Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorHajn, Zbigniew
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-10T12:46:13Z
dc.date.available2024-07-10T12:46:13Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-30
dc.identifier.issn0208-6069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/52786
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses the legal situation of self-employed workers in international labour law. In particular, it focuses on the International Labour Organisation’s (hereafter: the ILO) predominant and clearly articulated approach in its Employment Relationship Recommendation, 2006 (No. 198), of dichotomising workers into employees and genuinely self-employed, and making the scope of their protection dependent on their belonging to one of these categories. The author questions whether this is the most appropriate way to provide protection to workers working under various forms of contractual arrangements other than the employment contract, including persons to be defined as “genuinely self-employed dependent workers.” A separate strand of consideration is the legal situation of genuinely and independently self-employed workers.en
dc.description.abstractArtykuł dotyczy sytuacji prawnej pracowników samozatrudnionych w międzynarodowym prawie pracy. W szczególności koncentruje się na dominującej w MOP i jasno wyrażonej w Zaleceniu nr 198 z 2006 r. dotyczącym stosunku pracy koncepcji dychotomicznego podziału pracowników na pracowników najemnych i rzeczywiście samozatrudnionych oraz uzależnienia zakresu ich ochrony od przynależności do jednej z tych kategorii. Autor stawia pytanie, czy jest to najwłaściwsza droga do zapewnienia ochrony pracownikom świadczącym pracę w innych niż umowa o pracę formach ustaleń umownych, w tym osobom, które określa jako „rzeczywiście samozatrudnieni pracownicy zależni”. Osobny wątek rozważań stanowi sytuacja prawna pracowników rzeczywiście i autonomicznie samozatrudnionych.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridicaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectself-employed workeren
dc.subjectgenuinely self-employed dependent workeren
dc.subjectgenuinely and independently self-employed workeren
dc.subjectemployment relationshipen
dc.subjectsamozatrudniony pracownikpl
dc.subjectzależny rzeczywiście samozatrudniony pracownikpl
dc.subjectrzeczywiście i autonomicznie samozatrudniony pracownikpl
dc.subjectstosunek pracypl
dc.titleThe International Labour Organisation’s Recommendation No. 198 and Self-Employed Workersen
dc.title.alternativeZalecenie MOP nr 198 a pracownicy samozatrudnienipl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number41-53
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodzen
dc.identifier.eissn2450-2782
dc.referencesBignami, Renato. Giuseppe Casale. Mario Fasani. 2013. Labour inspection and the employment relationship. Working Document Number 28. Geneva: Internation Labour Organization.en
dc.referencesCollins, Hugh. 1990. “Independent Contractors and the Challenge of Vertical Disintegration to Employment Protection Laws.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10: 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/10.3.353en
dc.referencesCommission. 2021/1. Second-Phase Consultation of Social Partners Under Article 154 TFEU on Possible Action Addressing the Challenges Related to Working Conditions in Platform Work (Consultation Document) C(2021) 4230 final.en
dc.referencesCommission. 2021/2. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work, COM(2021) 762 final.en
dc.referencesCommission. 2021/3. Guidelines on the application of EU competition law to collective agreements regarding the working conditions of solo self-employed persons, C(2021) 8838 final.en
dc.referencesConclusions of the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment, 323rd Session, 12–27 March 2015, Geneva. 50–53. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_354090.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2022).en
dc.referencesCountouris, Nicola. Valerio De Stefano. 2019. New trade union strategies for new forms of employment. Brussels: ETUC. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519872323en
dc.referencesCreighton, Breen. Shae McCrystal. 2016. “Who is a ‘Worker’ in International Law?” Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 37(3): 691–725.en
dc.referencesDe Stefano, Valerio. 2021. “Not as simple as it seems: The ILO and the personal scope of International Labour Standards.” International Labour Review 160(3): 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12201en
dc.referencesDuraj, Tomasz. 2023. „Prawny model ochrony pracy na własny rachunek – wprowadzenie do dyskusji.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica 101: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.101.01en
dc.referencesEuropean Commission. 2021. Second-Phase Consultation of Social Partners Under Article 154 TFEU on Possible Action Addressing the Challenges Related to Working Conditions in Platform Work (Consultation Document), Commission C(2021) 4230 final.en
dc.referencesEuropean Parliament. 2007. Resolution of 11th July 2007 on modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st century (2007/2023(INI).en
dc.referencesGoverning, Body. 2000. Report of the Meeting of Experts on Workers in Situations Needing Protection. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesGoverning, Body. 2015. Conclusions of the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILC. 1949. (91st Session), General Survey of the Reports Concerning the Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95) and the Protection of Wages Recommendation (No. 85), Report III (Part 1B). Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILC. 1990. (77th Session), Record of Proceedings, Conclusions concerning the promotion of self-employment. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILC. 1997. (85th Session), Record of Proceedings, Committee reports. Geneva: International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/P/09616/09616%281990-77%29.pdf (accessed: 18.10.2023).en
dc.referencesILC. 1999. (87th Session), Report of the Director-General, Decent Work. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILC. 2003. (91st Session), The scope of the employment relationship. Report V. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILC. 2006. (95th Session), The employment relationship. Report V(1). Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILC. 2020. (109th Session), Promoting employment and decent work in a changing landscape. Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (articles 19, 22 and 35 of the Constitution). Report III (Part B). Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILO. 2016. Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILO. 2018. Freedom of Association. Compilation of decisions of the Committee on Freedom of Association. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILO. 2019. Global Commission on the Future of Work, Work for a Brighter Future. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesILO. 2021. World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesKösters, Lian. Wendy Smits. 2022. “‘Genuine’ or ‘Quasi’ Self-Employment: Who Can Tell?” Social Indicators Research 161: 191–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02794-5en
dc.referencesMusiała, Anna. 2014. “Prawna problematyka świadczenia pracy przez samozatrudnionego ekonomicznie zależnego.” Monitor Prawa Pracy 2: 69–73.en
dc.referencesO’Brien, Charlotte. Eleonor Spaventa. Joyce De Coninck. 2016 Comparative Report 2015. The concept of worker under Article 45 TFEU and certain non-standard forms of employment. Brussels: European Commission. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99808/1/ComparativeReport2015_ConceptOfWorker_20160426FINAL_2_.pdf (accessed: 14.11.2023).en
dc.referencesOffice of the Legal Adviser. 2006. Manual for drafting ILO instruments. Geneva: International Labour Office.en
dc.referencesPerulli, Adalberto. 2003. Economically dependent/quasi-subordinate (parasubordinate) employment: legal, social and economic aspects. Brussels.en
dc.referencesReport of the Meeting of Experts on Workers in Situations Needing Protection. 2000. Geneva 15–19 May 2000.en
dc.referencesServais, Jean-Michel. 2017. International Labour Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.en
dc.referencesSkupień, Dagmara. 2022. “Praca na własny rachunek w ramach Unii Europejskiej w świetle prawa i orzecznictwa.” Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej 29(3): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654SPP.22.023.16568en
dc.referencesWilliams, Colin. Frédéric Lapeyre. 2016. Dependent self-employment: Trends, challenges and policy responses in the EU Dependent self-employment. Geneva: International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082819en
dc.contributor.authorEmailzhajn@wpia.uni.lodz.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6069.107.03
dc.relation.volume107


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0