Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Research Freedom and Access to Knowledge in Archaeological Research on Human Remains: Legal and Extra-Legal Perspectives

dc.contributor.authorMazur, Paweł
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T09:24:39Z
dc.date.available2025-02-10T09:24:39Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-30
dc.identifier.issn0208-6069
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/54584
dc.description.abstractPresent-day bioarchaeology of human remains has a complex, normative foundations, and this results in a nearly paradigmatic shift in research conducted in that discipline of science. This article first introduces the manifold non-scientific significance of human remains and mortuary sites and the essentials of bioarchaeological research as well. It subsequently examines the concept of research freedom in the context of international and domestic regulations. Each state regulates bioarchaeological research distinctly. The article outlines a diplomatic pathway for undertaking research abroad. We then examine (de)colonial, indigenous, religious, and political contexts in which extra-legal regulations on the study of human remains also gain validity. This leads to a normative pluralism, the sources and justification of which we analyse and examplify. Such a pluralism unveils the deficits of positive legal regulation in the various contexts of discussed research. Our article is to support researchers in dealing with normative challenges – legal and extralegal – when it comes to undertaking research on human remains.en
dc.description.abstractDzisiejsza bioarcheologia szczątków ludzkich ma złożone umocowanie normatywne, które pociąga za sobą zgoła paradygmatyczne zmiany w badaniach prowadzonych w tej dyscyplinie nauki. Niniejszy artykuł w pierwszej kolejności przybliża wielorakie pozanaukowe znaczenie szczątków ludzkich i miejsc pochówki i istotę badań bioarcheologicznych. Następnie analizuje pojęcie wolności badań w kontekście międzynarodowych i rodzimych regulacji. Każde państwo odrębnie reguluje badania bioarcheologiczne. W artykule nakreślamy dyplomatyczną ścieżkę umożliwiającą podjęcie badań za granicą. Następnie badamy konteksty (de)kolonialne, rdzenne, religijne i polityczne, w których ważność zyskały także pozaprawne regulacje dotyczące badania ludzkich szczątków. Prowadzi to do pluralizmu normatywnego, którego źródła i zasadność analizujemy i egzemplifikujemy. Pluralizm taki odsłania deficyty pozytywnych regulacji prawnych w najróżniejszych kontekstach badań nad ludzkimi szczątkami. Nasz artykuł ma wesprzeć naukowców w radzeniu sobie z wyzwaniami normatywnymi – prawnymi i pozaprawnymi – gdy przychodzi im podjąć badania na ludzkich szczątkach.pl
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridicaen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectResearch freedomen
dc.subjectresearch on human remainsen
dc.subjectbioarchaeologyen
dc.subjectlegalen
dc.subjectextra-legalen
dc.subjectand multinormative regulationsen
dc.subject(de)colonialen
dc.subjectindigenousen
dc.subjectreligious and political contextsen
dc.subjectwolność badań naukowychpl
dc.subjectbadania na ludzkich szczątkachpl
dc.subjectbioarcheologiapl
dc.subjectregulacje prawnepl
dc.subjectpozaprawne i multinormatywnepl
dc.subjectkonteksty (de)kolonialnepl
dc.subjectrdzennepl
dc.subjectreligijne i politycznepl
dc.titleResearch Freedom and Access to Knowledge in Archaeological Research on Human Remains: Legal and Extra-Legal Perspectivesen
dc.title.alternativeWolność badań i dostęp do wiedzy w badaniach archeologicznych szczątków ludzkich: perspektywa prawna i pozaprawnapl
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number141-175
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMazur, Paweł - Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznańen
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationNowak, Ewa - Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznańen
dc.identifier.eissn2450-2782
dc.referencesAmnesty International. 2023. Indigenous Peoples. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/indigenous-peoples/en
dc.referencesAppadurai, Arjun. 2017. “Museum Objects as Accidental Refugees.” Historische Anthropologie 25(3): 401–408. https://doi.org/10.7788/ha-2017-0306en
dc.referencesAppadurai, Arjun. 2021. “The Museum, the Colony, and the Planet: Territories of the Imperial Imagination.” Public Culture 33(1): 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-8742232en
dc.referencesAthreya, Sheela, and Rebecca Rogers Ackermann. 2019. “Colonialism and Narratives of Human Origins in Asia and Africa.” In M. Porr, J. Matthews (Eds). Interrogating Human Origins: Decolonisation and the Deep Past. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203731659-4en
dc.referencesAustralian Government. Director of National Parks. 2023. “Fact Sheet.” https://sacredland.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Media-Fact-Sheet-Sorry-Rocks-2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3sDtJ9bnV4vxVi4KU-Nrwd0wZKh9ZMUPJatS_0PfJsAk4Ogm8TA600c5Een
dc.referencesBaloyi, Lesiba, and Molebogeng Makobe-Rabothata. 2014. “The African Conception of Death: A Cultural Implication.” In Toward Sustainable Development through Nurturing Diversity. Proceedings from the 21st International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. Edited by Leon T.B. Jackson et al. 232–243. Stellenbosch: Grand Valley State University. https://doi.org/10.4087/FRDW2511en
dc.referencesBarcik, Jacek, and Łukasz Pilarz. 2016. “Wykorzystanie zwłok i szczątków ludzkich przez studentów do celów dydaktycznych a przestępstwo znieważenia zwłok z art. 262 § 1 k.k.” Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 4(20): 87–105.en
dc.referencesBednarek, Małgorzata. 2020. Sytuacja prawna cmentarzy żydowskich w Polsce. Kraków–Budapesz–Syrakuzy. Kraków: Austeria.en
dc.referencesBhagabati, Dikshit Sarma. 2023. “How to Be Indigenous in India?” Law and Critique 35: 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09343-8en
dc.referencesBlake, Janet. 2015. International Cultural Heritage Law, Cultural Heritage Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723516.001.0001en
dc.referencesBlake, Janet. 2021. “Where Heritage Meets Bioethics: Indigenous Human Remains and Genetic Prospecting.” Iranian Journal of Biomedical Law and Ethics 2(1): 36–46.en
dc.referencesBloxham, Donald. 2003. “The Armenian Genocide of 1915–1916: Cumulative Radicalization and the Development of a Destruction Policy.” Past and Present 181: 141–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/181.1.141en
dc.referencesBonn Declaration on Freedom of Scientific Research. 2020. https://www.bmbf.de/files/10_2_2_Bonn_Declaration_en_final.pdfen
dc.referencesBonner, Laure. 2022. “DNA from human remains found in medieval well shines new light on Jewish history.” University of Cambridge, Department of Archeology, 30 August. https://www.arch.cam.ac.uk/news/dna-human-remains-found-medieval-well-shines-new-light-jewish-history?fbclid=IwAR3AXvqm2CdW-cu02zaOPPJIA_8dpujhHnLiYLRBMoX3x7gqeYY5jBkAgQen
dc.referencesBorselli, Diletta, Tomasso Beni, Lorenzo Bonechi et al. 2023. “Muographic study of the Palazzone necropolis (Perugia, Italy).” Paper presented at International Workshop on Muography, Naples, 19–22 June 2023.en
dc.referencesBrace, Selina, Yoan Diekmann, Thomas Booth et al. 2022. “Genomes from a Medieval Mass Burial Show Ashkenazi-associated Hereditary Diseases Pre-date the 12th Century.” Current Biology 32: 4350–4359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.036en
dc.referencesBrooks, Alasdair, and Ruth Young. 2016. “Historical Archaeology and Heritage in the Middle East: A Preliminary Overview.” Historical Archaeology 50(4): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379198en
dc.referencesBugaj, Michał. 2018. “Magazyny archeologiczne w Polsce – kwestia przechowywania zabytków archeologicznych, czyli rzecz o stajniach Augiasza i kilka przykładów dobrych praktyk.” In Znaleziska archeologiczne: problemy konserwacji, inwentaryzacji i przechowywania. Edited by Katarzyna Zdeb. 103–114. Warszawa–Zielona Góra–Głogów–Legionowo: Muzeum Historyczne w Legionowie.en
dc.referencesBullion, Elissa, Farhod Maksudov, Edward Henry et al. 2022. “Community Practice and Religion at an Early Islamic Cemetery in Highland Central Asia.” Antiquity 96(387): 628–645. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2021.106en
dc.referencesCarney, Scott. 2007. “Inside India’s Underground Trade in Human Remains.” Wired, November 2007. https://www.wired.com/2007/11/ff-bones/en
dc.referencesCode of Ethics. World Archaeological Congress. 1990. https://archaeologicalethics.org/code-of-ethics/world-archaeological-congress-code-of-ethics/en
dc.referencesColomer, Laia. 2014. “The Politics of Human Remains in Managing Archaeological Medieval Jewish Burial Grounds in Europe.” Nordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidskrift 17(2): 168–186. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN2000-8325-2014-02-02en
dc.referencesColwell, Chip. 2014. “The Sacred and the Museum: Repatriation and the Trajectories of Inalienable Possessions.” Museum Worlds: Advances in Research 2: 10–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2014.020102en
dc.referencesCornu, Marie, and Marc-André Renold. 2010. “New Developments in the Restitution of Cultural Property: Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution.” International Journal of Cultural Property 17(1): 1–31.en
dc.referencesCouncil of Europe. 1995. Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.en
dc.referencesCox, Carole, and Ephross Paul. 1998. Ethnicity and Social Work Practice. New York: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195099317.001.0001en
dc.referencesCultural Heritage in EU Policies. 2018. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/621876/EPRS_BRI(2018)621876_EN.pdfen
dc.referencesCurta, Florin. 2014. “Ethnic Identity and Archaeology.” In Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Edited by Claire Smith. 2507–2514. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1715en
dc.referencesCzekanowski, Jan. 1917–1927. Forschungen im Nil-Kongo Zwischengebiet. Vols I/V. Leipzig: Klinkhardt & Biermann.en
dc.referencesCzerska, Tatiana. 2017. “Jan Czekanowski: antropolog na czarnym lądzie.” Białostockie Studia Literaturoznawcze 10: 245–257. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsl.2017.10.15en
dc.referencesDaley, Paul. 2020. “The room of the dead: how a museum became a halfway house for bones and spirits.” The Guardian, 4 July. https://amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jul/05/the-room-of-the-dead-how-a-museum-became-a-halfway-house-for-bones-and-spirits?fbclid=IwAR3iUMLDlWxV0Cu8KkYbA3CcBzrgwGPWkkNCTsFXcuVnU3aHTuTrtqAm5ocen
dc.referencesDavis, Kate, and Alex Borisenko. 2017. Introduction to Access and Benefit-Sharing and the Nagoya Protocol: What DNA Barcoding Researchers Need to Know. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e22579en
dc.referencesDenger, Chaim N. 1955. Code of Hebrew Law – Shulhan ‘Aruk – Hoshen Hamishpat. Treating of the Laws of Judges. Montréal: The Jurisprudence Press.en
dc.referencesDenham, Sean et al. 2022. Guidelines of Ethical Research on Human Remains. Oslo: National Research Ethics Committee. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/globalassets/dokumenter/4-publikasjoner-som-pdf/guidelines-for-ethical-research-on-human-remains-web.pdfen
dc.referencesDiaz-Andreu, Margarita. 2015. “Ethnic Identity and Ethnicity in Archaeology.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Edited by James Wright. Vol. 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.13032-6en
dc.referencesDupret, Baudouin. 2007. “Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-specification.” European Journal of Legal Studies 1(1): 296–318.en
dc.referencesDussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of ‘the Other’ and the Myth of Modernity. New York: Continuum.en
dc.referencesDzierlińska, Monika. 2019. “Anthropological Analysis of Human Remains from Inhumation Graves at the Cemetery of the Oksywie and Wielbark Culture at Drawsko Pomorskie.” Materiały Zachodniopomorskie. Nowa Seria 15: 239–248.en
dc.referencesEckstein, Lars, Dirk Wiemann, Nicole Waller, and Anke Bartels. 2017. Postcolonial Justice. An Introduction. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.en
dc.referencesEconomic and Social Council UN/Committee of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2020. General comment No. 25 (2020) on science and economic, social and cultural rights (article 15 (1) (b), (2), (3) and (4) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights).en
dc.referencesEilstein, Helena. 2005. “Uwagi o aksjologii scjentyzmu.” In Ideały nauki i konflikty wartość. Studia złożone w darze Profesorowi Stefanowi Amsterdamskiemu. Edited by Ewa Chmielecka, Jerzy Jedlicki, Andrzej Rychard. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.en
dc.referencesEliassi, Barzoo. 2016. “Statelessness in a World of Nation-States: The Cases of Kurdish Diasporas in Sweden and the UK.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(9): 1403–1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1162091en
dc.referencesThe European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage. 1992. The European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (Valetta) with amendments. https://rm.coe.int/168007bd25en
dc.referencesEverill, Paul. 2007. “British Commercial Archaeology: Antiquarians and Labourers, Developers and Diggers.” In Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. Edited by Yannis Hamilakis, P.G. Duke. 119–136. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.en
dc.referencesFerris, Neil. 2003. “Between Colonial and Indigenous Archaeologies: Legal and Extra-legal Ownership of the Archaeological Past in North America.” Canadian Journal of Archaeology 27: 154–190.en
dc.referencesFerris, Neil. 2009. The Archaeology of Native-lived Colonialism: Challenging History in the Great Lakes. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kz4gx4en
dc.referencesFerris, Neil, and John R. Welch. 2014. “Beyond Archaeological Agendas: In the Service of a Sustainable Archaeology.” In Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects. Sonya Atalay, Lee Rains Claus, Randall McGuire, John R. Welch. 215–238. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.en
dc.referencesFerris, Neil, and John R. Welch. 2015. “New Worlds: Ethics in Contemporary North American Archaeological Practice.” In Ethics and Archaeological Praxis, Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice 1. Edited by Cristóbal Gnecco, Dorothy Lippert. 69–92. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_7en
dc.referencesFlorek, Marek. 2019. “Kilka uwag o ustawowych definicjach zabytku archeologicznego i badań archeologicznych oraz ich konsekwencjach.” Ochrona Zabytków 2: 11–29.en
dc.referencesFlorek, Marek. 2020. “Ekshumacje czy badania archeologiczne?” Raport 15: 369–375.en
dc.referencesFornaciari, Gino. 2017. “New Methods for Investigating Past Epidemics (Archaeology, Paleopathology, ancient DNA).” In Épidémies et sociétés, passé, présent et futur. Edited by Bernardino Fantini. 37–50. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.en
dc.referencesFramework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. 1995. Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. Council of Europe.en
dc.referencesFuchs, Katharina, Christoph Rinne, Clara Drummer et al. 2019. “Infectious Diseases and Neolithic Transformations: Evaluating Biological and Archaeological Proxies in the German Loess Zone between 5500 and 2500 BCE.” The Holocene 29(10): 1545–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683619857230en
dc.referencesGallagher, Daphne, and Stephen Dueppen. 2018. “Recognizing Plague Epidemics in the Archaeological Record of West Africa.” Afriques 9. https://doi.org/10.4000/afriques.2198en
dc.referencesGaupp, Lisa, Anna Abramjan, Frida Mervecan Akinay et al. 2020. “Curatorial Practices of the ‘Global’: Toward a Decolonial Turn in Museums in Berlin and Hamburg?” Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy 2: 107–138. https://doi.org/10.14361/zkmm-2020-0205en
dc.referencesGinter, Artur, and Anna Michalak. 2016. Ustawa o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.en
dc.referencesGordon, Ewa, and Boaz Pash. 2009. Modlitwy na cmentarzu i zwyczaje pogrzebowe. Kraków–Budapeszt: Austeria.en
dc.referencesGosden, Chris. 2004. Archaeology and Colonialism. Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesGovernment of India. Ministry of Home Affairs. Press Information Bureau. 2019. 5 February. https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1562728en
dc.referencesGunn, Kate, and Bruce McIvor. 2020. First Peoples Law. https://www.firstpeopleslaw.com/public-education/blog/the-wetsuweten-aboriginal-title-and-the-rule-of-law-an-explaineren
dc.referencesHanc, Jakub, and Olga Sitarz. 2017. “Przestępstwo znieważenia zwłok (aspekty dogmatyczne i praktyczne).” Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych 2(21): 53–78.en
dc.referencesHariri, Achmad, Satria Unggul Wicaksana, and Samsul Arifin. 2022. “A Critical Study of Legal Positivism as a Legal System in a Pluralist Country.” 3rd International Conference on Law Reform, INCLAR KnE Social Sciences, 22–23 July 2022 (Virtual). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12131en
dc.referencesHellenic Society for Law and Archaeology. 2023. https://www.law-archaeology.gr/index.php/en/moveable-monuments (accessed: 20.12.2023).en
dc.referencesHenderson, James Youngblood. 2009. “The Appropriation of Human Remains: A First Nations Legal and Ethical Perspective.” In The Ethics of Cultural Appropriation. Edited by James O. Young, Conrad G. Brunk. 55–71. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444311099.ch3en
dc.referencesHick, Dan. 2021. “Necrography: Death-Writing in the Colonial Museum.” British Art Studies 19. https://doi.org/10.17658/issn.2058-5462/issue-19/conversationen
dc.referencesHudetz, Mary. 2023. “A Scientist Said Her Research Could Help with Repatriation. Instead, It Destroyed Native Remains.” Pro Publica, July 20. https://www.propublica.org/article/delayed-repatriation-allows-destructive-research-native-american-remainsen
dc.referencesHuffer, Damien, Duncan Chappell, Nathan Charlton, and Brian F. Spatola. 2019. “Bones of Contention: The Online Trade in Archaeological, Ethnographic, and Anatomical Human Remains on Social Media Platforms.” In The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. Edited by Saskia Hufnagel, Duncan Chappell. 527–556. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.en
dc.referencesIndigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, No. 169. 1989. https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169; https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdfen
dc.referencesInternational Council of Museums. 2019/2020. The ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums. https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/poland.pdfen
dc.referencesIsrael Antiquities Authority. 2023. https://www.antiquities.org.il/article_eng.aspx?sec_id=45&subj_id=220&autotitle=true&Module_id=7en
dc.referencesJaskólska, Wioletta. 2020. Jak przygotować wniosek o pozwolenie na badania archeologiczne. Warszawa: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa. https://samorzad.nid.pl/baza_wiedzy/jak-przygotowac-wniosek-o-pozwolenie-na-badania-archeologiczne/?fbclid=IwAR2WLddrekULSaM3LVhX4VZ4wz7JxIQilyuGstvFwDiVmPYza3HK--woVjQen
dc.referencesJoannes-Boyau, Renaud, Alessandro Pellizzon, John Page et al. 2020. “Owning Humankind: Fossils, Humans and Archaeological Remains.” Heliyon 6(6): e04129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04129en
dc.referencesJones, Siân. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity. London: Routledge.en
dc.referencesJurda, Mikoláš, Petra Urbanová, and Jiří Chmelík. 2019. “Digital Restoration of Fragmentary Human Skeletal Remains: Testing the Feasibility of Virtual Reality.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 66: 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.06.005en
dc.referencesKalisz, Anna. 2013. “Klauzula moralności (publicznej) w prawie polskim i europejskim jako przykład regulacyjnej, ochronnej oraz innowacyjnej funkcji prawa.” Principia 57/58: 197–210.en
dc.referencesKaro, Yosef. 1563. “Shulchan Arukh.” https://www.sefaria.orgen
dc.referencesKarski, Kamil, Sebastian Różycki, and Aleksander Schwarz. 2017. “Memories of Recent Past. Objectives and Results of Non-invasive Archaeological Research Project at KL Plaszów Memorial Site.” Analecta Archeologica Ressoviensia 12: 221–246. https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2017.12.13en
dc.referencesKieffer, Nail. 2018. The Structural Violence of Maya Sacrifice: A Case Study of Ritualized Human Sacrifice at Midnight Terror Cave, Belize. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/160274558.pdfen
dc.referencesKobyliński, Zbigniew. 2018. “Przechowywanie znalezisk archeologicznych: kolekcje prywatne a zbiory publiczne w kręgu cywilizacji europejskiej.” Znaleziska archeologiczne: problemy konserwacji, inwentaryzacji i przechowywania. Archaeologica Hereditas 14: 103–115.en
dc.referencesLabadie, Camille. 2021. “Decolonizing Collections: A Legal Perspective on the Restitution of Cultural Artifacts.” ICOM – International Council of Museums 49(2): 132–146. https://doi.org/10.4000/iss.3784en
dc.referencesLeszczyński, Leszek, Marek Zirk-Sadowski, and Bartosz Wojciechowski. 2012. “Wykładnia w prawie administracyjnym.” In System prawa administracyjnego. Vol. 4. Edited by Roman Hauser, Zygmunt Konrad Niewiadomski, Andrzej Wróbel. Warszawa: C.H.Beck.en
dc.referencesLetsch, Constanze, and Kate Connolly. 2023. “Turkey wages ‘cultural war’ in pursuit of its archaeological treasures.” The Guardian, 21 January.en
dc.referencesLicata, Marta, Alessandro Bonsignore, Rosa Boano et al. 2020. “Study, Conservation and Exhibition of Human Remains: The Need of a Bioethical Perspective.” Acta Biomedica 91(4): e2020110.en
dc.referencesLichwa, Natalia, and Piotr Stec. 2023. “Repatriacja zwłok i szczątków ludzkich jako problem prawa dziedzictwa kulturowego.” Palestra 9: 104–111.en
dc.referencesLino, Dylan. 2017. “The Uluru Statement: Towards Federalism with First Nations.” Australian Public Law, 13 June. https://auspublaw.org/blog/2017/06/towards-federalism-with-first-nations/en
dc.referencesLoudine, Philip. 2021. “The Role of Archaeology in the Study of Plagues and Pandemics.” National Museum Publications, 16 March. https://nationalmuseumpublications.co.za/the-role-of-archaeology-in-the-study-of-plagues-and-pandemics/?fbclid=IwAR0Z1MBhUIpHSxOIKwirhWfV7aJs4sR3iNCBfJ5uvaVEiJuklXdh3X8vQAcen
dc.referencesLozina, Ante, Ivana Kružić, Ana Banovac et al. 2021. “Utilizing Human Remains for Science: Ethical, Legal, and Scientific Issues in Croatia, United Kingdom and the United States.” Beijing Law Review 12: 161–176. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2021.121009en
dc.referencesMalarewicz, Agnieszka. 2008. “The Legal Character of ‘Cemetery Property’ in Polish Civil Law.” In Real Estate in Czech and Polish Law. Edited by Grzegorz Liszewski et al. 120–124. Białystok: Temida 2.en
dc.referencesMałek-Orłowska, Monika, and Katarzyna Jach. 2022. “Aspekty normatywne i aktualna sytuacja Komisji Etyki Badań Naukowych z Udziałem Ludzi na polskich uczelniach technicznych.” Diametros 74: 19–35. https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1811en
dc.referencesMargalit, Avishai. 2004. The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA–London, UK: Harvard University Press.en
dc.referencesMárquez-Grant, Nicholas, and Linda Fibiger, eds. 2011. The Routledge Handbook of Archaeological Human Remains and Legislations: An International Guide to Laws and Practice in the Excavation and Treatment of Archaeological Human Remains. London–New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesMarsh, William A., and Silvia Bello. 2023. “Cannibalism and Burial in the Late Upper Palaeolithic: Combining Archaeological and Genetic Evidence.” Quaternary Science Reviews 319: 108309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108309en
dc.referencesMazurkiewicz, Jacek, and Piotr Szymaniec. 2019. “‘Nie wszystek umrę, wiele ze mnie tu zostanie…’. Aspekty prawne szczątków ludzkich jako dóbr kultury i integralności zwłok w tradycji kulturowej.” Studia Prawnoustrojowe 45: 179–197. https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.5202en
dc.referencesMboro, Mnyaka Sururu, and Christian Kopp. 2018. “‘Unter Kannibalen’ – Afrikanische Initiativen zur Rückführung der Ahnen.” In Unmittelbarer Umgang mit menschlichen Überresten in Museen und Universitätssammlungen. Edited by Sandra Mühlenberend, Jakob Fuchs, Vera Marušić. 35–46. Hochschule für Bildende Künste Dresden.en
