Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVienne, Jean-Michel
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-29T22:25:51Z
dc.date.available2014-05-29T22:25:51Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.issn0208-6107
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/4705
dc.description.abstractMalebranche's psychology of error and psychology of moral choice are the core of what Locke kept on admiring, even when criticizing the metaphysics and the theory of ideas underlying them. So to understand why Locke rejects Malebranche's "idea" and Malebranche rejects Locke's "idea", it is useful to see where they agree and disagree in the theory of moral choice: pleasure, supreme good, suspense, uneasiness, desire are themas debated around them (Arnauld, Bayle) and between them.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica;11/1995
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.titleMalebranche i Locke. Teoria wyboru moralnego, temat zaniedbanypl_PL
dc.title.alternativeMalebranche and Locke. The Theory of Moral Choice, a Neglected Themepl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number97-110pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet w Nantespl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska