dc.contributor.author | Vienne, Jean-Michel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-29T22:25:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-29T22:25:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0208-6107 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4705 | |
dc.description.abstract | Malebranche's psychology of error and psychology of moral choice are the core of what Locke kept on admiring, even when criticizing the metaphysics and the theory of ideas underlying them. So to understand why Locke rejects Malebranche's "idea" and Malebranche rejects Locke's "idea", it is useful to see where they agree and disagree in the theory of moral choice: pleasure, supreme good, suspense, uneasiness, desire are themas debated around them (Arnauld, Bayle) and between them. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica;11/1995 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.title | Malebranche i Locke. Teoria wyboru moralnego, temat zaniedbany | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Malebranche and Locke. The Theory of Moral Choice, a Neglected Theme | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 97-110 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet w Nantes | pl_PL |