dc.contributor.author | Dzionek-Kozłowska, Joanna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-07-04T11:12:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-04T11:12:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-05-15 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1899-2226 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/2242 | |
dc.description.abstract | One of the fundamental methodological problems of economics as a separate science
is the question whether economic theorists are able to restrict themselves to the description of facts
without assessing them. Is it possible to create an economic theory utterly deprived of value
judgements? In other words – is economics a positive science? This problem is still debatable,
notwithstanding efforts to eradicate all value judgements from economic analysis and to treat
it as a touchstone of the scientificity of economic reasoning.
The main purpose of the article is to analyse Sedláček arguments and to confront his stance
with other approaches. Furthermore, an attempt is made to assess whether his position could be
attractive for contemporary mainstream economists. | en |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym | |
dc.subject | economics | en |
dc.subject | value judgements | en |
dc.subject | positive science | en |
dc.subject | Tomáš Sedláček | pl_PL |
dc.title | Ekonomia jako nauka pozytywna. Refleksje na marginesie „Ekonomii dobra i zła” Tomáša Sedláčka | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Economics as a Positive Science. Reflections after Reading Tomáš Sedláček’s ‛Economics of Good and Evil’ | en |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2013 | |
dc.page.number | 335-344 | |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2353-4869 | |
dc.references | Backhouse R.E., The Puzzle of Economics. Science or Ideology?, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge 2010. | |
dc.references | Black M., The Gap Between ‘Is’ and ‘Should’, „The Philosophical Review” 1964, vol. 73, nr
2, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2183334. | |
dc.references | Blaug M., Metodologia ekonomii, PWN, Warszawa 1995. | |
dc.references | Coetzee J.M., Elizabeth Costello, Penguin Books, New York, London 2003. | |
dc.references | Colander D.C., The Death of Neoclassical Economics, „Journal of the History of Economic
Thought” 2000, vol. 22, nr 2. | |
dc.references | Davis J.B., Robbins, Textbooks, and the Extreme Value Neutrality View, „History of Political
Economy” 2005, vol. 37. | |
dc.references | Dzionek-Kozłowska J., System ekonomiczno-społeczny Alfreda Marshalla, WN PWN, Warszawa
2007. | |
dc.references | Feyerabend P., Przeciw metodzie, tłum. S. Wiertlewski, Wydawnictwo Siedmioróg, Wrocław
1996. | |
dc.references | Friedman M., Methodology of Positive Economics [w:] Essays in Positive Economics, red.
M. Friedman, Chicago University Press, Chicago 1970 (1953). | |
dc.references | Heilbroner R., Economics as a ‘Value-Free’ Science, „Social Research” 1973, vol. 40, nr 1. | |
dc.references | Heilbroner R., The Problem of Value in Construction of Economic Thought, „Social Research”
1983, vol. 50, nr 2. | |
dc.references | Hume D., Traktat o naturze ludzkiej, tłum. Cz. Znamierowski, PWN, Warszawa 1963, t. II. | |
dc.references | Hutchison T.W., Some Themes from ‘Investigations into Methods’ [w:] Carl Menger and the
Austrian School of Economics, red. J.R. Hicks, W. Weber, Clarendon Press, Oxford
1973. | |
dc.references | Keynes J.N., The Scope and Method of Political Economy, Macmillan & Co., London 1891. | |
dc.references | Makowski P., «Gilotyna» Hume’a, „Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria” 2011, vol. 80, nr 4. | |
dc.references | Marshall A., Industry and Trade, Macmillan & Co., London 1932 (1919). | |
dc.references | McCloskey D., Ethics, Friedman, Buchanan, and the Good Old Chicago School: Getting
(Back) to Humanomics, Referat wygłoszony na dorocznym spotkaniu Summer Institute
for the Preservation of the History of Economic Thought na University of Richmond,
24.06.2011r., http://www.deirdremccloskey.com/editorials/richmond.php. | |
dc.references | McCloskey D., The Secret Sins of Economics, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago 2002. | |
dc.references | McCloskey D., Why I Am no Longer a Positivist, „Review of Social Economy” 1989, vol. 47,
nr 3. | |
dc.references | Mises L., Ludzkie działanie. Traktat o ekonomii, tłum. W. Falkowski, Instytut Ludwiga von
Misesa, Warszawa 2007. | |
dc.references | Mises L., Teoria a historia. Interpretacja procesów społeczno-gospodarczych, Instytut Ludwiga
von Misesa, tłum. G. Łuczkiewicz, WN PWN, Warszawa 2011. | |
dc.references | Myrdal G., The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory, Transaction Publishers,
New Brunswick, London 1990 (1930). | |
dc.references | Myrdal G., Value in Social Theory, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1958. | |
dc.references | Nagel E., Struktura nauki. Zagadnienia logiki wyjaśnień naukowych, PWN, Warszawa 1970. | |
dc.references | Pietrzak M., Problem fundamentu poznania a status etyki. Poglądy Davida Hume’a na naturę
sądów moralnych, „Diametros” 2010, nr 24, http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/
pdf/diam24pietrzak.PDF. | |
dc.references | Robbins L., An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan & Co.,
London 1946 (1932). | |
dc.references | Sedlàček T., Ekonomia dobra i zła. W poszukiwaniu istoty ekonomii od Gilgamesza do Wall
Street, tłum. D. Bakalarz, Wydawnictwo Studio EMKA, Warszawa 2012. | |
dc.references | Senior W.N., An Outline of the Science of Political Economy, Augustus M. Kelly, New York,
1852. | |
dc.references | Weber M., The ‘Objectivity’ of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy [w:] Max
Weber. Collected Methodological Writings, red. H.H. Bruun, S. Whimster, Routledge,
Kindle Edition 2012. | |
dc.contributor.authorEmail | jdzionek@uni.lodz.pl | |
dc.relation.volume | 16 | |
dc.subject.jel | B30 | |
dc.subject.jel | B41 | |