
dc.description.abstract  W tym artykule omawiam, czy Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka zapewnia ochronę osobom, których dotyczą analizy predykcyjne w zapobieganiu przestępczości. Zacznę od przedstawienia zagadnienia koncepcyjnego, które niepokoi prawników – tendencji organów ścigania do zwracania większej uwagi na zapobieganie przestępczości, a nie na tradycyjne dochodzenia. Następnie zagłębię się w prawo do orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w zakresie prywatności, szukając odniesień Trybunału do zagrożeń związanych z przetwarzaniem danych. Na koniec wybrałem konkretne sprawy Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka dotyczące prawa do rzetelnego procesu sądowego, aby wykazać, że zabezpieczenia praw człowieka nie zostały jeszcze opracowane; aby opracować ramy analiz predykcyjnych w zapobieganiu przestępczości. Stwierdzam, że orzecznictwo Europejskiego Trybunału nie gwarantuje wystarczającej ochrony praw człowieka, zwłaszcza gdy organy ścigania stosują analizy predykcyjne w zapobieganiu przestępczości.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridicaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectright to a fair trialen
dc.subjecthuman rightsen
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Human Rightsen
dc.subjectpredictive analyticsen
dc.subjectcase-lawen
dc.subjectprawo do rzetelnego procesupl
dc.subjectprawa człowiekapl
dc.subjectEuropejski Trybunał Praw Człowiekapl
dc.subjectanalizy predykcyjnepl
dc.subjectorzecznictwopl
dc.titlePredictive analytics in crime prevention and the European Convention on Human Rights: tackling risks in privacy and fair trial frameworksen
dc.title.alternativeAnaliza predykcyjna w zapobieganiu przestępczości i Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowiekapl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number225-250
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationVilnius University Law Facultyen
dc.identifier.eissn2450-2782
dc.referencesArbesman, Samuel. 2017. Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension. New York: Portfolio.en
dc.referencesBrkan, Maja. 2019. “Do Algorithms Rule the World? Algorithmic Decision-Making in the Framework of the GDPR and Beyond.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 1: 13–20en
dc.referencesBroeders, Dennis. Erik Schrijvers. Bart van der Sloot. Rosamunde van Brake. Josta de Hoog. Ernst Hirsch Balin. 2017. “Big Data and security policies: Towards a framework for regulating the phases of analytics and use of Big Data.” Computer Law & Security Review 33(3): 309–323.en
dc.referencesCouncil of Europe. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Right to a Fair Trial (criminal limb). Updated on 31 December 2019. https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=caselaw/analysis/guides&c=# [Accessed: 16 March 2020].en
dc.referencesFerguson, Andrew Guthrie. 2017. The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York: New York University Press.en
dc.referencesFerguson, Andrew Guthrie. 2018. “Illuminating Black Data Policing.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 15(2): 503–525.en
dc.referencesGaletta, Antonella. 2013. “The changing nature of the presumption of innocence in today’s surveillance societies: rewrite human rights or regulate the use of surveillance technologies?” European Journal of Law and Technology 4(2). https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/221/377 [Accessed: 30 July 2021].en
dc.referencesGorkic, Primoz. 2018. “Judicial Oversight of the (Mass) Collection and Processing of Personal Data.” In Big Data, Crime and Social Control. Edited by Aleš Završnik. 179–194. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesIsaac, William S. 2018. “Hope, Hype, and Fear: the Promise and Potential Pitfalls of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 15(2): 543–558.en
dc.referencesKahneman, Daniel. 2013. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.en
dc.referencesKaye, David H. Kenneth S. Broun. George E. Dix. Edward J. Imwinkelried. Robert P. Mosteller. Ernest F. Roberts. Eleanor Swift. 2013. McCormick on Evidence. 7th Edition. St. Paul: Thomaon Reuters.en
dc.referencesKerr, Ian R. Jessica Earle. 2013. “Prediction, Preemption, Presumption: How Big Data Threatens Big Picture Privacy.” Stanford Law Review Online 66(65): 65–72. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-and-big-data-prediction-preemption-presumption/ [Accessed: 29 July 2021].en
dc.referencesKnowles, R. 2014. “National Security Rulemaking.” Florida State University Law Review (41)4: 883–944. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2511583en
dc.referencesLacambra, Stephanie J. Jeanna Matthews. Kit Walsh. 2018. “Opening the Black Box: Defendants’ Rights to Confront Forensic Software.” The Champion, May: 28–39, 66.en
dc.referencesMarks, Amber. Ben Bowling. Colman Keenan. 2017. “Automatic Justice? Technology, Crime, and Social Control.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology. Edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, Karen Yeung. London: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesMarquenie, Thomas. 2017. “The Police and Criminal Justice Authorities Directive: Data Protection Standards and Impact on the Legal Framework.” Computer Law & Security Review 33: 324– 340.en
dc.referencesMilanovic, Marko. 2021. “The Grand Normalization of Mass Surveillance: ECtHR Grand Chamber Judgments in Big Brother Watch and Centrum för rättvisa.” EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, May 26, 2021. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-grand-normalization-of-mass-surveillance-ecthr-grand-chamber-judgments-in-big-brother-watch-and-centrum-for-rattvisa/ [Accessed: 26 July 2021].en
dc.referencesPerry, Walter L. Brian McInnis. Carter C. Price. Susan C. Smith. S. John S. Hollywood. 2013. Predictive Policing: the Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. Rand Corporation.en
dc.referencesSartor, Giovanni. 2017. “Human Rights and Information Technologies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology. Edited by Roger Broownsword, Eloise Scotford, Karen Yeung. London: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesSchabas, William A. 2015. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. London: Oxford University Press.en
dc.referencesSpano, Robert. 2018. “The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process- Based Review and the Rule of Law.” Human Rights Law Review 18: 473–494.en
dc.referencesStubbs, Katja Šugman. Mojca M. Plesničar 2018. “Subjectivity, algorithms and the courtroom.” In Big Data, Crime and Social Control. Edited by Aleš Završnik. Oxon–New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesZalnieriute, Monika. 2021. “A Dangerous Convergence: The Inevitability of Mass Surveillance in European Jurisprudence.” EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, June 4, 2021. https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-dangerous-convergence-the-inevitability-of-mass-surveillance-in-european-jurisprudence/ [Accessed: 26 July 2021].en
dc.referencesZavršnik, Aleš. 2018. “Algorithmic crime control.” In Big Data, Crime and Social Control. Edited by Aleš Završnik. Oxon–New York: Routlege.en
dc.referencesZavršnik, Aleš. 2018. “Big data. Big Data: What Is It and Why Does it Matter for Crime and Social Control?” Big Data, Crime and Social Control. Edited by Aleš Završnik. Oxon–New York: Routlege.en
dc.referencesZavršnik, Aleš. 2019. “Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings.” European Journal of Criminology. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477370819876762 [Accessed: 26 July 2021].en
dc.referencesZiemele, Ineta. 2020. “The European Convention on Human Rights: Living Instrument at 70. Science and Technology.” Speech during the opening of the judicial year of the European Court ofen
dc.referencesHuman Rights on January 31, 2020. https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=events/judicial_year&c= [Accessed: 26 July 2021].en
dc.referencesECtHR decision Weber and Seravia v. Germany, 54934/00, 29 June 2006.en
dc.referencesECtHR decision van der Velden v. the Netherlands, 29514/05, 7 December 2006.en
dc.referencesECtHR decision Peruzzo and Martens v. Germany, 7841/08, 4 June 2013.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 19187/91, 17 December 1996.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment Amann v. Switzerland, 27798/95, 16 February 2000.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom, 30562/04, 4 December 2008.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment Bykov v. Russia, 4378/02, 10 March 2009.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment Roman Zakharov v. Russia, 47143/06, 4 December 2015.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment de Tommaso v. Italy, 43395/09, 23 February 2017.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, 25 May 2021.en
dc.referencesECtHR Grand Chamber judgment Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden, 35252/08, 25 May 2021.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Huvig v. France, 11105/84, 24 April 1990.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Kruslin v. France,11801/85, 24 April 1990.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Raimondo v. Italy, 12954/87, 22 February 1994.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Kopp v. Switzerland, 23224/94, 25 March 1998.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment B. and P. v. the United Kingdom, 36337/97, 24 April 2001.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Fretté v. France, 36515/97, 26 February 2002.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Belashev v. Russia, 28617/03, 4 December 2008.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Pocius v. Lithuania, 35601/04, 6 July 2010.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment M.K. v. France, 19522/09, 18 April 2013.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Korošec v. Slovenia, 77212/12, 8 October 2015.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, 37138/14, 12 January 2016.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Aycaguer v. France, 8806/12, 22 June 2017.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Benedik v. Slovenia, 62357/14, 24 April 2018.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Devinar v. Slovenia, 28621/15, 22 May 2018.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Catt v. the United Kingdom, 43514/15, 24 January 2019.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Breyer v. Germany, 50001/12, 30 January 2020.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Gaughran v. the United Kingdom, 45245/15, 13 February 2020.en
dc.referencesECtHR judgment Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, 62439/12, 17 September 2020.en
dc.referencesECtHR Plenary judgment, 5029/71, Klass and others v. Germany, 6 September 1978.en
dc.referencesECtHR Plenary judgment Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands, 8562/79, 29 May 1986.en
dc.referencesECtHR Plenary judgment Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 10590/83, 6 December 1988.en
dc.contributor.authorEmaildonatas.murauskas@tf.vu.lt
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6069.97.13
dc.relation.volume97


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
agralak,_225-250_Murauskas.pdf
Rozmiar:
1.118MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0