Abstract
The paper aims at a critical investigation of the famous initial chapter of the so called "transcendental
deduction of categories" from Hegel's "Science of Logic". At first, some graphic
interpretation of the dialectic of becoming is proposed to show how different aspects of it fit the
general "thesis–antithesis–synthesis" scheme ruling the transcendental deduction. Then the
question is put forward whether the notions involved in Hegel's doctrine of becoming can really
serve any explanation or clarification of it. The not very surprising answer is that instead of explaining anything they badly need explanation themselves. A suspicion arises that Hegel's actual
intention could have been rather to completely confuse a reader at the very beginning of the
exposition of his system, with the hope that after such a shocking treatment he will loose his
criticism altogether. Such tactics can be very effective sometimes, as the famous Blitzkrieg
invented by German General Staff showed once.