dc.referencesMisiuk, Zbigniew, Jakub Wrzosek, Agnieszka Oniszczuk et al., eds. 2019. Wytyczne do prowadzenia badań archeologicznych. Cz. 2. Badania inwazyjne lądowe. Warszawa: Rada Ochrony Dziedzictwa Narodowego.en
dc.referencesMoissidou, Despina, Jasmine Day et al. 2015. “Invasive versus Non Invasive Methods Applied to Mummy Research: Will This Controversy Ever Be Solved?” BioMed Research International 192829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/192829en
dc.referencesMoro-Abadía, Oscar. 2006. “The History of Archaeology as a ‘Colonial Discourse’.” Bulletin of the History of Archeology 16(2): 4–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/bha.16202en
dc.referencesMudimbe, Valentin-Yves. 1994. The Idea of Africa. Oxford: James Currey Ltd.en
dc.referencesMudimbe, Valentin-Yves. 1988. The Invention of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.en
dc.referencesMuseum of British Colonialism. 2020. “The Colonial Origins of Medical Teaching’s Skeletons”, 19 November. https://museumofbritishcolonialism.org/2020-11-17-the-colonial-origins-of-medical-teaching-skeletons-w5bff/en
dc.referencesNagar, Yossi. 2021. “The Human Skeletal Remains.” ‘En Esur (‘Ein Asawir) III, IAA Reports 68: 267–271. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv26fw7vj.15en
dc.referencesNagar, Yossi, and Flavia Sonntag. 2008. “Byzantine Period Burials in the Negev: Anthropological Description and Summary.” Israel Exploration Journal 58(1): 79–94.en
dc.referencesThe Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2014. https://www.cbd.int/ABSen
dc.referencesNapoleon, Valerie Ruth. 2012. “Thinking About Indigenous Legal Orders.” In Dialogues on Human Rights and Legal Pluralism. Edited by Coleen Shepard. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4_11en
dc.referencesNapoleon, Valerie Ruth. 2016. “What is Indigenous Law? A Small Discussion.” https://www.uvic.ca/law/assets/docs/ilru/What%20is%20Indigenous%20Law%20Oct%2028%202016.pdfen
dc.referencesNational Science Centre. 2023. “Wytyczne dla wnioskodawców do uzupełnienia formularza dotyczącego kwestii etycznych w projekcie badawczym.” Resolution no. 1/33/2023. https://www.ncn.gov.pl/sites/default/files/pliki/regulaminy/2021_12_wytyczne_dla_wnioskodawcow_kwestie_etyczne.pdfen
dc.referencesNicholas, George, and Alison Wylie. 2009. “‘Do Not Do unto Others…’: Cultural Misrecognition and the Harms of Appropriation in an Open-Source World.” In Appropriating the Past: Philosophical Perspectives on the Practice of Archaeology. Edited by Geoffrey Scarre, Robert Coningham. 195–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026932.013en
dc.referencesNichols, Katherine, Chelsea Meloche, and Laure Spake. 2021. “Repatriation Has Transformed, Not Ended, Research.” OP-ED Material World, 16 November. https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/repatriation-effects/?fbclid=IwAR2hw6pGjx93i6FM3cGmaa_I6Xd2gTRWhUwbHC7qWV1Bsaz9njHyxSK7v7Een
dc.referencesNillson Stutz, Liv. 2023. “Between Objects of Science and Lived Lives. The Legal Liminality of Old Human Remains in Museums and Research.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 29(10): 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2234350en
dc.referencesOberauer, Norbert, Yvonne Prief, and Ulrike Qubaja, eds. 2019. Legal Pluralism in Muslim Contexts. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004398269en
dc.referencesO’Donnabhain, Barra, and María Cecilia Lozada, eds. 2014. Archaeological Human Remains. Global Perspectives. Cham: Springer.en
dc.referencesOwen, Roger. 2004. State, Power and Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East. London–New York: Routledge.en
dc.referencesPanzer, Stephanie, Sieglinde Ketterl, Roxane Bicker et al. 2019. “How to CT Scan Human Mummies: Theoretical Considerations and Examples of Use.” International Journal of Paleopathology 26: 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpp.2019.06.005en
dc.referencesPearce, Joanna. 2019. “Digging up the Dead. An Archaeological Field School Experience Shines a Light on the Grave Concerns People Have about the Treatment of Human Remains.” Sapiens, 1 November. https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/mortuary-archaeology/?fbclid=IwAR3abYBtIj_ifCzO-uhK2s4YxVYYsTZaUyw694Y4KDzDVBvQjuutj2s5314en
dc.referencesPietrzykowski, Tomasz. 2019. “Moralność publiczna a konstytucyjne podstawy ochrony zwierząt.” Studia Prawnicze 1: 16–17. https://doi.org/10.37232/sp.2019.1.1en
dc.referencesRabbinical Commission for Cemeteries. 2024. “Guidelines.” https://sztetl.org.pl (accessed: 15.09.2024).en
dc.referencesReich, David. 2018. Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. Milano: Cortina Editore.en
dc.referencesReich, Ronny, Yaakov Billig, and Yossi Nagar. 2023. “An Early Islamic Cemetery at the Edge of the Temple Mount.” In The Southern Wall of the Temple Mount and Its Corners: Past, Present and Future. Edited by Y. Baruch, R. Reich, M. Hagbi, J. Uziel. 344–377. University Park, PA: Eisenbrauns; Jerusalem: Ancient Jerusalem Publications & Israel Antiquities Authority Publications. https://doi.org/10.5325/jj.10518972.29en
dc.referencesRiggs, Christina. 2017. “The Body in the Box: Archiving the Egyptian Mummy.” Archaeological Science 17: 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9266-8en
dc.referencesRivlin, Eliezer. 2012. “Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction.” McGill Law Journal 57(4): 781–790. https://doi.org/10.7202/1013031aren
dc.referencesRonald, Issy. 2023. “Don’t say ‘mummy’: Why museums are rebranding ancient Egyptian remains.” CNN, 23 January 2023.en
dc.referencesSafi, Michael. 2022. “American Killed by Isolated Tribe on North Sentinel Island in Andamans.” The Guardian, 22 November.en
dc.referencesScarre, Geoffrey. 2003. “Archaeology and Respect for the Dead.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 20(3): 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0264-3758.2003.00250.xen
dc.referencesSchiff Berman, Paul, ed. 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.001.0001en
dc.referencesSchnapp, Alain. 2002. “Between Antiquarians and Archaeologists: Continuities and Ruptures.” Antiquity 76(291): 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00089900en
dc.referencesScruton, Roger. 2013. Green Philosophy. London: Atlantic.en
dc.referencesSeferian, Nareg. 2017. The Clash of Turkish and Armenian Narratives: The Imperative for a Comprehensive and Nuanced Public Memory. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.en
dc.referencesShahar, Ido. 2008. “Legal Pluralism and the Study of Shari’a Courts.” Islamic Law and Society 15(1): 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851908X287280en
dc.referencesSiegel-Itzkovich, Judy. 2001. “Orthodox Jews Demand University Bury Its Bones.” BMJ 322(7294): 1084. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1084en
dc.referencesSierpowska, Iwona. 2020. Śmierć w ujęciu prawa administracyjnego. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.en
dc.referencesSkille, Eivind. 2022. “Doing Research into Indigenous Issues Being Non-Indigenous.” Qualitative Research 22(6): 831–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211005947en
dc.referencesSmith, Adam. 2023. “Unseeing the Past Archaeology and the Legacy of the Armenian Genocide.” Current Anthropology 63: 56–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/722380en
dc.referencesSobczak, Jacek. 2007. “Wolność badań naukowych – standardy europejskie i rzeczywistość polska.” Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe 2(30): 53–74.en
dc.referencesSobczak, Jacek. 2008. “Wolność badań naukowych – złudzenia a rzeczywistość.” In Dylematy praw człowieka. Edited by Teresa Gardocka, Jacek Sobczak. Toruń: Adam Marszałek.en
dc.referencesSoloveitchik, Joseph B. 2017. Halakhic Morality. Essays on Ethics and Masorach. Jerusalem: Maggid Books.en
dc.referencesSołtysiak, Arkadiusz, and Rafał Koliński. 2011. “Preliminary Report on Human Remains from Tell Arbid, Sector P. Excavation Seasons 2008–2010.” Światowit 9(50)A: 49–66.en
dc.referencesSossis, Richard. 2007. “Why Sacred Lands Are Not Indivisible: The Cognitive Foundations of Sacralising Land.” Journal of Terrorism Research 2(1): 17–44. https://doi.org/10.15664/jtr.172en
dc.referencesSpivak, Gayatri. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf541en
dc.referencesSrigyan, Megha, Héctor Bolívar, Irene Ureña et al. 2022. “Bioarchaeological Evidence of One of the Earliest Islamic Burials in the Levant.” Communications Biology 5: 554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03508-4en
dc.referencesStaniewska, Alexandra, and Ewa Domańska, eds. 2023. Ekshumacje polityczne: teoria i praktyka. Gdańsk: słowo/obraz terytoria.en
dc.referencesSulkiewicz, Dagmara, and Barbara Pawlic-Miśkiewicz. 2021. Mizary. Tatarskie cmentarze w Polsce. Białystok: Anex.en
dc.referencesSullivan, Winifried Fallers. 2005. “Normative Pluralism: Islam, Religion and Law in the Twenty-first Century.” Religion 35(1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2005.02.002en
dc.referencesSwali, Pooja, Rick Schulting, Alexandre Gilardet et al. 2023. “Yersinia Pestis Genomes Reveal Plague in Britain 4000 Years ago.” Nature Communications 14: 2930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38393-wen
dc.referencesTamanaha, Brian. 2021. “Legal Pluralism across the Global South: Colonial Origins and Contemporary Consequences.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53(2): 168–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1942606en
dc.referencesTelushkin, Joseph. 2009. A Code of Jewish Ethics. Vol. 2. Love Your Neighbor as Yourself. New York: Bell Tower.en
dc.referencesTeubner, Gunther. 1996. “Globale Bukowina: Zur Emergenz eines transnationalen Rechtspluralismus.” Rechtshistorisches Journal 15: 253–255.en
dc.referencesThomas, Martin. 2014. “Turning Subjects into Objects and Objects into Subjects: Collecting Human Remains on the 1948 Arnhem Land Expedition.” In Circulating Cultures. Edited by Amanda Harris. 129–166. Canberra: ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CC.12.2014.06en
dc.referencesThompson Rivers University. 2023. “Indigenous Laws.” https://implementingtrc.pressbooks.tru.ca/chapter/natural-law/en
dc.referencesTibi, Bassam. 1990. “The Simultaneity of the Unsimultaneous: Old Tribes and Imposed Nation-States in the Modern Middle East.” In Tribes and State Nationalism in the Middle East. Edited by Philip Shukry Khoury, Joseph Kostiner. 127–149. Berkeley: University of California Press.en
dc.referencesTienda Palop de, Lydia, and Brais Currás. 2019. “The Dignity of the Dead: Ethical Reflections on the Archaeology of Human Remains.” In Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Edited by Kirsty Squires, David Errickson, Nicholas Márquez-Grant. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_2en
dc.referencesTilley, Helen. 2011. Africa as a Living Laboratory. Empire, Development, and the Problem of Scientific Knowledge, 1870–1950. Chicago–London: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226803487.001.0001en
dc.referencesTourme-Jouannet, Emmanuelle. 2013. “The International Law of Recognition.” European Journal of International Law 24(2): 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht021en
dc.referencesTrigger, Bruce. 1984. “Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist.” Man 19(3): 355–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802176en
dc.referencesTrzciński, Maciej. 2007. “Wokół definicji zabytku archeologicznego.” Ochrona Zabytków 4: 111–117.en
dc.referencesTürecay, Özgür. 2013. “The Ottoman Empire Seen through the Lens of Postcolonial Studies: A Recent Historiographical Turn.” Revue d’Histoire Moderne & Contemporaine 60–2(2): 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3917/rhmc.602.0127en
dc.referencesUlguim, Priscilla. 2017. “Recording In Situ Human Remains in Three Dimensions: Applying Digital Image-Based Modeling.” In Human Remains: Another Dimension. Edited by David Errickson, Tim Thompson. 71–92. London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804602-9.00007-2en
dc.referencesUllrich, Herbert. 2005. “Cannibalistic Rites within Mortuary Practices from the Paleolithic to Middle Ages in Europe.” Anthropologie 43(2–3): 249–261.en
dc.referencesUNESCO. 1997. Recommendation Concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000113234.page=2en
dc.referencesUNESCO. 2005. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.en
dc.referencesVan der Kuyl, Antoinette. 2022. “Historic and Prehistoric Epidemics: An Overview of Sources Available for the Study of Ancient Pathogene.” Epidemiologia 3: 443–464. https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia3040034en
dc.referencesVanderlinden, Jacques. 1989. “Return to Legal Pluralism: Twenty Years Later.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 21: 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1989.10756411en
dc.referencesWarsaw Mummies Project. 2016. https://blog.warsawmummyproject.com/why-the-famous-mummy-is-not-pregnanten
dc.referencesWeiner, Stephen. 2012. Microarchaeology. Beyond the Visible Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en
dc.referencesWeiss, Elisabeth, and James Springer. 2020. Repatriation and Erasing the Past. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9781683401575.001.0001en
dc.referencesWiercińska, Alina. 1970. “Badania antropologiczne ludzkich szczątków kostnych z cmentarzysk ciałopalnych w Korklinach, pow. Suwalski.” Rocznik Białostocki 9: 177–196.en
dc.referencesWinkelmann, Andreas, Holger Stoecker, Sarah Fründt et al. 2022. Interdisziplinäre Provenienzforschung zu menschlichen Überresten aus kolonialen Kontexten. Eine methodische Arbeitshilfe des Deutschen Zentrums Kulturgutverluste, des Berliner Medizinhistorischen Museums der Charité und von ICOM Deutschland. Heidelberg–Berlin: ICOM Deutschland.en
dc.referencesWytyczne Komisji Rabinicznej do Spraw Cmentarzy. N.d. https://sztetl.org.pl/en/wytyczne-komisji-rabinicznej-do-spraw-cmentarzyen
dc.referencesZamboni, Mauro. 2021. “‘A Legal Pluralist World’… or the Black Hole for Modern Legal Positivism.” Archiv für Rechts- und Soziologie 107(2): 185–204. https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2021-0010en
dc.referencesZimmerman, Larry. 2010. “The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology.” American Antiquity 75: 228–238. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.228en
dc.contributor.authorEmailMazur, Paweł - pawelmn@amu.edu.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailNowak, Ewa - ewanowak@amu.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6069.109.08
dc.relation.volume109


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
141-175_Mazur_Nowak.pdf
Rozmiar:
3.879MB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0