Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorIzdebski, Paweł
dc.contributor.authorŻbikowska, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorKotyśko, Martyna
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-14T07:40:02Z
dc.date.available2014-05-14T07:40:02Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1427-969X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/4494
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this review is to present the most important theories of social approval. There are one-factor and two-factor theories of social approval distinguished. The most important among one-factor theories are: Edwards and Crowne–Marlowe models of social approval, and among two-factor theories are: Wiggins, Damarin and Messick, Sackeim and Gur, and Paulhus. There are also presented questionnaires based on theories mentioned above, which are used to measure the need of social approval: the Edwards Social Desirability Scale, the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale, the Self-Deception Questionnaire and the Other-Deception Questionnaire created by Sackeim and Gur, and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR) designed by Paulhus, which consists of two subscales: Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management.en
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Psychologica; 17
dc.subjectsocial approvalen
dc.subjectsocial desirabilityen
dc.subjectneed of social approvalen
dc.subjecttheories of social approvalen
dc.subjectquestionnaires to measure social approvalen
dc.titlePrzegląd teorii aprobaty społecznejpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeReview of the theories of social approvalen
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number5-20pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationInstytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczypl_PL
dc.referencesAdelt, J., Kranas, G. (1978). Zmienna aprobaty społecznej Edwardsa. [W:] L. Wołoszynowa (red.), Materiały do nauczania psychologii. Metody badań psychologicznych: ser. III, t. 3 (s. 225– 240). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.pl
dc.referencesCrowne, D.P., Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24 (4), 349–354.pl
dc.referencesEdwards, L.A. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 37 (2), 90–93.
dc.referencesEdwards, L.A. (1957). Social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.
dc.referencesEdwards, L.A., Walsh, J.A. (1963). The relationship between the intensity of the social desirability keying of a scale and the correlation of the scale with Edward’s SD Scale and the first factor loading of the scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19 (2), 200–203.
dc.referencesIzdebski, P. (2007). Psychologiczne aspekty przebiegu choroby nowotworowej piersi. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy.
dc.referencesKorzeniowski, K. (1980). Osobowościowe przesłanki spostrzegania osób jako wartości autonomicznej. Nieopublikowana praca doktorska. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
dc.referencesMarlowe, D., Crowne, D.P. (1961). Social desirability and response to perceived situational de- mands. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25 (2), 109–115.
dc.referencesMeston, C.M., Heiman, J.R., Trapnell, P.D., Paulhus, D.L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. The Journal of Sex Research, 35 (2), 148–157
dc.referencesPaulhus, D.L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (3), 598–609.
dc.referencesPaulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. [W:] J.P. Robinson, P. Shaver, L.S. Wrightsman (red.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (s. 17–59). San Diego: Academic Press.
dc.referencesPaulhus, D.L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: the evolution of a construct. [W:] H.I. Braun, D.N. Jackson, D.E. Wiley (red.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational mea- surement (s. 49–69). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
dc.referencesPaulhus, D.L., John, O.P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: the interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66 (6), 1025–1060.
dc.referencesPaulhus, D.L., Reid, D.B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (2), 307–317.
dc.referencesStrzałkowska, A. (1993). Potrzeba aprobaty społecznej (teoria Crowne’a i Marlowe’a). [W:] T. Szu- strowa (red.), Osobowość jako przedmiot diagnozy psychologicznej (s. 149–157). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
dc.referencesSullivan, B.F., Scandell, D.J. (2003). Psychological needs and response bias: an examination of Paulhus and John’s reformulation. North American Journal of Psychology, 5 (2), 279–288.
dc.referencesWiggins, J.S. (1964). Convergences among stylistic response measures from objective personality tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24, 554–562.
dc.referencesZalewska, A.M. (2006). Związki pomiędzy potrzebą aprobaty społecznej a zadowoleniem z pracy w badaniach anonimowych. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 9 (2), 29–44.


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord